What does this table tell us about the identities of people visiting Englands National Parks

Authors Avatar

B6429266

Sarah Jayne Makinson TMA03

Part One
What does this table tell us about the identities of people visiting England’s National Parks?

The table (Natural England leisure visits data 2005, cited in Open University, 2011, p. 22-23) shows data collected about the people visiting the National Parks in England. This data devises a numerical summary and provides possible suggestions as to the characteristics and descriptions of these people.

‘Car-owning household’ gives a notable statistic. Of all adults asked, 75% own a car within their household and 87% of these are National Park visitors which is a large amount. On the other hand, the 25% of the adults that do not own a car show a percentage of just 13 visiting the National Parks. This statistic could indicate that access to a vehicle is an important factor for those who may or may not visit these National Parks.

Looking at sub-heading ‘Ethnicity’ it is clear to see that adults from a white population are more prominent National Park trip takers. There is a great difference in percentages of White and Non-White people visiting the parks with 96% being white and a mere 2% being Non-White.  The Non-White category holds 2% of visitors not only to the National Parks but that of all rural trip takers. This suggests that the Non-White people are of marked identity as they are not as included within the National Parks and with this Othering occurs.

Another category that provides a large difference in data is that under the category of ‘Disability’. From all adults asked 17% claimed to have a disability. Out of this 17% only 9% stated to be a National Park trip taker. These people appear to be of collective identity as they seem excluded from the parks. The 89% of adults asked that don’t have a disability provide the 83% that visit England’s National Parks therefore creating unmarked identities.

The age of adults visiting the park is predominately  45+ (57%). The percentage is also higher (a difference of 11 percentage points) for 45+ in the all rural trip takers category. However when looking at the category of ‘all trip takers’, it states 52% of this category are under the age of 45. This could suggest that those under 45 perhaps visit subsidiary destinations over National Parks.

Join now!

The percentage of wealthy achievers visiting the National Parks (31%) is higher than any other ACORN classification provided. Only 4% of the adults asked with urban prosperity visit the national park which perhaps suggests they don’t visit the rural countryside and is possible they may be excluded from these locations.

In the category ‘children in household’ it shows 28% of adults asked that have children, just 26% visit the National Parks. This is a small percentage compared to those visiting that don’t have children (74%) suggesting that adults with no children are more likely to visit the National Parks.

In ...

This is a preview of the whole essay