• Join over 1.2 million students every month
• Accelerate your learning by 29%
• Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month
Page
1. 1
1
2. 2
2
3. 3
3
4. 4
4
5. 5
5
6. 6
6
7. 7
7

# How does the mass of a spherical object and the height from which it is dropped into sand affect the width and depth of the crater formed?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

000345-056

An Investigation of the Formation of Craters

Question:

How does the mass of a spherical object and the height from which it is dropped into sand affect the width and depth of the crater formed?

Introduction:

Background Information:

The formation of a crater is caused by the transfer of kinetic energy from the dropping object to potential energy present in the possible crater. In order to determine the relationship between the mass of the object, the height from which it is dropped from, and the size of the crater the relationship between these two energies must be determined.

The potential energy is equivalent to lifting the crater volume out of the substance and depositing it nearby. This energy can be represented by the equation  where m is mass, and  is the depth of the crater. The mass of the crater is equal to Vd, where d is the density of the crater and V is volume. The crater volume can be defined by the equation for the volume of a spherical cap (a spherical cap is a portion of a sphere which is cut off horizontally). Thus, where a is the radius of the cap and h is the depth. Put into terms of the diameter s, volume can be represented as .  Plugging in this equation, the potential energy present in the crater is represented by.

Middle

.165

.0075

.0430

5.67

4.25

2

.0193

.065

.0075

.0380

4.47

3.36

.065

.0075

.0390

4.70

3.53

.115

.0080

.0440

6.35

5.08

.115

.0085

.0430

6.49

5.53

.165

.0085

.0480

8.01

6.81

.165

.0090

.0470

8.19

7.37

3

.0284

.065

.0100

.0390

6.50

6.50

.065

.0100

.0390

6.50

6.50

.115

.0105

.0450

8.96

9.40

.115

.0110

.0430

8.68

9.55

.165

.0110

.0465

10.0

11.0

.165

.0110

.0450

9.44

10.39

4

.0053

.065

.0070

.0286

0.243

1.70

.065

.0065

.0240

1.61

1.049138

.115

.0075

.0310

3.05

2.288454

.115

.0080

.0280

2.73

2.184873

.165

.0100

.0340

5.06

5.0632

.165

.0090

.0300

3.56

3.206309

*The height of drop is not 10, 15 or 20 cm as described in the procedure because the depth of the sand in the container was taken into consideration.

**The volume was generated from the formula . The units are cm for purposes of readability.

Columns 6 and 7 are processed data, generated from the raw measurements of crater depth and width.

Graphs:

The graphs which compared volume  crater depth to the height of the drop were generated using data from each individual object, in order to ensure that mass was kept constant. The graphs which compared volume

Conclusion

.1 cm. The experiment was also weaker because in order to measure crater depth the object had to be carefully removed first. This inherently weakened the crater, sometimes causing the depth to be slightly changed from what it had initially been.  The experiment was limited by the fact that only two trials were conducted for each height for a respective mass. Three trials would have been better, as a more accurate average could be defined than if only two trials were conducted. This would also help to eliminate outliers better, because there would be two other data points to average with, versus only one.

If the experiment was repeated, then each of these weaknesses or limitations could be addressed. The inconsistency associated with using my hand could be eliminated by using a clamping system to drop each ball. This would eliminate much of the induced error, as the clamp could be set at a given height without any unsteadiness or inaccuracy. The problems associated with measuring crater depth could be resolved if a set of steel balls of differing mass were used. A magnet could then be used to extract each ball, rather than lifting each one out with my fingers. This would allow for easier and gentler extraction, again helping to eliminate inconsistency. Also, more trials could be conducted, helping the experiment to achieve a more accurate representation of the data. If these changes were implemented then the experiment would become more accurate.

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our International Baccalaureate Physics section.

## Found what you're looking for?

• Start learning 29% faster today
• 150,000+ documents available
• Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
• Join over 1.2 million students every month
• Accelerate your learning by 29%
• Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

# Related International Baccalaureate Physics essays

1. ## How does the mass of the paper helicopter affect the drop time of the ...

upon it are unbalanced and the amount of acceleration is directly proportional to the amount of net force acting upon it. Falling objects initially accelerate because there is no force big enough to balance the downward force of gravity so the object will continue to accelerate until the air resistance

2. ## Investigate the Size of Craters in Sand Due to Dropped Object.

Or in other words, we can say that the depth of craters is also proportional to the volume of craters. Once the depth of craters increased, as the result the volume of craters will increase too. Research Question: * What is the correlation between the depth of craters in sand

1. ## Physics Wave revision question

Calculate the frequency of the waves. ......................................................................................................................... ......................................................................................................................... (1) (ii) The waves pass simultaneously through point P. Use the graphs to determine the resultant displacement at point P of the two waves at time t = 1.0 ms and at time t = 8.0 ms.

2. ## The Affect of Mass on the Time It Takes an Object To Fall

experiment we set up our materials as illustrated in the previous diagram, with a measured piece of PVC pipe of 184cm in length taped to a table. We then measured the mass of the paper helicopter with no added mass, which was 1.1g, and also the mass of each of the nine paperclips, all of which were 0.4g each.

1. ## Physics-investigate the relationship of temperature and the height of the bounce of a squash ...

trying to reduce the random error, but if I were to carry it out once again I would have increased the number of trials/attempts to reduce still the random error that it ever-present.

2. ## In this extended essay, I will be investigating projectile motion via studying the movement ...

should always hold true. Experimental Setup Description I have designed an experiment to study the effects of projection height and compressed length of spring on the range of a metal ball. The metal ball we used is made of steel, and its weight is 17.0 g � 0.05g.

1. ## Oscillating Mass

of elongation will be controlled by displacing the spring by the same length while using different masses. The spring constant k of the spring is also controlled by using the same spring throughout the experiment. 2 Planning B 2.1 Apparatus 1.

2. ## How does the sinkage depth of a tyre affect its rolling resistance ?

In soft surfaces such as sand and loose surface the tire has to do more work as compared to hard surfaces such as asphalt because the tire sinks deeper in the surface and in order to get over the interlocking force between tire and sand more work is done as compared.

• Over 160,000 pieces
of student written work
• Annotated by
experienced teachers
• Ideas and feedback to