What is the evidence that aggression and violence are biologically determined?

Authors Avatar

Biobaces Essay Semester 2 [PS]

What is the evidence that aggression and violence are biologically determined?

Tebartz van Elst, Woermann, Leemiex, Thompsam, and Trimble (2000) suggest aggressive and violent or antisocial behaviours are ‘phenomenological and probably neurobiological heterogeneous’.  Substantial research emphasizes two types of aggression; predatory (PA) and defensive (DA) (Vitiello and Stoff, 1997;cited in Tebatz van Elst, et al., 2000).  In addition, premeditated aggression, impulsive aggression, or violence due to illness, e.g. Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder, have also been identified (Bradshaw and Mattingley, 1995).  Furthermore, exhibited aggression/violence may be defined as physical or psychological (Smythies, 1970).  Subsequently, their triggers may be conscious or unconscious and may be attributed to environmental/social factors, temperament, gender differences, genetic factors, and neurological determinants [including various brain structures and neurotransmitters] (Baron and Richardson, 1994; Wood, Wong and Chacherer, 1991; cited in Lau and Pihl, 1995;).  Both excitatory and inhibitory (Carlson, 1998) brain structures are believed to mediate antisocial behaviours including; the temporal lobes, parts of the Limbic System (LS), Amygdala (AD), Periaqueductal Grey Matter (PAG), Hypothalamus (HT) and septal area), and the Orbitofrontal Cortex (OFC)  (Marzuk, 1996).  Furthermore, several excitatory and inhibitory neurotransmitters are implicated including; Serotonin (5-HT), dopamine and Norepinephrine (NE).  Similarly, hormones have been suggested to play a role (Marzuk, 1996).  In addition, genetic links have been suggested for Impulsive violence/Aggression (IA) (Brunner, Nelen, Breakefield and Ropers van Oost, 1993) with mutation of the monoamine oxidise A (MAO A) gene.  This essay will principally concentrate on neurological influences, briefly outlining social, genetic, and hormonal contributors to aggression and violence.  The essay will conclude by summarising, the illustrated factors believed to be involved in the mediation of aggression and violence, lastly, it will propose that a larger interconnective approach between biological determinants could be explored.  However, it will firstly examine PA and IA in further detail.

PA is involved mainly in animal survival (Pinel, 1999).  The author suggests such behaviour may be predetermined in man and be exhibited as a response to situations which were once a necessity for continued existence.  Conversely, the primary objective of intentional aggression is to inflict harm and is more premeditated than PA (Smythies, 1970).  IA may result from the release of feelings and frustration (Smythies, 1970) however; this is unlike opportunistic, premeditated (intentional) aggression, where an individual may profit from their behaviour (psychologically or materially) (Bradshaw and Mattingley, 1995).  Thus, the difference between the degrees to which an aggressive act is consciously controlled may be divided into intentional aggression and unplanned aggression where the consequences have not been considered by the perpetrator (Smythies, 1970).

Environmental and social contributors to aggressive and violent behaviour have been suggested to start in the home (Smythies, 1970).  Early findings suggest high correlations between antisocial behaviour and low socio-economic class (cited in Peters and McMahon, 1992).  Furthermore, conformity to social norms has been associated with such behaviours (Hogg and Vaughan, 1998).  However, these social considerations only describe triggers and emancipators; they do not identify how the response is derived.  Antisocial behaviour derivatives are suggested therefore to stem from biochemical abnormalities and temperament (Peters and McMahon, 1993).

Male social aggression has been associated with hormonal levels (Nelson, 1995; Cited in Rosenzweig, Leimen, and Breedlove, 1996), namely testosterone.  Ehrenkranz (1974) suggested a positive correlation between testosterone levels and social hostility (cited in Rosenzweig et al., 1996).  Lloyd, (1971) similarly found androgen levels reduced after losing an aggressive encounter (cited in Rosenzweig et al., 1996).  However, the causality is questionable as early studies on rats (Beeman, 1947; cited in Carlson, 1998) suggest increases in testosterone promote PA.  Nethertheless, Albert, Walsh, and Jonik, (1993) indicated that social and DA are different, (cited in Pinel, 1999).  The author suggests this may clarify the differences in causality between Beeman’s and Ehrenkanz’s findings.  However, as these studies are correlational they do not imply causality.  Additionally, hormones have been implicated in increased aggression in women, Floody (1983) reported that pre-menstrual women might show heightened levels of aggression.  However, this has been contested, as individuals cope differently with the monthly changes (Carlson, 1998).  

Join now!

Gene encoding is important to consider as Chen, Rainnie, Greene, and Tonegawa (1994) found abnormalities in some psychiatric patients’ genes heightens aggressiveness.  However, though this suggests that genes are causal in the role of antisocial behaviour it is not believed to be entirely so, as there is a low concordance rate between monozygote twins (Atren and Curthoys, 1996).  In addition, Monoamine Oxidisase genes (MAO) are important to consider as they are principal enzymes for eliminating all monoamine neurotransmitters, including, NE, epinephrine, dopamine and 5-HT (Maes and Coccaro, 1998).  Brunner et al., (1993) found that in some individuals a deficiency ...

This is a preview of the whole essay