• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Are reason and emotion equally necessary in justifying moral decisions?

Extracts from this document...


Are reason and emotion equally necessary in justifying moral decisions? Morality is a system of rules that modifies our behavior in social situations. It's about the doing of good instead of harm, and it sets some standard of virtuous conduct.1 However there is no formula for moral decision making. It is not a process which can easily be based on a determinate set of rules. Moreover it is important to see that good moral decision making involves more than just acting on hunches or intuitions. For this reason it can be argued that reason and emotion are both necessary components in justifying moral decisions. Good moral decision making involves, knowing the facts of the situation, and careful consideration of the moral values that are relevant to a given situation. Importantly, it involves compassion to the moral dimensions of everyday situations, and an awareness of the range of interests involved in specific decisions; Emotion and reason. Emotion is a very influential way of knowing merely because it is subconsciously used by everyone when making a decision, moral or not. Emotions are urgent and irrational impulses that come from our body; on the other hand reason is reflective analysis that comes from education and civilisation.2 I would like to use a personal experience to enhance my argument. ...read more.


Deductive logic can be used to make a premise. For instance killing human beings is wrong; human life begins when a baby is conceived; therefore abortion is wrong. Language has little merit in justifying whether abortion is the right moral diction. In order to asses the situation we must consider whose decision it is for a baby to be aborted. Language can be used to communicate each individual reason and emotion towards the matter at hand; however the most important point of view is not being taken into consideration; the unborn baby whose life is the one in question. Another way language can be used is through immediate assumptions; these assumptions also lead to judgmental perceptions. As soon as the word abortion is mentioned the majority associates it as being a wrong moral decision. It is a word more often than not is associated with a negative image; if this is the case then our perception tells us that abortion is wrong. History essentially exists so we can learn from mistakes and use them to make correct decisions for an improved future. We cannot know everything, but if we learn from the past we can balance our decisions, and agree upon the best solutions based on all input, information and considerations available. ...read more.


We could also use inductive logic. This process allows particular information to become more generalized. It is more informative than deduction but less certain. To do this we would look at the information over time and then make a generalized conclusion, this is sometimes less accurate as it is very general. Emotion is probably the biggest influence of the premature baby debate. A baby stereotypically has a big effect on people's emotion as it is so vulnerable. Our emotions take over and do not think of the many reasons as to why helping the baby with medical care could actually result in a lot of pain for both the baby and parents. In conclusion we cannot have a universal law to solve this debate as there are too many conflicting opinions by different cultures, countries and religions. This is the same for all moral decisions as there are so many reasons and background premises that can affect whether it is wrong or right. Individual cases need to be analyzed and looked at in detail for a moral decision to be the best one. Therefore Emotion and reason are both important components in justifying a moral decision, however each individual case needs to be examined to determine what is needed more to make the best decision, or if each components reason and emotion are equal to making a moral decision. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our International Baccalaureate Theory of Knowledge section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related International Baccalaureate Theory of Knowledge essays

  1. Free essay

    Are reason and emotion equally necessary in justifying moral decisions?

    On the other hand, emotion adds feelings to knowledge. It affects what you believe in and how you react to it. Knowledge has to be objectively right and you must believe that it is true. For example, if a person who believed the world is flat later finds out that

  2. Socratic dialogueAre reason and logic purely objective and universal, or do they vary across ...

    For example, some government and companies, believe that wars are beneficial to the country for their personal benefits such as making a lot of illegal money and smuggling weapons. Susan. Aren't you just proving my point that logic and reasons are based on cultures?

  1. Discuss the view that we cannot justify absolutist moral rules in a multi cultural ...

    ?Moral relativism is the declaration that there are no fixed absolutes; or, if there are, they cannot be known by human beings.? This quote from the philosopher Alister McGrath gives a basic understanding of moral relativism, it points out the most important characteristic.

  2. Are reason and emotion equally necessary in justifying moral decisions?

    victory, which we would have most likely not seen if I had chosen to let my emotions get the better of me and pick my friends for the team. The choice had slight emotional consequences as my friends who really needed the game for their practice, into the bigger leagues

  1. Are reason and emotion equal in justifying moral decisions?

    to do and his emotions will not disturb him but reason might tell him that it is wrong to steal because it harms someone else, thus benefiting the society. However his reason will not stop him from stealing because he is not personally affected or disturbed by his conscience but

  2. Although complete dependence on intuition is not suggested, intuition is often surprisingly accurate. But ...

    However, how about the explanation with intuitive appealing feelings based on logical reasoning? Does this explanation should necessarily be discarded too? "Intuition isn't the enemy, but the ally, of reason"- quoted from a famous journalist, John Kord Lagemann . This shows that intuition is not always false as there is

  1. Debate Topic - Individuals have a moral obligation to assist people in need.

    We see examples of numerous codes, religions, and traditions throughout history and dispersed globally which developed the same pillars of altruism and benevolence for people in need. This is an extraordinary paradigm of just how pervasive this most essential concept of morality is.

  2. Discuss the Role of Language and Reason in History

    American Revolution, the Americans view this event as a fight for freedom and equality as they were charged higher prices for the same tea than the British.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work