• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

What is it about theories in the human sciences and natural sciences that make them convincing

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

TOK Essay 2/2011 Question: What is it about the theories in the human sciences and natural sciences that makes them convincing? Name: Valerie Ng Suying TOK group: P1b (Mr Eric Lau) Index Number: 20 It is widely assumed that natural and human sciences provide a reliable form of knowledge about the world, whether about natural phenomena or the behavior of individuals or a society. Statistics have shown that people have a high level of confidence in the scientific community. Scientists and their scientific theories are usually placed above leaders of other institutions such as business leaders, religious leaders, or elected officials (americanprogress.org). However, scientific theories are not completely certain and may not always provide an accurate view of the world. They are fallible and are subjected to change. So what is it in the theories of the human and natural sciences that makes them so convincing? Why do people have such high regard for them to the extent that some have begun to take them for granted as being true? This essay will attempt to discuss theories in the natural sciences followed by theories in the human sciences. To begin, it is important to define the key terms, namely 'scientific theories' and 'convincing'. ...read more.

Middle

In chemistry, mathematics is needed to calculate the concentrations of solutions in moles. Even in ancient Greek, "many sophisticated understandings of our Solar System were based on the Greeks' strong grasp of geometry". (e-education.psu.edu) Mathematics is deemed as the most certain area of knowledge to many. Although not necessarily true, it is believed to provide absolute truth and since it is the basis of scientific theories, people tend to be convinced by them. For example, the scientific community did not accept Michael Faraday's electromagnetic field theory because no mathematical terms were able to provide any convincing explanation at that time. James Maxwell later provided the necessary mathematical equations to justify Faraday's theory, which was then accepted (Lau). Thus, theories in the natural sciences are convincing because mathematics is the foundation of it. While theories in natural sciences are convincing due to the nature of the scientific method and procedure, theories in human sciences are much more complex. The human sciences are the study of the human behavior. Though both the natural and human sciences require the same methodology, i.e. observation and experimentation, theories about the way humans behave tend to be less consistent as every individual is different. ...read more.

Conclusion

As a result, the selling prices for new cars will increase significantly, making them more expensive to potential buyers (todayonline.com). Consumer reaction is to seek cheaper alternatives, i.e. used car market, driving the demand for used cars and prices up. In this example, buyers used past COE supply and price trends to anticipate prices of new cars and have responded as predicted by the market theory by seeking cheaper alternatives in the used car market. Although the above point generally applies to other areas of knowledge (AoKs) such as ethics, art and religion, the key characteristic that separates scientific theories from theories in other AoKs is the process of rigorous proofing and falsification, thus arriving at fairly coherent results. No other AoK shares this unique feature: history cannot be proven; mathematical axioms cannot be proven invalid. Due to this characteristic, scientific theories have that persuasive ability. Hence, when a theory corresponds to the society's experiences or actions, the theory naturally becomes even more convincing. In summary, repeatability and reproducibility of the scientific method makes theories in the natural sciences convincing. Also, mathematics as the foundation provides greater persuasive power to scientific theories. While theories in the human sciences are much more complicated, the same set of criteria can be applied to them as well. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our International Baccalaureate Theory of Knowledge section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

or


Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related International Baccalaureate Theory of Knowledge essays

  1. TOK Mathematics and Sciences Essay

    it can be considered as certain as it has gone through the process of rigorous proof. This concept of absolute certainty does not flow into all mathematical concepts which are more complex because most of these concepts are proved using statements which are assumed to be true called axioms.

  2. To what extent is truth different in mathematics, ethics and natural sciences?

    We have the justification to believe that something is the way it is and also the proof in real life examples. It would be reasonable to assume that since human sciences are something that is closer to us, we would be more certain of the truth we can find there.

  1. Arts and Sciences essay

    Perception is known to be very subjective regardless of the sense because different people have different abilities and tastes. We know perception is subjective because one person might perceive something different from his/her acquaintance. For instance, in the movie A Beautiful Mind, the protagonist Nash has taken drugs therefore he hallucinates.

  2. "...we will always learn more about human life and human personality from novels than ...

    personality which is implied in Chomsky's quote, but only then if the questions in the survey are numerous and possible answers extensive. The main weakness of this research method is that it is impossible to gain knowledge of past civilizations as scientific psychology is relatively modern compared to fictional literature.

  1. In the natural sciences progress can be made, but in the arts this is ...

    However, it doesn?t necessarily work that way. Instead new scientific theory replaces the old and shifts the paradigm to our perception of reality. The revolutions in science are often refused in societal approval. A branch of neuroscience, phrenology is associated with the reputable idea of localization of the brain in which certain brain regions are responsible for particular behaviors.

  2. Knowledge gives us a sense of who we are. To what extent is this ...

    Although these experiments and many others, to a large extent, do accurately provide a sense of how humans behave in public, I feel that such studies erroneously generalize human identity in terms of how they behave in society but this doesn?t provide a concrete sense of who one really is at the core.

  1. Describe the development of a scientific theory, highlighting the process involved. Differentiate between ...

    how advanced technology it is we will never have the opportunity to travel to another dimension and we do not have the understanding for that as well.. Science is unable to answer philosophical and ethical answers due to there are based on opinion not experiment and do not have a

  2. Human sciences - the language of questionnaires

    These students were divided into three groups. The first group was asked "How fast were the cars going when they hit each other?", the second group was asked "How fast were the cars going when they smashed each other?" and finally the third group was not interrogated regarding the vehicle's speed.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work