In ethics, there are also traces of all three types of truth. Absolute truth may be portrayed in ethics in the belief that there is a universal set of ethics. For example, in every culture, killing for one's owns purpose is considered wrong. Also, ethical truth may be considered absolute if one chooses to believe that the rules by which we live never change. However, the truth in ethics may be viewed as relative, if viewed from the perception that the rules by which we ought to live vary from culture to culture. Furthermore, ethical truth may be considered relative if one considered the rules by which we live to be situational. For example, the Epicureans believed that the highest good in life was pleasure, but the greatest evil was pain or suffering. However, sometimes pleasure or happiness may later result in pain, so they would have to weigh out the consequences of their actions. This can be perceived as relative because in some situations, it would be acceptable to choose pleasure, but in others it would not. On the other hand, ethical truth may be viewed as subjective because one may have personal beliefs that govern what they believe is right and wrong.
In mathematics, for example, one could argue that the truth in mathematics is absolute because the laws/theorems of math are constant and unchanging. These laws/theorems are accepted widely and without doubts around the world. It is possible to algebraically prove certain identities and laws of mathematics. However, one could also argue that the truth in mathematics is relative because while theorems and laws of math exist, there are still limits to the theorems in most situations. For example, in the sine and cosine functions, the value of sin(x) must lie within the domain -1 < x < 1, so the sine function is only valid for a certain domain. This means that there are exceptions to truth in mathematics. It can also be said that there is a limit to truth in some mathematical cases, but truth always exists. On the other hand, one could also argue that the truth in mathematics is subjective because one must accept the laws of mathematics for them to exist. For example, if we people stop believing in the Pythagorean Theorem, we would also have to stop believing that every entity designed using the theorem doesn’t exist.
One evident difference between the arts and mathematics is that the final truth, according to the definition of truth being in correspondence with facts and reality, always exists in mathematics, but not always in the arts and the ethics. The truth is produced in mathematics solely through reasoning. On the contrary, it is easier to prove the ethics and the arts false rather than true through reasoning. For instance, people who believe that euthanasia is ethical believe that it is ‘right’ because they have their morals and emotions involved probably along with some experience. But for others it might be unethical since taking lives is already unethical. For another instance, an artist draws twenty moons for Earth as a painting. For any scientifically knowledgeable person, it would be easier for them to prove the artist’s perception wrong through the laws of gravity and geometry. However, the artist can argue that the correct truth is the meaning, not its feasibility. It must also be noted that the aim of the arts is to go beyond language whereas mathematics is a language that describes what is beyond us. Hence, it is easy to misinterpret the truth in the arts since the communication might be superfluous, whereas mathematics communicates with us in a limit, a limit where the human brain can understand and justify.
After considering truth in each case, a knowledge issue arises. Can a single truth in the arts ever exist? It is almost impossible for the world to come to a common perception towards a work of art, whether it is a painting or a play. It must be stated that every different interpretation of a piece of art is entangled with emotions. For instance, a priest might not find an R-rated movie appealing but some teenagers might. The priest might be involving his emotions along with his ethics to judge the movie and through this blend, interpreting the true meaning behind it.
In conclusion, this issue will live until the human life exists. Truth in arts differs for different individuals, but does exist. Hence, it can be safe to say that numerous truths exist in art but unlike mathematics, a common truth does not exist. Because of the different blend of emotions and perception around the world, a common judgment and agreement towards any art cannot be achieved.
Word Count: 1,275
Bibliography
"Math and Art: Differences and Similarities « Apperceptual." Apperceptual. N.p., 8 May 2009. Web. 19 Jan. 2010. <http://apperceptual.wordpress.com/2009/05/08/math-and-art-differences-and-similarities/>
"Truth - definition of Truth by the Free Online Dictionary, Thesaurus and Encyclopedia.." Dictionary, Encyclopedia and Thesaurus - The Free Dictionary. N.p., n.d. Web. 19 Jan. 2010. <http://www.thefreedictionary.com/Truth>.
"Truth in Mathematics, the Arts, and Ethics : Philosophy Forums." Philosophy Forums. N.p., n.d. Web. 11 Jan. 2010. <http://forums.philosophyforums.com/threads/truth-in-mathematics-the-arts-and-ethics-33905.html>.
"Truth - definition of Truth by the Free Online Dictionary, Thesaurus and Encyclopedia."
<http://www.thefreedictionary.com/Truth>
"Truth in Mathematics, the Arts, and Ethics : Philosophy Forums."
"Truth in Mathematics, the Arts, and Ethics : Philosophy Forums."
<http://forums.philosophyforums.com/threads/truth-in-mathematics-the-arts-and-ethics-33905.html>.
"Math and Art: Differences and Similarities « Apperceptual."
<http://apperceptual.wordpress.com/2009/05/08/math-and-art-differences-and-similarities/>