• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Deconstructive Essay - Creationism Should not be Taught in School Science Classes as an Alternative to Evolution.

Extracts from this document...


´╗┐Creationism Should not be Taught in School Science Classes as an Alternative to Evolution. My view is that creationism is not a science, it is a belief. Because it is a belief it has no place being taught as a science, and hence does not belong in a science classroom.[1] I will not only show that creationism is wrong, but also that evolution is the only reasonable explanation for the development of life.[2] There is no physical or scientific evidence that supports the beliefs of creationism, while there is a vast amount of evidence from a wide range of sciences that together point to the evolution over time of life on Earth.[3] The many disciplines of science that have contributed to the formulation of the theory of evolution include geology, botany, chemistry, taxonomy, molecular biology, genetics, palaeontology, nuclear physics and biochemistry to name a few. These have contributed thousands of articles in peer-reviewed journals to painstakingly describe how the forces of natural selection have shaped the character and nature ...read more.


For example, if the remains of a fossilised human were to be found in the same rock layer as a fossilised dinosaur, with no obvious distortion of the surrounding rock, then that would count as evidence against evolution, which clearly states the humans did not exist at the time of dinosaurs. Or if any one of the many dating techniques that scientists employ were to consistently give the same age for organisms that were supposed separated by millions of years, then this would count against evolution. Creationism allows for no such procedure. Faced with countless examples of evidence supporting an old earth, or of the gradual evolution of animals as shown in the fossil record, or with molecular studies showing how evolution occurs at a genetic level, they simple refuse to accept the evidence. [9] Not only this, but creationists assume that if they cast doubt on evolution that they must be right by default. ...read more.


Nor does it mirror the scientific process in any way. As such, the notion that it be given equal time in a ?science? focused educational environment (or, indeed, any educational environment) is simply ludicrous[18]. It should not be taught period. Creationism is an affront against both science and religion.[19] ________________ [1] Stating my position. [2] Direct argument [3] Main reason for why I have this view [4] Supporting evidence for my position [5] Other resons for my posiiton [6] Burden of Proof on my opponents [7] Main belief of my opponents [8] Main reson they are wrong [9] Other reasons why they are wrong [10] Demonstrates the problem of a direct attack in this context [11] Ridicule of my opponent?s view [12] Attributing the non rational argument of ?invincible ignorance? to my opponents [13] Demonstrating that my opponents argument is not related to the point at issue. [14] Rhetorical question [15] Black & White fallacy [16] Emotive language [17] Circular argument. [18] Ridicule [19] Emotive language ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our International Baccalaureate Theory of Knowledge section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related International Baccalaureate Theory of Knowledge essays

  1. The Provisional Nature of Science

    Furthermore, in math, once something is proved, it is no longer contested. For example, today nobody would contest that six multiplied by five is not thirty. Math, arguably, is a human construct, so it is up to us to make up symbols that would represent the patterns that we encounter.

  2. Tok essay- context is all

    An instance of this could be the idea that 'I own an invisible pink elephant': this could be made consistent with the fact that pink elephants don't exist by claiming that they are invisible and so we cannot see them.

  1. TOK Essay 3

    However when history is reanalyzed we find that in reality, not all Germans were in support of the Nazis or Hitler and some Nazis were in fact forced to take part in these acts of violence. We discovered that not all Germans were as awful and blood thirsty as the 'victors' claimed.

  2. TOK Journals

    the patterns we discover over time to predict the future, with, of course, not guarantees about the accuracy and precision at best. What do we "know" about the world by the process of induction? Technically, we do not "know" anything about the world by the process of induction, not to

  1. Tok Essay - Question 5 2010

    sciences go through cycles, periods of normal science and incremental progress followed by periods of revolutionary science and extraordinary progress. The reasons for this, suggests Kuhn, is that science practitioners are able to establish periods of broad consensus in which clusters of theories and laws are more or less accepted as "given" by most scientists.

  2. Speech. Our knowledge issue is To what extent should censorship be allow in school. ...

    Furthermore there are students who spend numerous hours playing games not suitable for their age, but ended up perfectly fine. For example if we take our good friend Paul Jeong who played violent games ever since he was a

  1. TOK essay question 8.

    As we have to discuss the fact that we have objective knowledge with or without relying on experience and culture, these bring up two points of view, which is the impossibility and possibility of it. Start with impossible perspective, in which it has to be related with our own experience

  2. Tok Chap 1-3

    Colour blindness. * Some philosophers claimed that reason gives us greater certainty than perception, yet people are not very good at abstract reasoning in that they are liable to make all kinds of mistakes. * Some things strike us as intuitively obvious yet it varies from individuals.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work