• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

How important are the opinions of experts in the search for knowledge?

Extracts from this document...


Essay Question: How important are the opinions of experts in the search for knowledge? Essay Topic 2. It is obvious that we all have opinions, and most of us agree that we are all entitled the right to have one and express it proudly, but are those opinions considered as sufficient evidence to consider them as guidance to knowledge or even knowledge itself? Alas, no. Knowledge -although cannot be limited by a definition since everyone will have his/her own interpretation of the word- is the sum of justified pieces of information that make up an undisputed fact for all to hold as true knowledge. To further discuss this question, I will evaluate the opinion of experts in the search for knowledge, as well as evaluating the case of the opinions of experts in three of the areas knowledge. Have we ever asked ourselves who is an expert? An expert is someone who has gained an enormous amount of experience and advanced knowledge on a given topic or issue. Thus, one might consider that this "expert" is a very reliable source of knowledge as he/she is qualified enough to give an experienced opinion on the knowledge issue. ...read more.


Simply because history is a narration of the past, thus opinions of experts are simply irrelevant, as they are not needed. But again, it is very interesting to note that history might not be the piece of 'Knowledge' itself, it is not the historical facts alone, but it is also the processing of such facts that forces us to create a fully immersive, coherent and meaningful interpretation of the past. This might call for the opinions of experts who are -most of the time- better than us in the process at hand. Nevertheless, as mentioned before, this so called 'expert' if he/she could not find anything to interpret from the given historical object or fact, evidences and background stories might be fabricated as mentioned above. War history is one place where we can express an example of such a case. For example, consider the Algerian war (1 November 1954 - 19 March 1962). In that war, casualties from the Algerian side were in an estimation of 1,500,000 deaths by the government's statistics, while estimations from historians were 960,000 deaths1. Clearly, something is wrong here, the difference between the two estimations is 540,000 deaths, which means that one of the two estimations is based on a false fact or alas, fabricated. ...read more.


-a strong supporter of supply-side policies- and Gunnar Myrdal (6 December 1898 - 17 May 1987) -a strong supporter of demand-side polices- shared a Nobel Prize for saying completely opposite theories!2 This is a clear indication that this area where the opinions of experts are needed. However, we must consider that not all opinions are 'true' and good enough to use, those opinions need to be justified and proved efficient. Unfortunately, for the case at hand, neither did supply side polices nor demand slide policies proved efficient as they both have pros and cons. To conclude, I 'believe' that the opinions of experts must be built on logical, coherent evidences, and since the evidence exists, opinions of experts in a given knowledge problem are not needed. However if no evidence existed, the fact might be simply fabricated or just 'believed' to be true with no evidence backing up its validity, or it simply might not have yet been proven. Until then, an unproven piece of information should not be considered true 'Knowledge'. Word count: 1552 words. 1 As found on Wikipedia: Algerian War: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Algerian_War 2 As found on "Economics - In terms of the good, the bad and the economist", IBID Press: Chapter 3.4: Demand side and supply side policies, page 374. ?? ?? ?? ?? 1 Name: Zeyad Samir Khayyat Class: IB-2 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our International Baccalaureate Theory of Knowledge section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related International Baccalaureate Theory of Knowledge essays

  1. How important are the opinions of experts in the search for knowledge?

    Another thing that I noticed was that expert opinion can also be a kind of hindrance when it comes to the natural sciences. We do experiments daily in our labs and our hypothesises are based on previously gained knowledge from experts.

  2. How can we know when we have made progress in the search of knowledge?

    In ethics, people use language to persuade people's moral belief and values. If an authoritive figure tells us something that we don't know, we are likely to believe what they tell us whether it's true or not because we may look up to the person that tells us.

  1. In what ways may models help or hinder the search for knowledge?

    Science, most often doesn?t recognize the line separating theoretical language from observational language; the distinction is relative to the situation and depends on the context. A close parallel between the interaction of metaphorical language and literal language can be made, there is a lack of division line between the two.

  2. Imagination is more important than knowledge. For knowledge is limited to all we now ...

    Slide and folder phones, which are released after bar phone is released, are invented in order to make more convenient mobile phone considering the strengths and weaknesses of an original mobile phone, bar phone. But these wireless mobile phones are also invented by imagining phones without wires which heavy, big, and non-portable telephone has got.

  1. How important are the opinions of experts in the search for knowledge?

    But is a physician always right? For our career we have to seek the expert guidance of a counselor. We approach him in good faith and follow his opinion to the letter. Thus opinions are very important. In the opinion of the moralists the more we torture the body the more we please the soul.

  2. Imagination is more important than knowledge. Discuss.

    the act or power of forming mental images of what is not actually present; the act or power of creating mental images of what has never been actually experienced, or of creating new images or ideas by combining previous experiences; creative power 1.

  1. Extended Essay. How do social class and gender affect the pursuit of happiness ...

    Jane could have done whatever it seemed to have to fit in with the people around her but she was never going to quite be at their level. And the fact that Jane knew that impacted many of her decisions.

  2. Imagination is more important than knowledge. For knowledge is limited to all we now ...

    Until and unless the person doesn?t acquire or is hungry to acquire knowledge, he won?t be able to imagine because that is where the power to manifest in you lies. If we look at the scenario from the psychological point of view of the person?s developing stage then there we get to unfold the reality of the Albert?s statement.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work