• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Despite his apparently liberal policies, Alexander II was just as conservative as Alexander III. To what extent do you agree with this statement?

Extracts from this document...


?Despite his apparently liberal policies, Alexander II was just as conservative as Alexander III.? To what extent do you agree with this statement? Alexander II and Alexander III had very different approaches in the way they ruled Russia. Alexander II attempted to put a number of reforms in place, some of which were very successful. His ruling style highly contrasted that of Alexander III who was very repressive. I would therefore argue that Alexander II was much less conservative than his son, Alexander III, and that he was therefore a fairly liberal leader. On of Alexander II?s major reforms was that of the serf emancipation. This reform sought to free the peasants in Russia in order to improve the economy through the hypothetical improvement in farming, to end peasant revolts and most importantly, to create an efficient and effective army after the humiliating defeat in the Crimean War. At the time it was seen to be hugely reformist because in theory it gave the serfs freedom. ...read more.


After the first attempt on Alexander II?s life, he chose to return to a more conservative government that put in place a policy of repression that opposed many of his previous reforms, particularly those in education. For example, he eliminated subjects such as History which encouraged people to think for themselves, in fear of another attempt on his life being made. He did this because his Education Minister blamed the western education children were receiving for spread of revolutionary ideas, These new policies paved the way for Alexander III?s educational counter-reforms and it could therefore be said based on this particular factor that Alexander II was incredibly conservative, much like his son. Despite these two repressive policies, Alexander II put in place a number of reformist policies, one example being the censorship reform. This reform was hugely radical and massively different from anything that Russia had seen before because it allowed people to exercise freedom of speech slightly more than they had previously been able to. ...read more.


This reform under Alexander II?s reign was particularly liberal and on this factor alone it would be said that Alexander II was very dissimilar to his conservative son because this new policy instilled massive change. The educational reform seen under the reign of Alexander II was highly radical and differed highly from the conservative policies put in place after his assassination by his son. Westernised university education was begun to be taught and females now received traditional, non-vocational education. These new policies were perhaps the most dramatically different changes that were enlisted by Alexander II because these changes paved the way for a new way of thinking amongst Russian students. This therefore shows Alexander II to be a liberal rather than a conservative. In conclusion, I believe that although some policies Alexander II put in place could be considered as highly conservative, particularly those after the attempt on his life. However, I believe that especially in comparison with the conservative policies that preceded and succeeded him, Alexander II was a liberal ruler as opposed to a conservative one because his policies differed so dramatically to those of the conservative rulers. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our International Baccalaureate History section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related International Baccalaureate History essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Compare and Contrast the Policies of Alexander II and Alexander III

    3 star(s)

    stopped any conquests or waging of wars by the Russian Empire, unlike his paternal predecessor, Alexander II. Thus, Alexander III Foreign Policy played more of a peacemaking role unlike Alexander II's which was very militarily aggressive. The sphere of judicial policy was also an area where there were big differences between the two Tsars.

  2. To what extent did Alexander II succeed reforming Russian life and institutions?

    As the aim of the reform was to break serfdom while minimizing the social, economic and political disruption that would ensue, many were disappointed by its limitations. The serfs seem to have gained quite a lot from the statuses, however upon closer examination the gains are negated by considerable losses.

  1. To what extent did the reforms of Alexander II achieve his aims

    The Emancipation Edict was finally announced on 19 February 1861. It however applied only to privately owned serfs (serfs owned by the state had to wait until 1866). Serfs were now free to marry anyone, own property and start their own business.

  2. To what extent were Stalins economic policies successful up to 1940?

    The Communist party introduced the system of paying the workers by the amount they produced, not the amount of hours they worked. On top of that Sunday was not recognized as a holiday anymore, so workers worked as much as they could, with no rest days.[23] Anybody who was opposed

  1. The Great Revolt (Indian Mutiny) of 1857 came as a surprise to the British, ...

    The zamindars were the tax collectors. They took away the right to own any land and the high taxes made sure that most revenue went to the British. From 1770 to 1857 there were major famines but the taxes continued to be horded in. Though this was not in the hands of the zamindars, the peasant felt otherwise.

  2. To what extent were the social changes in Germany between 1865 and 1890 the ...

    On the other side of the Rhine, France had become a fresh military power under Second Empire, that of Napoleon III, which adopted multiple authoritarian features. This process of continuing centralization and economic development was aided by the development of French banks and railway transport after 1850.

  1. "The Worst Human Right Abuses occur in LEDCs". To what extent do you agree ...

    They are considered the worst because it eventually leads on to penal sentences that last decades. These extensive penal sentences can degrade a human being?s psychological state and cause high expenses to a nation?s criminal section budget. Additionally, it can also lead on to even more deaths, therefore causing a continuous cycle of violence amongst human individuals or organizations.

  2. Which of indoctrination and repression proved most effective for consolidating Hitler's power (1933-1939)?

    Which would become problematic in times of war. Therefore Hitler needed to get a hold of these. The trade union leaders didn?t take Hitler?s government seriously and that?s one of the reasons why they were disposed of so fast. In fact they believed that the Nazi government would soon collapse

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work