• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Why did the policy of Collective Security established by the League of Nations fail to prevent the outbreak of war in 1939?

Extracts from this document...


Why did the policy of Collective Security established by the League of Nations fail to prevent the outbreak of war in 1939? "I have returned from Germany with Peace for our Time!" waving in his hand the paper of the Munich Pact, on an airfield in Southern England, this famous phrase by Prime Minister Neville Chamberlain in September 1938 is mostly remembered for its massive misjudgement of n**i Germany�s true intentions and the total failure of appeasement. However, it could - symbolically - also well be seen as the final nail in the coffin for the League of Nations covenant and its strategies of Collective Security and Disarmament. A few months earlier, in March 1938, n**i Germany had annexed Austria, a League Member, thus causing a league member to "disappear" without any reaction from the League whatsoever, demonstrating to the world its absolute powerlessness, and less than a year after Chamberlain�s unintentionally ironic speech, Germany would invade Poland and start the Second World War. ...read more.


Further proof can be found in the Abyssinian crisis and the Munich Pact, which once again delineate the LON's restricted authority. Finally, with the Munich Pact, France and the United Kingdom conceded the Sudetenland to n**i Germany in a direct violation of their military alliance with Czechoslovakia. Here two Nation-States were rigorously pursuing their own national interests to damaging another Country, ally even. This unilateral pursuit of security interests by individual nations is in stark contrast to the ideas and intentions of Collective Security proposed by the League of Nations, which by this time was incapable of any action. Equally, the above key examples of individual Nation-States aggressively pursuing their own interests throughout the 1930�s is in contrast to the rampant optimism and clear willingness to collaborate internationally that seemed to prevail throughout much of the 1920�s. Perhaps under the impression of the still fresh horrors of WWI, a conviction that only through working closely together on numerous fronts could Collective Security be effectively achieved. ...read more.


practice, the depression made countries desire more land and more power as they were more worried about their own problems than the international issues, as the league kept failing nations ended up ignoring it, the main members let the league down as Italy and Japan were more interested in satisfying their own needs and France and Britain betrayed it,. Ultimately, a contract, or covenant is only as good as the true intention and willingness of those that make part of it. If the partners, and especially the major players, continuously undermine and counteract the agreement, it must ultimately fail. This was the fate of the LON covenant. It was so ambitious and far-reaching, it wanted too much from too many too fast. Even the key proponents of the covenant were not able keep their promise once their National interests were seen as even potentially threatening. In the end, national sovereignty was of great importance and overcame internationalism and the League of Nations. Daniel Longo Collective Security Failure History 11th HL Ms. Mcphilemy Daniel Longo Collective Security Failure History 11th HL Ms. Mcphilemy ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our International Baccalaureate History section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related International Baccalaureate History essays

  1. Free essay

    May the League of Nations be considered a complete failure? Answer this question and ...

    The first was introduced by the British Prime Minister in the attempt to convince the members of the international body to "accept arbitration (Lowe, p.47)" of the League and to pledge and commit themselves to acting, in order to protect a hypothetical victim of attack.

  2. How did collective security develop, in particular between WWI and WWII?

    Governments might have difficulties explaining to population why they are doing things, if its not in their interest. Richelieu, a French adviser of the king in the 17th century, first described collective security. ("What Happened to the Head of Cardinal Richelieu, after His Death?")

  1. Neville Chamberlain and Appeasement

    Following the Versailles Treaty signed in 1919 which concluded WW1, the British shared sympathy towards the Germans who could be said to have been treated unfairly, as they had to pay huge reparation bills. This also influenced Britain, as the German and British were linked together in the sense that

  2. The cold war - the conferences and the start of the cCold War

    Austria did not apply to join NATO and for many years did not apply to join the European Union - It is highly likely that the Soviets agreed to this settlement in the hope that a similar process might then be adopted in Germany COMECON - COMECON: Council for Mutual

  1. Wars frequently begin ten years before the first shot is fired. To what extent ...

    The Schlieffen Plan was activated on 31 July 1914. The movement of the German army into Belgium led directly to the British decision to declare war on Germany by 4 August 1914. Therefore, the Schlieffen Plan had caused Britain to be involved in WWI, which Germany was trying to prevent.

  2. IB History HL, Extended Notes: Russia, the Tsars, the Provisional Govenment and the Revolution.

    Constituent Assembly 1917-1918 1. Lenin was forced to hold the general elections which had been promised by the PG, railways workers threatened to shut down the railways if he didn?t. 2. Threat to Bolsheviks as the winning party would probably form a new government.

  1. Why did collective security fail to keep the peace between 1920 and 1935?

    and Bulgaria and Greece (1925). League was too weak without the support of the USA, Russia, and Germany to make a big country do as it wished (for instance, Italy over Corfu in 1923). Another weakness was that the League?s structure was a complete mess.

  2. To what extent was Germany responsible for the outbreak of war in Europe in ...

    As a result there was a rise in nationalism and nationalist parties playing a large role in allowing for Hitler and the n**i Party to get into power in 1933. Hitler?s promises of reversing the terms of the Treaty of Versailles and restoring the German economy following the damaging effects

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work