• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Animal Testing Argument.

Extracts from this document...


Animal Testing Argument Vivisection is described in the dictionary as: The practice of performing operations on live animals for the purpose of experimentation or scientific research (used by those opposed to such work). Vivisection literally means the 'cutting up' of living animals, but has now become more generally used as the term for all experiments on living animals (in vivo) as many animal experiments, such as toxicity tests, will not involve surgical procedures. Vivisection is used in laboratories across the world as a 'humane' way of testing products on animals before they are sold to the public. I am strongly against this barbaric excuse of scientific research as it contradicts all that has been worked for in today's world...the right to equality, whatever the situation whether human or animal. One argument for is that humans are more important than animals. This, I'm sorry, seems utterly absurd. To classify a race that causes wars, mass deaths and in-tolerance to other creeds as more important than animals who cause little damage to the world seems naive. ...read more.


(Quote taken from The Guardian newspaper published 8/12/1998) Science...moral? Two words that don't seem to fit in the same sentence. Science is to blame for most of the world's fear and suffering. A b**b, nuclear missiles, gases are all the splendid work of our friend science. Science is used today as nothing more than a beauty parlour for the superficial individuals who spend lavishly on cosmetics and luxuries not flinching an eyelid at the suffering that was endured for that pot of makeup. Another question raised for vivisection is Isn't it true that every major medical advance in the last century was a result of animal experimentation? Surprise, surprise the answer is...NO. Since the inception of the Nobel Prize for Physiology and Medicine in 1901, two thirds of the prizes have been awarded to scientists using various 'alternative' technologies, not animal experiments. In fact, results derived from animal experiments have had a very minimal effect on the dramatic rise in life expectancy in the 20th century. According to the Centres for Disease Control (CDC), the rise in life expectancy can be attributed mainly to changes in lifestyle, environmental factors, and improvements in sanitation and ...read more.


Variables are easily changed to produce volumes of data. In the publish-or-perish world of science, vivisection offers limitless opportunities for publication. Animal-based research is the science of the past. There are a number of alternatives available to modern researchers which are less expensive, more reliable and ethically sound. Studies performed in the test-tube (in vitro) have many advantages over animal experiments. They provide results rapidly; experimental parameters are easily controlled; and their focus on the cellular and molecular levels of the life process provides more useful information about how chemicals and drugs work or cause damage. Clinical and epidemiological studies are a vast source of data. They have provided us with more useful information about the nature of disease in our world than any other source. Modern computer technology has vastly improved our ability to analyze the huge volume of incredibly complex data available to us by studying the course of disease throughout the world. Cell and tissue cultures, CAT, PET, and MRI scans, quantitative structure-activity relationship analysis in drug design, and chemical toxicity assays are some of the modern approaches to research available to scientists today. We must ask ourselves why we rely on the science of yesterday. Daniel Black English Coursework ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our University Degree Zoology section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related University Degree Zoology essays

  1. The Hare and the Tortoise - The Modern Day Version

    most sports injuries arise from inadequate preparation and abrupt starts and stops. With cheering throngs on either side, the hare sped down the course like quicksilver. By the time he was out of town and in the countryside, he had long lost sight of his competitor.

  2. Is Animal Testing ethically right

    This required 200 species of a certain animal to be force fed different amounts of a new drug until exactly half of them died. However this test may be used in exceptional circumstances also now the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development says that if a new drug kills

  1. Cloning argument

    Even more exciting is the possibility of cloning animals who have been genetically engineered to be immune to certain diseases. For instance, a cow could be developed which is immune from mad cow disease. This cow could be cloned thousands upon thousands of times, reducing the risk of the dangerous disease in the food supply.

  2. Review and discuss the significance of animal cloning (such as: Dolly the sheep)

    The expression of human antigens in pigs could alleviate organ shortages by minimizing or eliminating the rejection of pig organs transplanted into humans. However, other barriers such as the possibility of transmitting viruses from pigs to humans must be overcome.

  1. Using the Grounded Theory to explore people's views on animal use: What factors influence ...

    It seems apparent that there is a theme relating to the concept 'out of sight out of mind'. This refers to the participant either having a vast amount of knowledge on animal use or the participant avoiding issues concerning animal use because they know that they are not going to

  2. Animal Testing

    (Alternatives to Animal testing on the Web: FAQs) Those who support animal testing argue that the society has an obligation to take actions in ways that will minimize injury and maximize benefits. Banning or restraining the experimentation on animals would not allow society to achieve such results.

  1. Animal Experimentation

    Lord Hunt said that while the government endorsed the right to democratic protest, it condemned the violent attacks and harassment that had been witnessed in recent years. "Most medical research does not use animals. Whenever possible, alternatives such as cell cultures, tissues, computers, bacteria and plants are used instead," he said.

  2. Tasmanian Devil Facial Tumor Disease

    Allograft theory of disease transmission Initially, the way the devils were contracting the disease was unknown, until the idea of it being transmitted by allograft came about in 2006 (Pearce & Swift, 2006). The allograft theory is the name given to the idea that cancerous cells from one Tasmanian devil are transmitted and infect another devil just by biting.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work