In terms of the rope, the connection between these characters is one of the more consistent relationships. Provide textual evidence. However, Lucky is strangely submissive. In explaining Lucky's behavior, Pozzo acknowledges the comfort of Lucky. Lucky has every right to make him comfortable but this aspect depends on him. As the play progresses through Act I, Pozzo imagines that when he sees how well Lucky carries (the luggage/baggage), he will be tempt to keeping him (Check your tenses). Despite Lucky’s miserable condition, Lucky (He) does not seem to wish for change. Possibly he is happy, or maybe not miserable enough. Lucky also can’t visualize himself as a different person. Make a transitional sentence.
On the next day, the two companions appear again, the rope between them is significantly shorter so that the now-blind Pozzo may find his way. In this new circumstance, it is unclear which character is the leading body or the one truly in control. As the author states in a (the) stage directions, “Pozzo is blind…Rope as before, but much shorter, so that Pozzo may follow more easily” (87). With the textual support, (Don’t say that) Pozzo is dependent on Lucky for direction, which further applies to the claim that Lucky is dependent on Pozzo for the same reason, despite the fact that the relationship is one of emotional dependence rather than physical dependence. What does the shortness of the rope imply? What is your opinion?
Further in to the play, other stage directions indicate that Lucky and Pozzo fall down after they bump into Estragon. Lucky falls and drops everything and on the way down, he brings down Pozzo with him. These two characters lie motion and powerless among the scattered luggage. The two companions (use different word), one disabled with blindness and the other on the verge of death, are unable to rise off the ground, Pozzo tries to get up but he is unable to ascend without assistance. Pozzo calls for help, which shows despair. Pozzo tries to end the despair by telling Estragon to jolt the rope that is still around Lucky's neck, but Pozzo forgets how Lucky will react when Estragon pulls the rope ad (omit) from Act 1, and further more, Estragon’s hate towards of Lucky. So Estragon kicks Lucky in revenge, but this action fails to achieve anything. Estragon and Lucky’s relationship collective weakness soon ends however, as Pozzo decides to once again dominate Lucky in the familiar manner. The loving violence resumes as Pozzo screams, “Enough Up pig!” Lucky reacts as before and gets up and no longer feels equal to his master (103). The length of the rope is not changed literally but the rope affects the relationship of dominance and submission. Vladimir and Estragon have a similar relationship in many ways, due to the certain amount of submission and domination in their interactions with one another. The submission and domination, however, is less valued and less implied than in the interaction between Pozzo and Lucky.
Overall, the relationship of Pozzo and Lucky seems to be a necessary evil. They never seem to agree on much or even get along very well, but still seem to be two parts of a single person. Whenever their relationship is danger, they cease to function normally.
Good overall essay but work on the evidence and conclusion
