• Join over 1.2 million students every month
• Accelerate your learning by 29%
• Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month
Page
1. 1
1
2. 2
2
3. 3
3
4. 4
4
5. 5
5
6. 6
6
7. 7
7
8. 8
8
9. 9
9
10. 10
10

# Circular motion lab

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Physics Lab – Circular Motion

Candidate Name:                                                        Date:

Candidate No.:                                                                        Lab Number:

Subject Level: Physics SL                                                                Teacher’s Sign:

Aim of Experiment:

To verify the circular motion theory through data analysis and plotting relevant data graphs, thus obtaining at a value for the acceleration due to gravity.

Apparatus used:

1. String
2. Metal bob
3. Weighing scale (Least Count - ±0.01 gm)
4. Ruler (Least Count = , 0.05 cm)
5. Weights of different weights (Least Count = ±0.01 gm)

Hypothesis:

The acceleration of gravity has been proven to be equal to the ratio of:

1. Mass of bob × 4π × radius of the bob
2. Time × mass of larger body

This gives us the formula: g = 4×π×r×m ÷ t×M.

Thus using this formula, and by the process of data collection and processing, we can prove that the acceleration due to gravity on the surface of the Earth is the same as the considered value of approximately 9.8 ms-2 .

Procedure:

• A metal bob is tied to an inelastic string.
• The string is then held while the bob is rotated in a horizontal circular motion.
• The time taken for 20 revolutions is recorded using a stopwatch.
• The radius of the arc is then changed, and readings for the time are taken again.
• The procedure is repeated for 10 different radii (lengths of string) and 5 readings for the time are taken for each radius.
• The data is then used to find the average radius and average time, to find the acceleration due to gravity.

Error Propagation:

• Error Of Meter Scale = Least count of meter scale ÷ 2 (Analog Instrument)

=

= 0. 05 cm

• Error of Calculated Time = Least Count ÷ 2 = 0.1 ÷ 2

0.05 s

• Small mass (m) = 18.46 ± 0.01 gms
• Big Mass (M) = 300.00 ± 0.01 gms

Middle

16.40

16.50

17.20

16.90

10.

58.00

16.60

17.60

17.90

17.80

18.10

Now, we can take all the time periods to find the Average Time Period, since

Time average = Time periods of all trials ÷ No. of Trials

For example,
T
2 (average) = (11.60 +12.00 + 11.80 +11.20 +11.0) ÷ 5     =  11.52 ± 0.05 s

 No. Length (L)[in cm]± 0.05 cm Time (T1)[in seconds]± 0.05 s Time (T2)[in seconds]± 0.05 s Time (T3)[in seconds]± 0.05 s Time (T4)[in seconds]± 0.05 s Time (T5)[in seconds]± 0.05 s Time average(in seconds)± 0.05 s 1. 49.00 10.90 11.20 11.00 11.10 11.10 11.06 2. 50.00 11.60 12.00 11.80 11.20 11.0 11.52 3. 51.00 11.60 11.10 11.20 11.00 11.30 11.24 4. 52.00 11.80 13.00 12.10 12.20 12.10 12.24 5. 53.00 13.10 13.00 12.90 13.00 13.10 13.02 6. 54.00 14.00 14.10 14.00 14.30 14.20 14.12 7. 55.00 14.90 15.20 14.50 14.90 15.10 14.92 8. 56.00 16.10 15.80 15.90 16.20 16.30 16.06 9. 57.00 17.00 16.40 16.50 17.20 16.90 16.80 10. 58.00 16.60 17.60 17.90 17.80 18.10 17.60

Next, the average time period for one oscillation as per every length is calculated by dividing the average time period of that length by a factor of 20.

Conclusion

Thus, Time period for 1 revolution= Time (average) / Number of                                                       revolutions

= 13.86 / 20

= 0.693 seconds

Average Radius = (49+50+51+52+53+54+55+56+57+58) / 10

= 53.5 cm

Thus, using the acquired values, we get the acceleration due to gravity as

g = 4×π×r×m ÷ t×M.

= 4π (53.5)2 (18.458) / (14.7)2 (300)

g= 10.25 ms-2

Conclusion:

Thus through the above experiment we find that the acceleration due to gravity is approximately 10.25 ms-2

Evaluation :

As mentioned before, the ideal acceleration due to gravity on the surface of the Earth is considered to be approximately 9.81 ms-2. However, considering the method used above and the surroundings in which it was conducted, the experiment can be called successful.

There are many reasons that would explain the deviation in the value, some of which would be:

• Wind causing improper execution of the experiment
• Ceiling fans deviating the natural path of the arc
• Possible error in the apparatus used, like the weighing scale not being completely accurate

If these factors are to be eliminated, the deviation would certainly reduce, making the value more accurate.

The percentage deviation in the experiment = (Deviation/ 9.81) × 100

= (10.25 – 9.81/ 9.81)×100

= 4.48 %

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our International Baccalaureate Physics section.

## Found what you're looking for?

• Start learning 29% faster today
• 150,000+ documents available
• Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
• Join over 1.2 million students every month
• Accelerate your learning by 29%
• Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

# Related International Baccalaureate Physics essays

1. ## Investigate the factors affecting the period of a double string pendulum

but I would have been very hard to measure this with a 30 cm ruler possibly giving inaccurate and imprecise values. This contributes to be a major limitation to the analysis of my investigation. If I had a choice I would used a bigger metal bar perhaps of 50 cm

2. ## Suspension Bridges. this extended essay is an investigation to study the variation in tension ...

the two strings in question; an inelastic and a relatively elastic string. At the end of the study, the strain value is related to the observations leaving scope for predictions about the behavior of strings of different properties. Experimental Design The practical application of my research question lies in suspension bridges and even guitar strings.

1. ## Simple Harmonic Motion Physics HL Lab Report

Hence I plotted a graph of length (L) versus the period2 (T2) and in that graph as seen the best fit line passes through the origin. Hence we can see that the original prediction was wrong and in fact length (L)

2. ## Uniform Motion Lab. This experiment will measure the motion of a cart moving on ...

V=0.187m/0.1s V=1.87 m/s 2. V=0.352m/0.2s V=1.76m/s 3. V=0.529m/0.3s V=1.76m/s 4. V=0.702m/0.4s V=1.76m/s 5. V=0.872m/0.5s V=1.74m/s 6. V=1.034m/0.6s V=1.72 m/s Evaluation:- As predicted, the velocity throughout the experiment remained relatively the same. Since the cart travelled with uniform motion, the velocity remained the same and was not affected greatly, except for slightly at the beginning and close to the end of the experiment.

1. ## Physics IA -motion

/ 9 = 93.473% Uncertainty = sum of uncertainties/ number of uncertainties = 12/9 = 1.33 = 1 The average accuracy of the radar gun is 93.473% �1. However this accuracy has only be taken from a small range of velocities (19km/h - 42km/h.)

2. ## Pendulum work out the value of acceleration due to gravity (g), by using ...

* Calculator- For processing and calculation a calculator is used to avoid errors. > Procedure- 1. Tie the string to the mass bob of unknown weight and suspend it from the table stand as shown in the diagram. Make sure that the two small blocks of wood are in such

1. ## Horizontal Circular Motion Lab

Since swinging the rubber stopper with the apparatus fatigues the arm of the swinger, the three partners will take turns to swing the stopper, record the data, and time the experiment to ensure the accuracy of our data. A total of 10 trials (minimum) will be recorded for the experiment.

2. ## HL Physics Revision Notes

Could cause damage to molecules such as DNA which could lead to it ceasing to function. Molecular damage could prevent cells from dividing and multiplying Could cause malignant cells to grow which is called cancer Why are some nuclei stable and unstable?

• Over 160,000 pieces
of student written work
• Annotated by
experienced teachers
• Ideas and feedback to