Reflections on "Miss Julie" in a cultural context

Authors Avatar by happy954 (student)

Reflections on Miss Julie in a cultural context

The following reflections were written by students as ISSR, International School of the

Stockholm Region, in Stockholm. The students at ISSR attend the International Baccalaureate

Diploma Programme, a rigorous, international high school programme in English (see

http://ibo.org/diploma/ for more information about the IB DP). In the IB DP, all students need

to take one course in which they study literature in the language in which they are the most

academically competent. This course is referred to as Language A: Literature. The students

who wrote the reflections below take English as their best language.

In the IB DP all courses are examined externally, meaning that the teachers do not set the

students grades. This means that there are some assignments which all teachers are required to

carry out with their students. One of them is the Written Assignment, where the students

partake in a number of activities and then write an essay about a literary work translated from

another language than the one that they study as their best language. In English, we have

studied, among other works, August Strindberg’s Miss Julie. The first activity in the Written

Assignment process is the interactive oral – that is, a group discussion about the work

focusing on its cultural context, which is then followed by the writing of reflections. Below

are the instructions from the IB Language A: Literature guide:

Stage 1: The interactive oral

The interactive oral is a focused class discussion in which all students and the teacher participate.

Each student should be responsible for initiating some part of the discussion in at least one of the

interactive orals for one work. Students may participate as a group or individually, and teachers may

organize the discussion in a variety of different ways.

The discussions should address the following cultural and contextual considerations.

 In what ways do time and place matter to this work?

 What was easy to understand and what was difficult in relation to social and cultural context

and issues?

 What connections did you find between issues in the work and your own culture(s) and

experience?

 What aspects of technique are interesting in the work?

Formal requirements

At least one oral must be completed in relation to each work studied in part 1.

The suggested minimum time for discussion of each work is 30 minutes.Mikael Hansén Goobar October 2012

ISSR Stockholm

2

Stage 2: The reflective statement

The reflective statement is a short writing exercise and should be completed as soon as possible

following the interactive oral. Each student is asked to provide a reflection on each of the interactive

orals. The reflective statement on the same work as the student’s final assignment is submitted for

assessment.

The reflective statement must be based on the following question.

 How was your understanding of cultural and contextual considerations of the work developed

through the interactive oral?

Formal requirements

Length 300–400 words. If the limit is exceeded, assessment will be based on the first

400 words.

The texts you find in this document are reflective statements produced by my (Mikael Hansén

Goobar) students in English A: Literature. The statements have not been edited except for

spelling errors, as I feel that editing them to much would counteract the point of including

student examples. Have a good read!Mikael Hansén Goobar October 2012

ISSR Stockholm

3

Miss Julie - Reflective statement

In our interactive oral about the play Miss Julie the group that I was in talked about a number

of things including, how Julie and Jean’s relationship grows throughout the play, the roles of

different classes in the play and the meaning of having French in the play. The topic that

caught my eye most was how Julie and Jean’s relationship grows through the play and also

how the French was used between Miss Julie and Jean.

Jean has been in love with Julie since she was small but she has never really seen him. After

Miss Julie’s fiancé had left her she became more desperate and because of that she turned to

the lower class people like Jean. Jean is therefore trying to keep Miss Julie’s reputation up and

not letting her sink to “servant level”. When Jean does this he is playing with fire and could

lose his job. In theory Jean might also have sex fantasies about Miss Julie; if he had sex with

her then he could say that he is “closer” to his goal of becoming higher-class. Maybe Jean is

Join now!

only using Julie to get to higher-class; maybe there is no love at all.

The language in the play was mixed a little bit. Some French words came in at random

moments and Jean does speak French quite allot with Miss Julie. The French at that time had

begun as a higher-class language but then dropped to lower class throughout time. Because

Jean speaks good French this is a good way for Julie to communicate with him without

Kristin really knowing what they are saying. At the time of the play Kristin has fallen asleep

...

This is a preview of the whole essay