y = 0.2540x
0.078 =0.2540x
Mass of starch with α-amylase = 0.31 mg
Mass of starch hydrolysed by α-amylase
= Mass of starch – Mass of starch with α-amylase
= 1.50–0.31
= 1.19mg
Mass of α-amylase used
It was shown that mass of protein in 0.3ml of α-amylase extract dialyzed in FC method
= 42.31µg, therefore the mass of protein can be determined for 1ml of the extract since 1ml of α-amylase was used.
The mass of protein in 1ml of α-amylase extract dialyzed =
= 141.03µg
Enzyme activity of α-amylase
Enzyme activity of α-amylase =
=
= 8.44x10-4mg of starch/min/µg of α-amylase
-
Purification of enzyme α-amylase using ion exchange chromatography
Table 4: The absorbance of standard BSA at 560nm and α-amylase after purification using CM column
Figure 4: The graph of absorbance at 560nm against the mass of protein, µg
Figure 5: The graph of mass of protein, µg against the test tubes for elution profile of CM
Calculations:
Mass of standard BSA
The concentration of standard BSA used = 500µg/ml
Volume of standard BSA used = 0.10ml
Mass of standard BSA = (concentration of standard BSA)(volume of standard BSA)
= (500)(0.10)
= 50µg
Mass of α-amylase in test tube 1
From figure 4, it can be shown that the relationship between the absorbance at 560nm and the mass of protein in solutions can be illustrated using the equation, y = 0.0029x where y is the absorbance and x is the mass of protein in solutions.
y = 0.0029x
0.011= 0.0029x
Mass of α-amylase = 3.79µg
This calculation was repeated for all the test tubes in order to determine the mass of α-amylase present. The results were tabulated in table 4.
Mass of α -amylase after 1st dialysis
Since out of the total 5ml of extract after 1st dialysis, only 3.7ml of it was used in the ion exchange chromatography,
Mass of α-amylase after 1st dialysis = x 3.7
= 521.83 µg
Mass of α-amylase after CM purification
As only 0.1ml out of the 1.0ml of the α-amylase sample was used to measure the mass of α-amylase for all the 10 tubes,
Mass of α-amylase after CM purification
= (3.79+3.10+4.83+4.48+8.28+4.83+5.86+4.14+5.17+5.17) ×
= 49.65x
= 496.50µg
Percentage of recovery
Percentage of recovery = x 100%
= 95.15%
Table 5: The absorbance of and mass of protein standard BSA at 560nm and α-amylase after purification using DEAE column
Figure 6: The graph of absorbance at 560nm against the mass of protein in solutions, µg
Figure 7: The graph of mass of protein, µg against the test tubes for the elution profile of DEAE
Calculations:
Mass of standard BSA
The concentration of standard BSA used = 500µg/ml
Volume of standard BSA used = 0.10ml
Mass of standard BSA = (concentration of standard BSA)(volume of standard BSA)
= (500)(0.10)
= 50µg
Mass of α-amylase in test tube 3
From figure 6, it can be shown that the relationship between the absorbance at 560nm and the mass of protein in solutions can be illustrated using the equation, y = 0.0146x where y is the absorbance and x is the mass of protein in solutions.
y = 0.0146x
0.021= 0.0146x
Mass of α-amylase = 1.44µg
This calculation was repeated for all the test tubes in order to determine the mass of α-amylase present. The results were tabulated in table 5.
Mass of total α-amylase used for second dialysis
Total mass of α-amylase = Ʃ(mass of α-amylase in test tubes 3,4,5,6 and 7)
= 1.44+1.92+2.47+2.33+2.05
= 10.21µg
Since only 0.1ml of the enzyme sample is out of 1.5ml put into each test tube, the actual total mass of α-amylase pulled for the second dialysis =
= 142.94µg
Mass of α -amylase used for DEAE purification
Since the 0.1ml out of 1.0ml of α-amylase was used for Folin Ciocalteau to determine the mass of α-amylase, the remaining 0.9ml of α-amylase in test tubes 5, 6, 7, 9 and 10 of CM were pulled for DEAE,
Mass of α-amylase used for DEAE =
= 263.79 µg
Mass of α-amylase after DEAE purification
As only 0.1ml out of the 1.5ml of the α-amylase sample was used to measure the mass of α-amylase for all the 10 tubes,
Mass of α-amylase after CM purification
= (0.55+0.27+1.44+1.92+2.47+2.33+2.05+1.16+1.03+0.41) ×
= 13.63x
= 204.45µg
Percentage of recovery
Percentage of recovery = x 100%
= 77.51%
-
Determination of Km and Vmax
Table 6: The enzymatic activity of ɑ-amylase from the absorbance and mass of starch at different concentrations
Calculations:
Initial concentration of 0.10% starch
The concentration of starch used = 0.10%
= 0.10g/100ml
= 100mg/100ml
= 1.00mg/ml
This calculation was repeated for all the starch solutions (0.10%, 0.15% and 0.30%) to obtain the concentration of starch. The results were tabulated in table 6.
Initial mass of 0.10% starch
The concentration of starch used = 1.00mg/ml
Volume of starch used = 1.00ml
Mass of starch = (concentration of starch)(volume of starch used)
= (1.00)(1.00)
= 1.00mg
This calculation was repeated for all the starch solutions (0.10%, 0.15% and 0.30%) to obtain the mass of starch. The results were tabulated in table 6.
Mass of starch remaining
From figure 3, it can be shown that the relationship between the absorbance at 620nm and the mass of protein in solutions can be illustrated using the equation, y = 0.2540x where y is the absorbance and x is the mass of starch in solutions.
y = 0.2540x
0.107 = 0.2540x
Mass = 0.42mg
Mass of starch hydrolysed by α-amlyase
Mass of starch hydrolysed in 0.10% of starch solution
= Initial mass of starch – Mass of starch remaining
= 1.00 – 0.42
= 0.58mg
This calculation was repeated for all the starch solutions (0.10%, 0.15% and 0.30%) to obtain the mass of starch hydrolysed by α-amylase so that enzymatic activity can be determined.
Concentration of α-amylase
Mass of α-amylase extracted from DEAE purification (values taken from week 3) = 142.94µg
Volume of α-amylase extract: 5 × 1.4 = 7.00ml
Concentration of α-amylase extracted =
=
= 20.42µg/ml
This calculation was repeated for all the starch solutions (0.10%, 0.15% and 0.30%) to obtain the concentration of α-amylase so that enzymatic activity can be determined.
Mass of α-amylase
Since the volume of α-amylase extract added to each of the solution = 0.20ml
Mass of ɑ-amylase extract used in assay = concentration x volume
= 20.42 x 0.2
= 4.084µg
This calculation was repeated for all the starch solutions (0.10%, 0.15% and 0.30%) to obtain the mass of α-amylase so that enzymatic activity can be determined.
Enzyme activity
Enzyme activity of α-amylase =
=
= 0.014mg of starch/min/µg of ɑ-amylase
This calculation was repeated for all the starch solutions (0.10%, 0.15% and 0.30%) to obtain the enzymatic activity of α-amylase. The results were tabulated in table 6.
Hanes-Woolf plot for determining of Km and Vmax
Table 7: The enzymatic activity in 1mg/ml of starch for different starch concentration
Figure 8: Hanes-Woolf plot of [S]/V, µg min ml-1 against the enzymatic activity [S], mg/ml
Calculation:
=
= 71.43 µg min ml-1
This calculation was repeated for 1.00mg/ml, 1.50mg/ml and 3.00mg/ml of starch solutions to obtain . The results were tabulated in table 7.
From figure 8, it can be shown that the relationship between the enzymatic activity of α-amylase and can be illustrated using the equation, y = 11.44x + 54.86 where y is and x is the concentration of starch, [S].
Vmax
= gradient of the graph
= 11.44
Vmax = 0.087mg of starch/min/µg of α-amylase
Km
= y axis intercept
= 54.86
= 54.86
Km = 4.795 mg/ml
-
Effects of pH on enzymatic activity of α-amylase
Table 8: The enzymatic activity of α-amylase from the absorbance and mass of starch at different pH buffers
Figure 9: The graph of enzymatic activity of α-amylase, mg/min/µg against the pH of buffers
Calculations:
Initial concentration of starch
The concentration of starch used = 0.15%
= 0.15g/100ml
= 150mg/100ml
= 1.50mg/ml
Initial mass of starch
The concentration of starch used = 1.50mg/ml
Volume of starch used = 1.00ml
Mass of starch = (concentration of starch)(volume of starch used)
= (1.50)(1.00)
= 1.50mg
This calculation was repeated for all the starch solutions with pH 5, 7, 9 and 12 to obtain the mass of starch. The results were tabulated in table 8.
Mass of starch remaining
From figure 3, it can be shown that the relationship between the absorbance at 620nm and the mass of protein in solutions can be illustrated using the equation, y = 0.2540x where y is the absorbance and x is the mass of starch in solutions.
y = 0.2540x**
0.184 = 0.2540 x
Mass of starch remaining in pH5 solution = 0.724mg
Mass of starch hydrolysed by α-amlyase
Mass of starch hydrolysed in pH5 starch solution
= Initial mass of starch – Mass of starch remaining
= 1.50 –0.724
= 0.776mg
This calculation was repeated for all the starch solutions with pH 5, 7, 9 and 12 to obtain the mass of starch hydrolysed by α-amylase so that enzymatic activity can be determined.
Concentration of α-amylase
Mass of α-amylase extracted from DEAE purification (values taken from week 3) = 142.94µg
Volume of α-amylase extract: 5 × 1.40 = 7.00ml
Concentration of α-amylase extracted =
=
= 20.42µg/ml
This calculation was repeated for all the starch solutions with pH 5, 7, 9 and 12 to obtain the concentration of α-amylase so that enzymatic activity can be determined.
Mass of α-amylase
Since the volume of α-amylase extract added to each of the solution = 0.20ml
Mass of ɑ-amylase extract used in assay = concentration x volume
= 20.42 x 0.2
= 4.084µg
This calculation was repeated for all the starch solutions with pH 5, 7, 9 and 12 to obtain the mass of α-amylase so that enzymatic activity can be determined.
Enzyme activity
Enzyme activity of α-amylase =
=
= 0.019 mg of starch/min/µg of α-amylase
This calculation was repeated for all the starch solutions with pH 5, 7, 9 and 12 to obtain the enzymatic activity of α-amylase. The results were tabulated in table 8.
- Effect of temperature on the enzymatic activity of α-amylase
Table 9: The enzymatic activity of α-amylase from the mass of starch and absorbance at 620nm at different temperature
Figure 10: The graph of enzymatic activity of α-amylase, mg/min/ µg against the temperature, °C
Calculations:
Initial concentration of starch
The concentration of starch used = 0.15%
= 0.15g/100ml
= 150mg/100ml
= 1.50mg/ml
Initial mass of starch
The concentration of starch used = 1.50mg/ml
Volume of starch used = 1.00ml
Mass of starch = (concentration of starch)(volume of starch used)
= (1.50)(1.00)
= 1.50mg
This calculation was repeated for all the starch solutions with temperature 4, 37, 50 and 70 to obtain the mass of starch. The results were tabulated in table 9.
Mass of starch remaining
From figure 3, it can be shown that the relationship between the absorbance at 620nm and the mass of protein in solutions can be illustrated using the equation, y = 0.2540x where y is the absorbance and x is the mass of starch in solutions.
y = 0.2540x**
0.189 = 0.2540 x
Mass of starch remaining solution at 4°C = 0.744mg
Mass of starch hydrolysed by α-amylase
Mass of starch hydrolysed in starch solution at 4°C
= Initial mass of starch – Mass of starch remaining
= 1.50 –0.744
= 0.756mg
This calculation was repeated for all the starch solutions with temperature 4, 37, 50 and 70 to obtain the mass of starch hydrolysed by α-amylase so that enzymatic activity can be determined.
Concentration of α-amylase
Mass of α-amylase extracted from DEAE purification (values taken from week 3) = 142.94µg
Volume of α-amylase extract: 5 × 1.40 = 7.00ml
Concentration of α-amylase extracted =
=
= 20.42µg/ml
This calculation was repeated for all the starch solutions with temperature 4, 37, 50 and 70 to obtain the concentration of α-amylase so that enzymatic activity can be determined.
Mass of α-amylase
Since the volume of α-amylase extract added to each of the solution = 0.20ml
Mass of ɑ-amylase extract used in assay = concentration x volume
= 20.42 x 0.2
= 4.084µg
This calculation was repeated for all the starch solutions with temperature 4, 37, 50 and 70 to obtain the mass of α-amylase so that enzymatic activity can be determined.
Enzyme activity
Enzyme activity of α-amylase =
=
= 0.019 mg of starch/min/µg of α-amylase
This calculation was repeated for all the starch solutions with temperature 4, 37, 50 and 70 to obtain the enzymatic activity of α-amylase. The results were tabulated in table 9.
-
Effects of ionic strength on enzymatic activity of α-amylase
Table 10: The enzymatic activity of α-amylase from the absorbance and mass of starch at different concentration of buffer
Figure 11: The graph of enzymatic activity of α-amylase, mg/min/µg against the concentration of buffer, M
Calculations:
Initial concentration of starch
The concentration of starch used = 0.15%
= 0.15g/100ml
= 150mg/100ml
= 1.50mg/ml
Initial mass of starch
The concentration of starch used = 1.50mg/ml
Volume of starch used = 1.00ml
Mass of starch = (concentration of starch)(volume of starch used)
= (1.50)(1.00)
= 1.50mg
This calculation was repeated for all the starch solutions with concentration of buffer 0.1M, 0.3M and 0.5M to obtain the mass of starch. The results were tabulated in table 10.
Mass of starch remaining
From figure 3, it can be shown that the relationship between the absorbance at 620nm and the mass of protein in solutions can be illustrated using the equation, y = 0.2540x where y is the absorbance and x is the mass of starch in solutions.
y = 0.2540x
0.159 = 0.2540 x
Mass of starch remaining in 0.1M of buffer solution = 0.626mg
Mass of starch hydrolysed by α-amylase
Mass of starch hydrolysed in 0.1M of buffer solution
= Initial mass of starch – Mass of starch remaining
= 1.50 –0.626
= 0.874mg
This calculation was repeated for all the starch solutions with concentration of buffer 0.1M, 0.3M and 0.5M to obtain the mass of starch hydrolysed by α-amylase so that enzymatic activity can be determined.
Concentration of α-amylase
Mass of α-amylase extracted from DEAE purification (values taken from week 3) = 142.94µg
Volume of α-amylase extract: 5 × 1.40 = 7.00ml
Concentration of α-amylase extracted =
=
= 20.42µg/ml
This calculation was repeated for all the starch solutions with concentration of buffer 0.1M, 0.3M and 0.5M to obtain the concentration of α-amylase so that enzymatic activity can be determined.
Mass of α-amylase
Since the volume of α-amylase extract added to each of the solution = 0.20ml
Mass of ɑ-amylase extract used in assay = concentration x volume
= 20.42 x 0.2
= 4.084µg
This calculation was repeated for all the starch solutions with concentration of buffer 0.1M, 0.3M and 0.5M to obtain the mass of α-amylase so that enzymatic activity can be determined.
Enzyme activity
Enzyme activity of α-amylase =
=
= 0.021 mg of starch/min/µg of α-amylase
This calculation was repeated for all the starch solutions with concentration of buffer 0.1M, 0.3M and 0.5M to obtain the enzymatic activity of α-amylase. The results were tabulated in table 10.
-
Effects of inhibitors on enzymatic activity of α-amylase
Table 11: The enzymatic activity of α-amylase from the absorbance and mass of starch with different inhibitors
Figure 12: The graph of enzymatic activity of α-amylase, mg/min/µg against the test tubes of inhibitors
Calculations:
Initial concentration of starch
The concentration of starch used = 0.15%
= 0.15g/100ml
= 150mg/100ml
= 1.50mg/ml
Initial mass of starch
The concentration of starch used = 1.50mg/ml
Volume of starch used = 1.00ml
Mass of starch = (concentration of starch)(volume of starch used)
= (1.50)(1.00)
= 1.50mg
This calculation was repeated for all the starch solutions with EDTA, urea and without inhibitors to obtain the mass of starch. The results were tabulated in table 11.
Mass of starch remaining
From figure 3, it can be shown that the relationship between the absorbance at 620nm and the mass of protein in solutions can be illustrated using the equation, y = 0.2540x where y is the absorbance and x is the mass of starch in solutions.
y = 0.2540x
0.308= 0.2540 x
Mass of starch remaining in 0.1M of buffer solution = 1.213mg
Mass of starch hydrolysed by α-amylase
Mass of starch hydrolysed in 0.1M of buffer solution
= Initial mass of starch – Mass of starch remaining
= 1.50 –1.213
= 0.287mg
This calculation was repeated for all the starch solutions with EDTA, urea and without inhibitors to obtain the mass of starch hydrolysed by α-amylase so that enzymatic activity can be determined.
Concentration of α-amylase
Mass of α-amylase extracted from DEAE purification (values taken from week 3) = 142.94µg
Volume of α-amylase extract: 5 × 1.40 = 7.00ml
Concentration of α-amylase extracted =
=
= 20.42µg/ml
This calculation was repeated for all the starch solutions with EDTA, urea and without inhibitors to obtain the concentration of α-amylase so that enzymatic activity can be determined.
Mass of α-amylase
Since the volume of α-amylase extract added to each of the solution = 0.20ml
Mass of ɑ-amylase extract used in assay = concentration x volume
= 20.42 x 0.2
= 4.084µg
This calculation was repeated for all the starch solutions with EDTA, urea and without inhibitors to obtain the mass of α-amylase so that enzymatic activity can be determined.
Enzyme activity
Enzyme activity of α-amylase =
=
= 0.007 mg of starch/min/µg of α-amylase
This calculation was repeated for all the starch solutions with EDTA, urea and without inhibitors to obtain the enzymatic activity of α-amylase. The results were tabulated in table 11.
Discussion:
Protein determination
In this experiment, the enzyme α-amylase was first extracted from the corn. The crude extract obtained was used for Folin-Ciocalteau (FC) method to determine the mass of protein in the crude extract. FC method was used for protein determination instead of the simpler biuret test because it was 100 times more sensitive with wider detection range and accurate than the biuret test since the colour blue developed was enhanced since copper ions will react with the protein to form peptide bonds and with the reduction of Folin phenol reagent by the residues of protein to blue molybdenum complex (Boyer, 2006).
The absorbance of protein was measured using the UV-vis spectrophotometer so that the mass of the protein can be calculated from the concentration as the concentration of the protein in crude extract is directly proportional to the absorbance values. The absorbance of standard BSA was also measured in order to calibrate a standard curve for the determination of protein mass. However, the mass of protein in the crude extract calculated from the FC method did not account only for the α-amylase enzyme. This is because there may be other enzymes present such as nitrate reductase, glutamate synthetase, lipoxydase and others (Campbell & Remmler, 1986). Also, there may be little amount of impurities which interfere the absorbance for protein. Therefore, the crude extract was required to undergo further purification using dialysis and ion exchange chromatography so that the results obtained will be more accurate as it will affect the enzymatic activity calculated.
The first dialysis was carried out to purify the enzyme and separate the impurities and other enzymes present in the crude extract. This was done using a dialysis tubing which is semi permeable and allows osmosis to be carried out through the membrane pores. Before this, the crude extract was added with ammonium sulphate and was centrifuged. Ammonium sulphate was used to precipitate the α-amylase out from the extract as it stabilized the protein (Schomburg & Schomburg, 2005). This procedure was carried out to discard and remove the contaminated protein through centrifuged, leaving the desired protein to be collected in the pellet (Campbell & Farrell, 2009). Dialysis also helps to remove ammonium uslphate so that results obtained will be more accurate since it interferes the further purifications.
Cutler (2004) stated that it is permeable to glucose which is small such as ammonium sulphate but not to starch or proteins because the molecules are too large to pass through the pores. The mass of protein obtained from the absorbance after dialysis was 705.17µg which was smaller than that of the crude extract which was 23160µg. This showed that some of the impurities and molecules had removed and the enzyme is remains in the tube. However, this salting out method was not as efficient as the ion exchange chromatography as the selectivity is low. This is because even though only small molecules diffused out from the tubing and large molecules such as starch and enzyme were trapped inside, there may be other enzymes present in the crude extract and other larger molecules which were not totally separated from α-amylase. Consequently, this affects the results as other enzymes and larger molecules will interfere the absorbance readings, causing the mass of α-amylase and its enzymatic activity calculated to be inaccurate.
Enzyme assay (α-amylase)
In order to determine whether the enzyme α-amylase extracted functions properly in hydrolyzing the starch to maltose, the enzyme assay was carried out. The starch solution without any enzyme was prepared and measured for its absorbance to act as a negative control since there will not be any starch being hydrolyzed to maltose. It was also used to calibrate a standard curve to determine the mass of enzyme. It was shown that the mass of starch solution alone without any enzymatic hydrolysis from the absorbance detected by the spectrophotometer was higher than that of the starch solution with the α-amylase enzyme. This indicated that some of the starch was hydrolyzed by α-amylase since the absorbance measured by the spectrophotometer was the starch remaining in the test tube. The enzymatic activity of the α-amylase can be calculated which was 8.44x10-4mg of starch/min/µg of α-amylase.
Purification of enzyme α-amylase using ion exchange chromatography
Since the enzyme extract was only purified using the centrifuge and salting out method with the dialysis tubing, further purification was needed in order to separate other enzymes and larger molecules that may be present. This was done using the ion exchange chromatography with CM and DEAE column. It separates α-amylase from the rest of the solution based on the charged of the enzyme and the stationary phase consisting cationic or anionic resins. According to Warner et al. (1991), the isoelectric point for α-amylase is 5.70 to 4.06. Since the protein was put in buffer of pH 7 which was higher than the isoelectriv point, the protein will have negative net charge (Boyer, 2006).
For Carboxymethyl (CM) column, it contained cation exchanger while diethylaminoethyl (DEAE) contained anion exchanger (Boyer, 2006). Since α-amylase has a negative net charge, when the enzyme extract was run with CM column, it will not adsorb to the cation exchanger and hence will be eluted out to be collected while other enzymes or macromolecules present in the extract which were positively charged will have higher affinity to the cation exchanger and remained in the column. The eluted protein was then run with DEAE to further purify the enzyme. The negatively charged enzyme will now adsorb to the anion exchanger in DEAE column. NaCl was then used to release the bounded enzyme since it has a higher ionic strength. The collected enzyme from CM and DEAE column was determined with FC method.
From the elution profile of CM and DEAE column, it can be seen that protein in test tube 5 was in highest amount while the protein in test tube 1, 2, 8, 9, and 10 were lesser. This may due to the reason that the enzyme was moving very slowly in the column wiht resin and only little amount of enzyme was eluted out at the beginning anbd little amount of enzyme was left for the last few test tubes. For the uneven bell-shaped of the CM graph, it may due to the uneven distribution of phosphate buffer in the column.
It was shown that the mass of enzyme α-amylase collected from CM column was 496.50µg which was lower than that before the purification and higher than that of DEAE column which was 204.45µg. This showed that some of the macromolecules and other enzyme were removed through CM and DEAE purification. It was also shown that the precentage of recovery for CM column which was 95.15% was higher than that of DEAE column which was only 77.51%. This indicated that CM purification was more efficient than the DEAE purification since higher amount of protein remained after running through the CM column.
Determination of Km and Vmax
One of the factors that will affect the enzymatic activity of α-amylase is the substrate concentration. It was shown that the enzymatic activity of α-amylase increased with increasing starch concentration. As stated by Taylor et al. (1997), when the concentration of substrate increased, the enzymatic activity also increased until it reached the optimum concentration. After the optimum level, further increase in substrate concentration will not change the enzymatic activity as all the enzymes were bounded to the substrates and no free enzymes were available (Campbell & Reece, 2008). The effect of substrate concentration on the enzymatic activity can be determined from Km and Vmax. Km is the concentration of substrate at half of the Vmax while Vmax is the maximum enzymatic activity. It was found that the Vmax of this experiment was 0.087mg of starch/min/µg of α-amylase which was higher than that of 3.0 mg/ml of starch concentration. This indicated that 3.0mg/ml of starch in the solution was not saturated for the enzyme yet and the optimum level of starch concentration haven be reached. Also, from the Km value which was 4.795 mg/ml, it can be seen that the concentration of starch required for the enzyme to have maximum enzymatic activity was much higher. This indicated that the α-amylase can hydrolyze large amount of starch.
To calculate the Km and Vmax, Hanes-Woolf plot was used instead of Lineweaver-Burk double reciprocal plot and Hofstee-Eadie plot. This was because Lineweaver-Burk double reciprocal plot involved the reciprocal of both enzymatic activity and starch concentration. This will magnify the errors, giving inaccurate and unreliable results of calculating the Km and Vmax as there may be errors in calculating the enzymatic acitivity from the mass of protein in the extract due to the possibility of presence of other interference.Also, Hofstee-Eadie plot involved enzymatic activity for both axis which will lower the accuracy of results as the errors in calculating enzymatic activity are magnified. Hence, Hanes-Woolf plot was more prefered
Effect of pH on enzymatic activity of α-amylase
The results showed that the enzymatic activity of α-amylase was the highest in solution of pH 7 which was 0.022mg of starch/min/µg of α-amylase. This showed that pH 7 is the optimum pH for the enzyme to hydrolyze starch normally. When the pH was lower or higher than pH 7 which were pH 5, 9 and 12, the enzymatic activity decreased. This was because when pH is low, the concentration of hydrogen will increase causing the solution to be acidic. Consequently, the ionic state of side chains of the amino acid will be altered, leads to the denature of the enzyme and thus lower the enzymatic activity. When the pH is higher than the optimum pH, the concentration of hydrogen will decrease and hydroxyl ions will increase. The hydroxyl ions will compete against the enzymes' ligands for divalent and trivalent cations to form hydroxides (Pandey et al., 2006). This causes the enzyme to lose proton and hance changes its shape and has lower enzymatic activity.
Effect of temperature on the enzymatic activity of α-amylase
It was shown that at temperature 4°C, the enzymatic activity of α-amylase was low which was 0.019mg of starch/min/µg of α-amylase. This was because at low temperature, there was not sufficient energy for collision to be carry out between the enzyme and the starch. As a result, little amount of starch bind to the active of enzyme to be broken down. The transition state of the enzme-substrate complex was also freeze due to low temperature (Pandey et al., 2006). When the temperature increased, the enzymatic activity also increased. This was shown at 37°C where the enzymatic activity was 0.024mg of starch/min/µg of α-amylase. This was because increase temperature will increase the kinetic energy of the molecules, causing more collision between the enzyme and starch.
However at higher temperature, it was shown that the enzymatic activity for α-amylase was also low. At 50°C and 70°C, the enzymatic activity was 0.016mg of starch/min/µg of α-amylase and 0.007mg of starch/min/µg of α-amylase respectively. As stated by Taylor et al. (1997), high temperature will denature the enzyme by unfolding the 3 dimensional structure due to the breakage of hydrogen bonds and hydrophobic interaction which are sensitive to temperature change. Thus, the optimum temperature for α-amylase to function normally was 37°C (Hsieh et al, 2008).
Effect of ionic strength on enzymatic activity of α-amylase
In order to investigate the effect of ionic strength on enzymatic activity of α-amylase, the concentration of buffer solution used was manipulated as higher concentration of buffer has higher ionic strength since the amount of ions present in the solution is higher. In this experiment, it was shown that α-amylase has a highest enzymatic activity in 0.5M of buffer solution which was 0.032mg of starch/min/µg of α-amylase while the lowest in 0.1M which was 0.021mg of starch/min/µg of α-amylase. This indicated that when the ionic strength increases, the enzymatic activity also increases.
At lower ionic strength solution, the ions in the enzyme will interact with each other, causing the enzyme to be denatured. Hence the enzymatic activity was low (Pandey et al., 2006). Scopes (2002) claimed that increasing ionic strength will lower the enzymatic activity since the ionic bond form between the enzyme and substrates at the active site was disrupted. However, this was not the case in this experiment since different types of enzyme have different optimum ionic strength for it to function optimally. Also, this may due to the reason that the concentration of buffer which was 0.5M was not high enough to disrupt the ionic bond at the active site.
Effect of inhibitors on enzymatic activity of α-amylase
In this experiment, it was shown that the enzymatic activity in solution without any inhibitors was the highest which was 0.018mg of starch/min/µg of α-amylase. This was because the enzyme was not restricted to carry out its function normally to hydrolyze the starch to maltose. However, when inhibitors were added, the enzymatic activity decreased. According to Hsieh et al. (2008), EDTA inhibits completely on α-amylase while urea only inhibit α-amylase partially. This was because since calcium ions are present in the enzyme, EDTA which is a strong chelating agent will diminish the enzymatic activity by forming complex molecules with the ions (Satyanarayana & Johri, 2005). Thus, the enzyme loss its ability to hydrolyze the starch and can be considered as denatured since EDTA is a non-competitive inhibitors. It can be seen that the enzymatic activity.
On the other hand, urea will inhibit enzyme by replacing the enzyme to form hydrogen bonds with the substrate as it attached to the carboxyl group of amino acids of the enzyme (Choudhary, 1996). This causes the enzyme to be not able to bind with starch as the active site which is moulded by amino acid. Thus the enzymatic activity of α-amylase in the presence of urea should be higher than that of EDTA since urea is a competitive inhibitor. However, the results showed that the enzymatic activity in the presence of urea is lower than that of the EDTA. This may due to the reason that the concentration of urea added was 8M which was higher as compared to that of EDTA which was only 3mM.
As shown by the results, α-amylase can carry out its function to break down starch at pH 7, temperature of 37°C, 0.5M of buffer and without any inhibitors since the enzymatic activity with these conditions were high. This was because the enzyme is not denatured at this point y extreme condition such as low or high pH, temperature and ionic strength.
Conclusion:
In conclusion, α-amylase has a maximum enzymatic activity (Vmax) of 0.087 mg of starch /min/μg of α-amylase and the concentration of starch needed for α-amylase to reach half of the maximum enzymatic activity (Km) was 4.79mg/ml. The optimum conditions for the enzyme to have optimum enzymatic activity were pH 7, temperature of 37°C, 0.5M of buffer and without any inhibitors since the enzymatic activities with these conditions were high which were 0.022, 0.024, 0.032, 0.018 mg of starch /min/μg of α-amylase respectively.
References:
Arora, DK & Bhatnagar, D (2005), Handbook of fungal biotechnology, Marcel Dekker Inc, USA, p. 500.
Boyer, R (2006), Biochemistry laboratory, Pearson Education, Inc., United States of America, p.70.
Campbell, MK & Farrell, SO (2009), Biochemistry, 7th ed., Brooks/Cole Cengage Learning, Canada, p.118.
Campbell, NA & Reece, JB (2008), ‘An introduction to metabolism’, in Biology, 8th ed., Pearson Education Inc, San Francisco, pp. 151-159.
Campbell, WH & Remmler, JL (1986), ‘Regulation of Corn Leaf Nitrate Reductase: I. Immunochemical Methods for Analysis of the Enzyme's Protein Component’, Plant Physiology, Vol. 80, No., pp. 435-441, viewed 15th, October, 2011, <>.
Choudhary, MI (1996). Biological Inhibitors, Overseas Publishers Association, Netherlands, p.199.
Copeland, RA (2000), Enzymes: a practical introduction to structure, mechanism, and data analysis, John Wiley and Sons, New York.
Cutler, P (2004), Protein Purification protocols, 2nd ed., Humana Press, New Jersey, p. 299.
Hsieh, MS, Yin, LJ & Jiang, ST (2008), ‘Purification and characterization of amylase from a small abalone Haliotis sieboldii’, Fisheries Science, vol. 74, no. 2, pp. 425-432, viewed 16th October, 2011, < >
Pandey, A, Webb, C, Soccol, CR & Larroche, C (2006), Enzyme technology, Springer, Berlin.
Satyanarayana, T & Johri, BN (2005), Microbial diversity: current perspectives and potential applications, I.K International Publishiung House, New Delhi, p. 746.
Schomburg, D & Schomburg, I (2005), Springer Handbook of Enzymes: Class 1, Oxidoreductases VII; EC1.4, 2nd ed., Springer Berlin Heidelberg, New York, p.153.
Scopes, RK (2002), Enzyme Activity and Assays, Encyclopedia of Life sciences, Macmillan Publishers Ltd, New York.
Taylor, DJ, Green, NPO & Stout, GW (1997), ‘Enzymes’, in Biological science 1&2, 3rd ed., Cambridge University Press, United Kingdom, pp. 116-126.
Warner, DA, Grove, MJ & Knutson, CA (1991), ‘Isolation and charaterization of alpha-amylases from endosperm of germinating maize’, Cereal Chemistry, vol. 68, no. 4, pp. 383-390, viewed 16th October, 2011, <>