Football and Politics
According to Baudrillard, ‘politics is no longer restricted to the political sphere, but infects every sphere-like economics, science, art, sport.. and sport itself, meanwhile, is no longer located in sport as such, but instead in business, in sex, in politics, in the general style of performance’. The argument Baudrillard wants to explain is, that politics nowadays actually enters all parts of our social life. In order to regulate sport there is need of a government. Moreover since governments are the ruling legislators in a country, politicians throughout the world use sports in whatever manner they consider more appropriate.
On the other hand Baudrillard extends his critique to sports. Nowadays there are to many interest governing sports. Today we know that the date and hour of every important final are set together with media representatives, who pay large amounts of money in order to attract TV audience. A quite famous example took place in the final of the last world cup, which took part in France. It is known that Ronaldo, one of the most famous players in the world was not feeling well. Many people say he was “forced “ to play the game anyway because of increasing pressure by his personal sponsor (NIKE), and the insistence of representatives of the Brazilian association of football.
In Europe we have seen that the idea of sports combined with a message of political consciousness has received some support. Most famous are the examples of the anti-racist campaigns of professional players, certain clubs, and fans. One known example of a campaign was the undershirt inscription of support for unemployed dock workers in Liverpool by English international and Liverpool player Robbie Fowler in 1997 Another famous example was the banner of the Swiss national team before a 1996 international match calling for an end to French nuclear testing in the South Pacific.
After the collapse of the European colonial rule in the nineteenth century in South America, the idea of nationhood has been consolidated in the twentieth century (Del Burgo, 1995: pg 60). The idea of cultural elites was that of the nation which is ‘imagined, created, and constructed’ (Anderson, 1983). Within this framework football had its important role. In fact football became intertwined with discourses of statehood and the search for national, political and cultural identities. A famous historian called Eric Hobsbawn once said:’ The imagined community of millions seems more real as a team of eleven named people.’ According to Hobsbawn the cultural production of football is able to seize the popular imagination and arouse nationalistic tendencies more concretely than other realms of cultural and political construction. Furthermore, football seems to appeal as a general sport concerning everyone, as compared to sports like golf, tennis or cycling, which is considered to be rather ‘snobbish’. In fact to play football you just need a ball. Many times it happens when the ball is missing it would be substituted with anything which is round and which could be kicked.
Unfortunately since sports reflect the views and opinion of society, it was affected by the various cultures. For example in Paraguay the state of women in society was reflected in football. In 1979 Politicians from Paraguay banned women from playing football, declaring it was contrary to the natural femminity of women. In fact in regions like South America males dominate football. However the trend seems to be changing where in Brazil we find women playing football. If we continue speaking about the example of South America we can say that football acts as the great societal equalizer able to provide popular expressions of celebration and pride when national teams win. Alternatively these celebrations can turn up to become emotions of national gloom, and mourning. It is not rare to hare about suicides after crucial defeats.
Every population has different concepts of what a nation is. This concept varies even between people of the same population. However emotions linked with the colours of the flag of a nation, national anthems and the nervous anticipation before the game starts is a common theme to almost everyone. As many other things football has been manipulated by politicians. For example in South America, Football together with other sports has been manipulated to achieve certain scopes. According to Arbena these scopes are:
- The establishment of domestic physical education programs, football competitions and permanent institutions necessary to run football programs,
- The preparation of teams and individuals capable of competing successfully on the international level.
- The hosting of international football events.
We can understand why football has become so important in South America. More than being a game for all and being a spectacular game, football was used by politicians to achieve certain social objectives, which helped in uniting a nation, and bringing all the population united under one flag. The argument of Arbena continues by saying that many politicians in this region believed that the aim of football was to build a nation from within and gain it legitimacy from without.
Many times however, hosting of the games by nations has tried to give a false image of the country. This meant that politicians pushed for hosting World cup finals in their countries. This would have had an enormous impact on these countries economy. However some times this was wrongly predicted. A good example of this happened in Argentina in 1978. According to Glanville, the 1978 World Cup victory for Argentina did not bring long lasting economic prosperity, establish social and political peace, or save the military junta from its eventual demise. On the contrary it was widely celebrated by the military regime and a veritable cross-section of social classes and cultural groups within the nation. According to Paz this search of politicians to use football to bind a nation is very strange. According to him there exists common linguistics, literary, and colonial traditions, which would bind more than separate.
The manipulation of football by politicians, generals, and authoritarian military regimes in order to maintain existing power relations has been legendary. It is common to hear that the first two Italian victories of Italy in the World Cups, were bought by Italy, since Mussolini (Italian Dictator of the time) was particularly interested in Italy showing to the world their power. In fact, historically, socialist, fascist, authoritarian and liberal democratic regimes have all manipulated sport in order to preserve the status quo and project an international image of superiority vis-à-vis other nations and ideological system. Putting the argument of football aside, it is known to everyone the enormous rivalry, which repeated itself in every Olympic games and international meeting of Athletics between U.S.A and former U.S.S.R. Also the various people who were in power justified their increased involvement in sports for the following reasons. According to Arbena, (1989) the argument was, that football and physical education in general can teach’ constructive’ values improve health and morals, aid the capitalist economy, reduce crime, develop nations of community and cooperation, and promote patriotism/nationalism.
After a Brazilian World Cup victory in 1970 Kapuscinski quoted an exiled Brazilian colleague: “ The military right wing can be assured of at least five more years of peaceful rule”. In this quotation we can see the tie there is between the achievements in sports and politics. Victory in international competition brings joy and peace throughout a country. This helps the various governments to impose their regime without creating disorder. Obviously this has a limit but this sound like when in the old times one used to take some sugar to accompany a bitter syrup which had to be taken.
In times of political disorder stadiums, were transformed in sorts of Coliseums. In El Salvador, the national stadium has even been used to carry out televised, nation-wide assassinations against political opponents (Kapuscinski, 1990:p 185).In the past months we all realized about the executions, which the Taliban regime used to perform in the stadiums of Afghanistan. Here also the talibans prohibited football players to play in traditionally Shorts and shirts. They were obliged to wear tights as to cover there legs. These forms of extremism, spilled over sports. In this case, football. Moreover, since women were regarded as inferior to men they were not permitted to follow games.
In Europe, stadiums were used as to control real, imagined, or projected internal and external threats. If we consider the example of an external threat the following example could be use. In the beginning of the 1990, Albanian refugees were grouped and detained at the football stadium of Bari (Italy). According to Weiner ,this was done since the European Union(EU) had created a consensus that basic challenges to political, social, economic, and cultural values presented especially by the influx of Muslim immigrants, asylum-seekers, illegals, and workers.
In Europe the mentality to win at all costs has brought in various aspects. Notoriously the violence that occurs in stadiums between spectators. We see that, spectators need to be controlled thoroughly. As said before stadiums have become Roman Coliseums with barbed wire and guards patrolling the edifices inside and outside. Now and then people are unfortunately killed, trampled on and beaten, either for revenge or since the celebration got out of hand. Some famous examples are the one of Heysel Stadium tragedy in Brussels, where about forty fans were killed. This happened before the European clubs cup final between Juventus and Liverpool. In 1987 the match between Real Madrid and Naples was played in a completely empty stadium as a result of the disciplinary measures taken by FIFA in response to the hooligan excesses of Madrid supporter at an earlier game.
According to Baudrillard, these patterns of ‘ controlled’ football represent a cynical political bias towards the obliteration of the social realm. According to him football hooliganism symbolizes an extreme transpolitical phenomenon. This phenomenon is that spectators transgress the assigned limits of their role as passive watchers and invent their own media spectacle. What happens is that hooligans carry participants to an ultimately tragic limit. This is a form of violence, which is meant to show the state, that they do not have a monopoly in the use of violence. At the same time, these acts are giving the opportunity to the state to respond with its own violence. So for these reasons Baudrillard considers football as a metastatic phenomenon par excellence. That is the transfer of a bodily social, political or psychological disease from one organ to another.
If we consider once more the South American context we can see the following. The Brazilian and Argentinean military regimes of the recent past provide us with the most classical and conspicuous examples of connections between football, the maintenance of the status quo, and the fostering of national consciousness. According to Janet Lever, this has clearly demonstrated how the Brazilian military government of the 1960’s used the national game of football in order to instill in its inhabitants a notion of the nation’s vast geographical terrain. This was done since many remote regions of Brazil were unknown to its urban citizens. What was done therefore was to implement a sport lottery. This was done by the military regime in order to enhance national consciousness, raise funds for social projects, and include football results from distant provinces(Lever, 1983-88 p 85-96)
The various population of South America made many arguments. In fact emotions like disdain were expressed for regimes, which channeled funds for the World Cup in order to gain a boost in public relations. This disdain was expressed since other aspects of life like poverty, unemployment, rural exploitation and fiscal government corruption were not tackled. Football has also been by politicians in the recent past. In 1989 Carlos Menem appeared at the national stadium dressed in the National colours. He also publicly endorsed club side River Plate. In 1996, Nelson Mandela was a t the national stadium to celebrate the victory of the first, multi-racial South African against Tunisia in the final of the African Nations Cup.
It is also common that sports are a matter of influence for politics. One of the most obvious examples refers to Silvio Berlusconi. Already president Of A.C Milan , managed to become Prime Minister of the Italian government. The name of his political party is ‘Forza Italia’ (Come on Italy), which is a reminiscent of a football chant. Also Nigeria victory in football at the Olympic games of Atlanta in1996 gave rise to the government to declare a public national holiday. Something similarly happened in Jamaica when the Jamaican team (called Reggae Boys’) qualified for its first appearance in the 1998 World Cup in France.
In the southeastern Beirut a football club called Ahid, which means ‘covenant’ in Arabic, exists. This team is associated with the Hezbollah. These are Iranian-backed resistance force. Hezbollah managed to obtain its dark image in the days of the civil war when Hezbollah men kidnapped westerners and blew up barracks of western forces. There aim is to drive Israel out of occupied southern Lebanon. Ahid is not just a football team. Deborah Horan interviewed a supporter of this team. She asked this supporter why he was supporting the team. His answer was that he believed in the team. The team’s colour matched the resistance flag. These were black and yellow. The only difference between the flag and the team colours were that the flag had the image of a machine gun. This football team Ahid is one of the proofs that Hezbollah is trying to change its Iranian identity. The way they are trying to change their image is through football.
Football and Politics in Malta
Football in Malta is considered to be the ‘National game’. Everyone in Malta follows football. What is strange is that it is true that football enters the lives of the Maltese daily, but the problem stands with the lack of affection that there is for the national league in General and mainly the national team. It is true that Games, which are played between Valletta and Birkirkara, attract big crowds. However the reasons for this attendance may be attributed to particular factors. Low attendance spectators characterize the rest of the games. With recent raise in price of ticket entrance the spectators declined even more. Last November I attended a game between Sliema and Floriana. I was astonished the see the low attendance. Considering that these two teams have been rivals through ages, and that won a big proportion of the championships played in Malta.
As what regards the national football team things seem to be worse. Even though recently some positive signs have emerged, at least as what regards the way the Maltese play, the notion is that the Maltese team is bound to lose all the games it will play. This is why most of the Maltese citizens side for a foreign National team, mainly Italy, England, Brazil and Germany. At least some satisfactions can be achieved by siding for these themes. The reasons for people siding for these themes can be derived by the history of Malta and its politics. As everyone knows Malta was a British colony officially until 1964, even though the British troops remained in Malta until 1979. The British came to Malta in 1800. The emergence of sports in Malta was due to the British colonialism. One of the first Maltese clubs to be established is the Equality club. As the name suggests anti-colonial atmosphere was created in Malta and this team was to show everyone that the Maltese were certainly not inferior to the British.
The main issue at this time when this club was established was culture and particularly language. At the time Maltese was not yet developed as a written language. The language governing the courts and of the church was Italian. When local teams played against British teams the ant-British feeling emerged greatly. The British were not just the opponents but also the patrons. So at this point in time two coalitions were formed. On one side there were the pro-Italians and on the other side the pro-British. This was reflected on both the issues of the language and on football. The exponents of these two coalitions were the Nationalist Party and the Constitutional party, which later became known as the Labour party. The Nationalist were in favour of Italy whilst the Constitutional party in favour of the British.
The tradition today is still present that basically half the population sides for the English football team whilst the other half sides for the Italian football league. The beginning of this strange act was in 1933 when there was a game between Italy and England played in Rome. This single event can still be found nowadays. I can still remember the last victory of Italy against t England tin one of the qualifying rounds for France 98. When Gianfranco Zola scored the goal I could hear several horns from cars and people screaming from all over the street. Today it is still said known that Italian supporters are nationalist whilst English supporters are pro Labour Party. However this distinction is not clear-cut as it was in the olden times.
Before the beginning of the war prominent of the nationalist were deported to Uganda. Moreover those who remained were not that convinced of their ideal. On the other hand many people thought that if Britain had not been in Malta probably, it would not have been attacked and would not suffer the consequences. Finally by the late 1950s both parties were convinced and concerned of having independence. Prior this time discussion took place as to be integrated with Italy or with Britain.
Governments in Malta started taking sports seriously into consideration in 1981. At the time the Labour government had just been elected. This stands until today in Ta Qali. The labour government ideals are socialist ideal. In fact according to their views the state needs to have a dominant role in a country. The state is able to promote better the interests of everyone as compared to a liberal idea, which sustains the contrary. So the Labour government wanted to spread socialism through sport. In fact what it first did was to try and take over the running of the game. At this time the Minister of sports was an exponent of the labour party whilst the president of the MFA (Malta Football Association) was an exponent of the Nationalist Party. This brought extreme clashes between the two. The battles between the two were only solved when the president of the MFA was substituted with an exponent of the Labour Party.
In August 2001, the first White paper concerning sports was written. This was an attempt by the government to have written rules concerning spots in Malta. This was done in order to encourage the growth of sport in the country. This shows the will of the government to make sports prosper in the country. However up to today the notion of the Maltese is that the international standards are really far away and the opinion is that Malta will never be able to compete in international level. In my opinion, all these talks and proposal of laws are all, good things, which the governments do in order to get the sympathy of the electorate.
To sum up according to the arguments I have exposed in this assignment football and politics cannot exist without reference to each other. This happened internationally and locally throughout history where, the dictators and various governments of all over the world, from the most liberal to the most authoritarian have always been interested in sports. This was and is mainly done as a way to show the rest of the world of the strength of that particular country. Moreover sports appeals to a great majority of people. In a democratic society governments are elected by the citizens and should express the will of the majority of the people. This brings us to the sort of importance politicians give to sport. On the other hand sports is obviously regulated by politics and therefore needs the assistance of the government. Many times the sports judiciary is not competent for certain things that happen during sports facilities. Also in this case sport is dependent on the ordinary jurisprudence.
Bibliography
“Anthropology of Sports” Eduardo P. Archetti, University Of Oslo , Department of Anthropology.
An Annootated Bibliography of Latin American Sport,: Pre-Conquest to the present, Arbena,Joseph(1989)
Sport and Society in Latin America. Westport, Ct: Greenwood Press. Arbena, Joseph (1988).
Football Cultures and identities , Armstrong, G. and Giulianotti, R (eds) (1998) MacMillan: Basingstoke.
The Transparency of Evil: Essays in Extreme Phenomena.Baudillard,Jean (1993) London: Verso Books.
Football in Sun and Shadow. London:Forth State, Galeano, Eduardo(1995)
“ Parallel developments in sport and politics”, Speech by Harry Edwards, professor in sociology at University of California, Berkeley.
The story of the world cup. London: Faber , Glanville, Brian(1993).
The Soccer war . London: Granada Publishing limited Kapuscinski, Ryszard (1990).
Internet web sites
www . africaonline.com/site/Articles/1,3,38531.jsp
www. Israelinsider.com/channels/articles/pol_0084.html
www.ireland.com/sports/soccer.
(Lever, 1983 and 1988; p 85-96)
