• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

How important are the opinions of experts in the search for knowledge?

Extracts from this document...


´╗┐How important are the opinions of experts in the search for knowledge? Man is a social animal who needs company and advices He is distinguished from others creatures by his deep search of knowledge. Knowledge is a deep concept. It is no such thing lying around to be picked and learned. It can only be understood through our experience. It is created by us through the four ways of knowing namely-sense perception, language, reasoning and emotion. But since these ways of knowing can sometimes be misleading, man staggers in his journey to knowledge We are not living in the Garden of Eden where grows the Tree of Knowledge of Good and Evil. Man has to distinguish between what is right and wrong, in this context I feel that opinions of experts are necessary. Man shows huge faith in the power of the so called experts. An expert is a person who has a formidable authority in the subject concerned. He is experienced enough to enlighten the mind of others through his expert advice. Man has to rely on expert opinion to ascertain truth and also to justify many of his knowledge claims. ...read more.


It is the irony of human fate that man shows an inherent tendency to become what he believes. And such beliefs may sometimes be prejudicial to human interest. The knowledge claims in Ethics as an area of knowledge help us distinguish between right and wrong; good and evil. It is such an area where the advice of the experts thrusts us into a dilemma as the opinion of the expert is always sought after in the absence of any rulebook about what is right and wrong. Ethics is an issue that is opposed to the scientific spirit. Cloning, abortion and euthanasia are a few issues on which moralists look with contempt as they consider these scientific advancements as an attempt to reverse the role of nature. In my opinion these inventions are revolutionary and can never be lightly. I feel ethics is a field where the belief and faith of a person is what matters most. We should use our reason and rationality before implementing the opinions of the moralists in our lives. Religion is another area of knowledge that is highly opinionated, and here the opinions of priests and pundits are sought after. ...read more.


Ethics and religion are areas of knowledge that are unlikeliest to offer any empirical evidence in support of the opinions of their experts. Only our ways of knowing are not sufficient in deciding the efficacy of an opinion. Unlike them, Science as an area of knowledge is based on empirical evidence rather than wild guesses and superficial opinions. It is the ultimate justified belief -the certain way of knowing. It is there with us to help ascertain the cogency of an opinion. My conclusion is that although the opinions of the experts have been revolutionary in enhancing the human lot, yet they cannot be always relied on. The opinion of an expert should be considered his personal viewpoint and not a fact. Mere opinions lacking empirical evidence can be detrimental in our quest of knowledge. A person can be an expert in a particular field, but his views may not be relevant in other areas of knowledge. For example Sigmund Freud may be an authority in the field of psychology, and Einstein in science. But what will happen if their roles are reversed? We have to be wary lest a false opinion should become our belief and belief our principle. Reference 1. http://www.darwins-theory-of-evolution.com/ 2 http://www.personal-eveloent.com/chuck/falseopinions.htm ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our International Baccalaureate Theory of Knowledge section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related International Baccalaureate Theory of Knowledge essays

  1. How important are the opinions of experts in the search for knowledge?

    Hans Eysenck once commented, "Scientists, especially when they leave the particular field in which they have specialised, are just as ordinary, pig - headed and unreasonable as anybody else, and their unusually high intelligence only makes their prejudices all the more dangerous."3 Next, we come to ethics, we see that

  2. How important are the opinions of experts in the search for knowledge?

    Therefore, it is concluded that opinions of experts are irrelevant to the context of knowledge, because as explained earlier, an opinion might be knowledge to some, but not to all. It should also be considered that the opinions of experts could sometimes hinder someone's progress of searching for a piece of knowledge.

  1. How can we know when we have made progress in the search of knowledge?

    History and ethics go hand in hand. They both involve people acting on their morals and values and there are different views on it all around the world. Unlike ethics, we know when we have made progress in history by looking back at past events.

  2. How important are the opinions of experts in the search for knowledge?

    Such uncertainty is useful to lead other experts in doing research that eventually modifies previously established concepts. Experts do not have absolute answers to all questions and they do not teach things which should be dogmatically and uncritically accepted. Their opinions and postulates are constantly subject to criticism and modification, but this is exactly the way how scientific method works.

  1. Importance of experts

    History is the knowledge area in which man-kind depends on expert opinion the most. This is what makes it the greatest counter-argument to the importance of expert opinion in attaining knowledge. Experts merit such importance in history because, often times, there is no one to record an event save for

  2. In what ways may models help or hinder the search for knowledge?

    These assumptions lead to Boyle?s Law stating that if the volume of a gas is reduced by 50% then the pressure of the gas will double. (e.g. compressing air during a bicycle jump). Hypothetical minuscule elastic spheres were assumed to have mass and velocity similarly to billiard balls do although no color.

  1. Examine the Claim That It Is Possible to Attain Knowledge Despite Problems of Bias ...

    For example, the evolutionary theory ?Heliocentrism? was proposed by Mikolaj Kopernik in 16th century after his long time observation and deduction and he claimed that the Earth and planets actually revolve around a relatively stationary Sun at the center of the Solar System.

  2. TOK speech - Knowledge Issue: To what extent is the use of a dead ...

    and placed in the same tomb, along with many objects that person had used in his daily life, for the Egyptians believed that these objects would be needed in the next world. No- Catholics believe that God should have control over the body as it falls under his divine plan.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work