The Study of Gender-Based Stereotypes and Their Potential Impact to the Organization

Authors Avatar

        MEN AND WOMEN OF THE CORPORATION

Running head: MEN AND WOMEN OF THE CORPORATION

Gender Roles: The Study of Gender-Based Stereotypes and Their Potential Impact to the Organization

Student ID: 2540 (AP202)

Southern Cross International College

(Path Education Singapore)


Gender Roles: The Study of Gender-Based Stereotypes and Their Potential Impact to the Organization

The study of gender in organizations constitutes a major development in the sociology of gender. And stereotypical perceptions and feminity are hardly new.  Throughout history, both men and women have been rewarded or penalized for adhering, or not adhering, to societal norms and models of appropriate communication behaviors for men and women. Now, as we venture into the twentieth century, rigid adherence to the communication behaviors dictated by gender-based stereotypes is not in our individual, dyadic, or collective best interest. Males and females now are working side by side in the marketplace, as more and more females are working outside the home.  The gender perspective provides for a modern critical analysis of organizational behaviors with non-trivial implications for optimum human resource development.  And this socioeconomic phenomenon of the twentieth century, suggests a need to develop greater understanding of gender-based stereotypes and their potential impact to the organization.

The two main approaches found in the gender studies in organizations are the structural and symbolic integrationist approaches.  In the structural approach, organizations are viewed as structures of dominance and power which transcend the deliberations of social actors (Reed, 1992).  In Reed’s view, feminists are pointed to the inequality inherent in these structures which re-created gender at the work place and called for radical measures to alter existing structures to alleviate the subordination of women.  Others sought to identify the sources of change within existing management frameworks that policy-makers could work on to address the issues for the optimal use of human resources.  For instance, Kanter’s (1977) pioneering study on women in a male-dominated organization examined how women’s mobility within the organization could be facilitated by policies which addressed their lack of negotiating power via structures of opportunity, power and numerical composition.  However Padavic (1991) reviewed that as the structural approach of Kanter mainly focuses the constrains imposed on organizational behavior, it is inadequate in explaining the social processes of change resulting from human agency given its deterministic orientation towards the person-organization relationship – because according to Kanter, often social change is a matter of changing the structural order without reference to the agency of individuals in influencing the interaction processes that accompany change. Thus, Padavic went on to propose the integrationist approach focusing on human agency in negotiating social change that construct between gender and organization identities at the work place and how equality is a negotiated reality between interacting participants.  For instance, Kanter noted the predominance of male managers in organizations led to the belief in the ‘masculine ethic’ where traits for effective management such as a tough-minded approach to problems; analytic abilities to abstract and plan, and a cognitive superiority in problem-solving and decision-making supposedly reside in men, gave rise to assumptions of the inherent inability of women to be good managers (Kanter, 1997 p. 22) – suggesting that men perceived female managers as less knowledgeable and possessing poorer managerial skills than men.  And further exploring Kanter’s approach, the conceptual categories of opportunity, power and tokenism, form the platform on which to situate discussions of the bargaining power women possess with which to negotiate gender and organizational identities.

Join now!

Opportunity structures refer to the steps up the career ladder in the organization. Those which provide upward career mobility generate related responses of increased work commitment, higher aspirations and involvement in the organization (Kanter, 1977 p. 135). Power refers to “the capacity to mobilize resources” (Kanter, 1977 p. 247). One can increase one’s power base through gaining support through the informal alliances with superiors and subordinates (Kanter, 1977 p. 247).  And in line with Kanter, Zimmer (1998) reviewed that the positions women occupy normally lack power given their predominance in jobs because of high levels of routinization, attributing the typical ...

This is a preview of the whole essay