• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

If you were participating in an experiment, would you object to being deceived? How concerned would you be about invasion of privacy? Under what circumstances, if any, would you regard it as ethical to use animals in medical experiments? Psychology

Extracts from this document...


Subject: If you were participating in an experiment, would you object to being deceived? How concerned would you be about invasion of privacy? Under what circumstances, if any, would you regard it as ethical to use animals in medical experiments? Psychology experiments? Teaching laboratories? Product testing? Entertainment? 'Ever since the Gulf War, an estimated 20.000 returning U.S. soldiers have been experiencing a series of mysterious illnesses, such as severe joint pain, chronic fatigue, rashes, hair loss, memory loss, lack of bowel control and even brain damage. Recently, disturbing reports of miscarriages, stillbirths, deaths, and birt defects among the babies conceived by the returning soldiers have also emerged. And now, evidence is mounting that the Desert Storm Syndrome may be contagious....It has been learned that the American soldiers were exposed to experimental vaccines, drugs, and pesticides'.(Supress) Ethics have become increasingly more important during recent years since they apply to the treatment of participants and since humans are more educated about their rights. All research exposes an individual to some degree of risk, even if this risk is minimal, that is, time spent away from activities during data collection or high risk - the possibility of adverse health effects while engaged in experimentally controlled physical exertion. ...read more.


Although APA( American Psychology Association) developed a Code of Ethics which applies for the use of animals in research, personally I strongly object to any use(APA Code of Ethics, 2002). In the "Ethics of Animal Investigation" a document published by the Canadian Council on Animal Care the regulations for animal use mention that animals must not be subjected to unnecessary pain or distress(Bailey). Weren't Pavlov's experiment and other similar behavioral experiments causing distress to the dog which had to learn to modify their behavior in order to receive food? Didn't the time that took the dog to learn this behavior cause distress since it could not receive food otherwise?(Myers,2000,p290-292) Similarly, in medical experiments simple or complex, usually rats are used. Isn't the intake of medication against obesity causing distress and health risk to the rats? Humans may consider animals a lower form of life, but this does not give us the right to act against another form of life. If we put ourselves in their position would we be happy to be the guinea pigs in a laboratory, been observed by a stranger or been administered various substances? Deprived the right of freedom even if we were born in captivity, the right of health and of privacy? ...read more.


We are animals too, and since we have feelings, obviously other animals have feelings too. Zoos are also a kind of entertainment, which I object. But zoos can change this theme of entertainment. They can actually help animals that are endangered to reproduce and increase the number of their species. For instance when I visited last summer the Chicago Aquarium, the scientists there were working on the reproduction of the Beluca whales (white dolphin like whales), which are an endangered species. They also had a dolphin "show" during which dolphins naturally swim and their swimming behavior is explained to the public (e.g. itching their back because the skin got dry = flying high and falling into the water with their back). Animal tests, in any form, and their use in entertainment are wrong. Animals feel the pain and they show it with their behavior by screaming, struggling, attacking. Animals are like humans and should be considered as individuals and not just members of a species. The most basic right of an individual is to be treated with respect. Therefore, as it is wrong to experiment on people without their consent, it is also wrong to experiment on animals. Unless codes of conduct and ethical guidelines continue to be abided by, all psychological (and indeed scientific) research could fall prey to becoming invalid and useless in today's society. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our University Degree Zoology section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related University Degree Zoology essays

  1. Should Animals Have the same Rights as us?

    These are in areas such as the slaughter of animals for food which nowadays is done by electrocution which is considered to be a near painless and quick death. Animals would also be subject to proper nourishment when in captivity and suitable shelter.

  2. Are there any circumstances in which it would be acceptale to use animals for ...

    But it should be noted again that the proper care during breeding as well as their use in research need to be an outstanding issue beside the freedom to breed animals and to use them

  1. This study attempts to explore the basis of people's fear of animals.

    Limitations of the research As a result of the fact that we were not too experienced in carrying out research, we acknowledge that the matter researched and the way the research was carried out, had a number of limitations, which if looked at properly, could have been avoided and improved on.

  2. Using the Grounded Theory to explore people's views on animal use: What factors influence ...

    so advanced in technology in that way, the DNA and cells and all that - surely they've got the technology that they don't have to do research on animals" (P11, 72-74). Animal testing is not the only form of animal use discussed throughout the interviews as various other forms such

  1. Animal Testing

    Animals are involved in testing the products such as cleaning products that assist humans less than medicines or surgery. (Animal Experiments) The major disadvantage of animal testing stated by John Frazier and Alan Goldberg of CAAT are "Animal discomfort and death, species-extrapolation problems and excessive time and expense."

  2. Antibiotic use in domestic animals - knock on effects to the environment IntroductionAntibiotics ...

    This theory states that those organisms adapted to the surrounding environment the best (both in feeding habits and body form, such as having thick fur in a cold place or being camouflaged correctly for a particular background)

  1. "Discuss the strengths and weaknesses of Ecologism as a new ethic."

    Regan argues that humans and some animals can similarly be regarded as -'subjects of a life', and that if this is the reason why we regard humans as morally considerable, it would be inconsistent to deny (some) animals similar consideration too.

  2. Why do we strive to achieve?

    Their research appears in the journal Science" (Weise 1). This is a huge advancement that may allow for endless advancements in human and animal medicine. Technologies such as growing stem cells are no longer a theory, but now seem to be a possible reality. Stem cells have the potential to save millions of lives every year.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work