According to S.E Smith, overgrazing has caused the rivers to become muddy and murky, “causing problem downstream”. Intense agriculture of the region has “stripped the soil of nutrients”, slowly crippling the once plentiful abundance of the land. On top of this, farmers are now experimenting with extralocal plants and herbs, which call for suppression by fire to protect the land. He process not only places “heavy demands on water supplies”, but has also begun a chain of disastrous wildfires in the region, which cause the build-up of dead organic material and brush in the Pampas. (Smith)
Cattle farming, despite the disturbances it has caused, remained as staple apart of the Argentinian agricultural scene as it was in the 16th century until recently. In a continued effort to bring in a profit, this time to the Argentinian economy, beef exportation rates from the Pampas began climbing increasingly (Sheinin).
This is what eventually led to the manifestation of the Foot-and-Mouth virus that flew through the Argentinian countryside and slaughterhouses. This evidently had a negative impact on the economical productivity of one of Argentina’s largest agricultural sector, as a ban against any frozen or chilled meat from the Argentines was put in place in 1926, only to be lifted in 1993.This epidemic also caused a major change in the natural environment of the biome, as Foot and Mouth disease renders cattle, pigs, sheep, goats, deer and all camelids susceptible (Sheinin).
Another issue in the biome is that of habitat loss due to excessive rainfall. With global climate levels rising, rainfall levels have also increased worldwide. In Argentina, however, the ecosystem is especially impacted. In flat lands with sufficient water supply, flooding and it’s by product, loss of habitual territory, negatively impact the top predators of the biome directly (Canepuccia 407).
Canepuccia, who conducted an experiment on the pampas fox in the matter, says that the Pampas have “been subjected to the greatest in annual precipitation increase ever recorded” and has also suffered the most modifications of the native grasslands through agricultural work (407). The results of the study concluded that the excessive rainfall caused a large decrease in the number of prey available, and in turn, the number of Pampas foxes, however, the relative abundance of water birds in the Pampas increased. Above all this, the rainfall rates in Argentina are estimated to increase the next decade and the future of the local communities of species “will depend on their ability to cope with the reduction in habitat”, says Canepuccia (407).
A healthy biome is one that’s natural balance has not been tampered with. The Pampas have been increasingly exploited for over a century now and, while some changes are irreversible in our lifetimes, others can be fixed with global input.
The largest overall issue regarding the ecological state of the Pampas is the loss of habitat and species, mostly due to exploitation and pollution.
Cutting down the exploitation of cattle farming in the grasslands will lessen the hygienic issues that could lead to any other viral outbreaks, threatening many species of the Pampas that much less. This would also restore a small amount of the natural order of the biome which, no matter how little, benefits the ecosystem.
The issue of the excessive rainfall, however, is a much more difficult issue to solve. The global climate is changing due to the increasing Greenhouse effect, which is essentially the emission of gases such as carbon dioxide, methane and nitrous oxide into the atmosphere that leads to global warming. According to Richard Monasterky, “Satellite measurements reveal that over the last 15 years, the extent of polar sea ice has shrunk by 6 percent.” (230). This increase in sea levels is what causes the increasing levels of rainfall that threaten the species and terrestrial habitat of the Pampas.
To combat this, the world must make an effort to reduce greenhouse gas emission in their everyday lives by cutting down on energy, water and automobile use. Only then will we be able to heal the world, and all the ecosystems that have been disrupted by the sudden changes in the environment.
Bibliography
-
"Pampas, the." Encyclopædia Britannica. Encyclopædia Britannica Online School Edition.Encyclopædia Britannica, Inc., 2012. Web. 8 Dec. 2012
-
Arctic ice melt 'alarming' - Ocean could be ice-free in summers within 40 years and sea levels could rise by 1.6 M by 2100 !. 2011. AljazeeraWeb. 9 Dec 2012.
- Canepuccia, A.D. "Differential responses of marsh predators to rainfall-induced habitat loss and subsequent variations in prey availability." (2008): 407. Web. 8 Dec. 2012.
-
Jjw, . PAMPAS. 2007. WikipediaWeb. 9 Dec 2012.
-
L, Claire. The Pampas. 2002. BluePlanet BiomesWeb. 9 Dec 2012.
-
Monastersky, Richard. "Shrinking ice may mean warmer earth." Science News 8 Oct. 1988: 230. Canadian Periodicals Index Quarterly. Web. 8 Dec. 2012.
-
Sheinin, David. "Defying infection: Argentine foot-and-mouth disease policy, 1900-1930." Canadian Journal of History29.3 (1994): 501+. Canadian Periodicals Index Quarterly. Web. 8 Dec. 2012.
-
Smith, S.E. "What are the Pampas?." WiseGeek. N.p., 12 2012. Web. 8 Dec 2012.