To what extent is truth different in mathematics, the arts and the ethics?

Authors Avatar


            Truth is defined as an entity that corresponds to reality or facts, where the statement or conformity is verified and accepted widely by people and the rules of the universe. Mathematics is the study of the relationships among numbers, shapes, and quantities. The Arts are the creation of works that creates an emotional response within both the artist and the viewer(s). Finally, the ethics are the morals and principles that guide individuals in life. One question that arises is whether "truth" means exactly the same for each of the Areas of Knowledge, whether the rules, procedures and conditions are similar enough to warrant our truth for each Area of Knowledge. And the answer to the question is no, as truth is different in mathematics, the arts and the ethics. Moreover, truth is defined differently for each case. And thus the Knowledge Claim is put forward that even though truth exists differently in mathematics, the arts and the ethics, the extent is common between the three.  

To understand truth, one must dwell into it completely since philosophically, truth is more than mathematics, the arts and the ethics, and these areas of knowledge cannot exist without truth. Furthermore, to make the differentiation of truth easy, truth can be divided into absolute, relative and subjective. But the truth exists in these areas differently. In the arts, absolute truth may be represented when experts determine what is considered to be beautiful. Also, absolute truth in the arts could be seen in Plato's Theory of the World of Ideas . The World of Ideas evidently holds the ideal, perfect form of entities on earth, and everything on earth is based upon its form in the world of ideas, but with some slight variations or mutations. Hence, truth is absolute because the most beautiful or perfect art would come closest to portraying things in their ideal form. However, I believe that truth in the arts may also be considered relative because in our world, the quality or beauty of something varies between time periods and cultures.   For example, during the Renaissance, the ideal figure of a woman was more heavyset than what is considered to be the ideal figure of a woman in the 21st century. On the other hand, truth in the arts can also be viewed as subjective in the sense that individuals are free to decide what is beautiful. In addition, it must not be disregarded that the arts are always judged through emotions, and since emotions are one Ways of Knowing that is considered to be least promising when it comes to determining the final truth, the determination of truth for different individuals will vary accordingly.

Join now!

In ethics, there are also traces of all three types of truth. Absolute truth may be portrayed in ethics in the belief that there is a universal set of ethics. For example, in every culture, killing for one's owns purpose is considered wrong. Also, ethical truth may be considered absolute if one chooses to believe that the rules by which we live never change. However, the truth in ethics may be viewed as relative, if viewed from the perception that the rules by which we ought to live vary from culture to culture. Furthermore, ethical truth may be considered relative ...

This is a preview of the whole essay