Defence At Kenilworth

        There were many defensive features at Kenilworth castle. The first and most prominent was Mortimer’s tower (see source 1). This was a gatehouse/barbican. It had two towers and was D-shaped. The evidence for a portcullis was gate hinge blocks  (holes on one side), there were grooves for the portcullis in the walls and grooves and gate hinges. There was also a fireplace and a latrine which indicates the structure was garrisoned with soldiers. I know that Mortimer’s tower would’ve been defended by arrow fire because there were arrow slits. Long bow for long range and cross bow for a short and powerful range. This was to protect the lake. The range from the right of Mortimer’s tower was out to link with the outer wall. The range from the left was straight out in front and short range down one side. There used to be a back up line of fire from the outer curtain wall. The outer curtain wall is now missing though so we can only make an educated guess. We know Mortimer’s tower had two stories because of the line of bricks and the fireplace on the left. The things that are there now and wouldn’t have been in previous centuries are the stone at the front, level of earth, grates, signs, fences and the ticket office.

        The next defensive structures are the outer curtain wall including the Constable’s Lodging and Tudor Stables. There was an opening in the wall. I know this is not an arrow slit because it is not angled to prevent the archer getting shot. There is also no need for defence here because of the mere. I know that the wall would be higher because there is always another floor above fishtail arrow slits and battlements are one man tall. I think this would be 30ft tall. I can tell that the Constable’s Lodging was not built primarily for defence because of the big windows with ornate frames; it has thin walls and a fireplace inside. The buttress was a defensive structure to stop undermining (see source 2). I think the Constable’s Lodging would’ve been three stories high (45ft). I think this because of the brick lines and the fireplaces. The evidence of defence by arrow fire is the 1240 style arrow loops. We know the roof of the Tudor stables is from a different period from the rest of the curtain wall structures because there is hardly any defence. There are new bricks on the buttressing.

Join now!

        Another defensive structure was Lunn’s tower. There is a rubbish chute and a guard robe, which is evidence of habitation. I know this structure would’ve been defended by arrow fire because of the crossbow slit and pour down fishtail. I know it had two stories because there would’ve been another story above the fishtail arrow silt. The other defensive features I saw were buttressing, thick walls, brick lines and a round tower (see source 3).

        Along the curtain wall was a moat originally filled with water. We know the wall has been altered since it was first built because ...

This is a preview of the whole essay