• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

There are no absolute distinctions between what is true and false. Discuss.

Extracts from this document...


There are no absolute distinctions between what is true and false: In the words of the great Heraclitus, ''a hidden connection is stronger than an obvious one''. This implies that the debate between truth and false is seemingly obvious but in a deeper context, sets us well on the way of uncovering hidden nuggets of thinking such as the mapping of our moral co-ordinates and negotiating our sense of individuality outside this impenetrable flux that characterises the world today. First, I am going to build my essay on an analogy of building a house. First I will lay the foundation by identifying the key variables in the essay- the true, the false and depending on the credibility of the distinctions, everything that lies between these two ends. Truth- its very meaning, pursuit, legitimacy and definition is, to a large extent, central to a huge bit of human intellectual development. We often quench this need for the truth by searching within a large variety of areas such as our community and principles prescribed by our religious and cultural beliefs. At the other end of the prism is what we know familiarly as all that is False. It is merely human tendency to polarise these two extremities and gauge the worth of all human activity in the manner similar to a touchstone where everything we do, or everything we know, or presume is either right or wrong. ...read more.


This assumption is critical to our conceptualisation of knowledge, as it is fundamentally this objectivity of truth that heightens the pursuit of knowledge; we can only acknowledge certain truths under the pretext that they conform to various prescribed standards. With one wall set up firmly, we move on to the next reading of the topic: 'there are no absolute distinctions between what is true and what is false'. Though this may not be as extreme as the previous reading, it still fails to delineate a way to distinguish between true and false. However, despite all its drawbacks, this topic is more appreciative of the possible implications of an objective truth. These eternal truths have not been chanced upon but rather have been settled upon after millennia of debate and reconsideration. In this scenario, we are comforted with the assurance that we may dispel fears long enough to act in a particular response by virtue of the 'universality' of the truth and knowledge being pursued. Moreover, the existence of an objective truth gives credence to the fact that some truths are preferred because they are the cumulative result of many generations of learning and experience. Now with the walls raised, I will go on to the roofing. I will try and evaluate this disjoint between objective and subjective truths using the various areas of knowledge and ways of knowing. ...read more.


Thus, there is a compromise between subjective and objective truth. Historians, rather than reporting actually 'speculate', 'interpret' and 'construct' opinion and context about events in the past. These various prejudices make it different to gauge the validity of historical conclusions. Man has been guilty on many counts for superstition and uncritical acceptance of historical data. In light of these facts can we call historical data undisputable? Most truths influenced by biases, limitations and subjection to external influences. Subjective influences undermine the objective interpretation of these historical conclusions. A historian always chooses sources that echo his personal prejudices. Although he may try to cast away personal biases an element of chauvinism is still prominent in most reports of history. We are also stuck in the dilemma such that it is nearly impossible to have all the evidence- there are always gaps that are irrecoverable or open to several opinions. History is not just about the facts but also the historian's interpretation, argument, evaluation- biases: assumptions rooted in personal, background, moral standards. History also has its political connotations and denotations. The victor and the downtrodden have a very varied account of historical events. Tactics such as censorship show political expediency and distortion of fact- the reluctance of mankind to get a grip on the truth but rather to tow the line. In such circumstances, knowledge and consent is not groomed rather it is manufactured through indoctrination. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our International Baccalaureate Theory of Knowledge section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related International Baccalaureate Theory of Knowledge essays

  1. How can different ways of knowing help us to distinguish between something that is ...

    Still, someone who is fluent can only be a master in certain areas - an Engineer may be terrible at biology and economics for example. Moreover, language can be translated; therefore the translation might change the meaning, which will lead to give a wrong meaning.

  2. A Discussion of the Understanding of Religion In the Lights of Relativity and Interpretation

    for his saying "Man is the Measure of All Things".Whether a room is objectively cold, then, can never really be known since the experience of being cold is entirely subjective. This same claim was extended to knowledge of the gods.

  1. How can the different ways of knowing help us to distinguish between something that ...

    know as a chemistry student that the test for hydrogen will always be a ?squeaky pop sound?, this is because I have tested this myself and I heard the sound a made.

  2. There are no distinctions between what is true and false, Discuss with relation to ...

    Finally, reason is used to draw ideas and suggestions together to draw a conclusion ? to present a truth. The Holocaust (World War 2) when almost six million Jews were killed is known to be one of the most tragic events in history.

  1. Knowledge is the true organ of sight, not the eyes". Discuss.

    You know that b***s are generally sports items, and you know that it is in a field, which is an area that you use to play in. It is our knowledge that leads us to recognise what we are seeing.

  2. Theory of Knowledge: There is no distinction between true or false. Discuss

    Minna says: ?The drama of life begins with a wail and ends with a sigh?. In this case, I can say that this is the time when theories are against the reality. Life is fine when everything runs smoothly. Everyone on earth expects to have everything works well but who can tell what lies ahead.

  1. Extended Essay. How do social class and gender affect the pursuit of happiness ...

    Jane is different from Catherine in the sense that she makes distinctions between love and happiness. For Catherine, she was focused on being with the man she truly loved. On the other hand, Jane did what proved to herself that she was independent.

  2. There are no absolute distinctions between what is true and what is false. Discuss

    Absolute truth may exist and we might know it. However, since we aren?t omniscient we can?t assume it?s absolute. Truth depends on the situation. If I say ?I?m blind? and the next day, it turned out that I?m not. What I considered to be true turned untrue, but maybe the next day it could be true again because of an accident.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work