Cross cultural management. For Riordan to become a successful global company, it needs to look at other businesses and benchmark how these companies manage cultural differences. Riordan can implement several programs to respond to this type of challenge f

Authors Avatar

Cross-Cultural Management: Riordan

         Cross-cultural management is important to all companies. It is especially important for companies that want to become global. Throughout this paper, the authors will discuss several examples of how companies apply cross-cultural management principles and how other countries deal with similar cultural differences. The companies discussed in this paper are DHL, UPS, Starbucks, 3M, Trinity Industries, Community Development and Management Association of Africa (CDMAA), Pepsi Co, and CISCO.(所用例子)

        This paper will focus on different areas concerning culture. These key concepts include cultural differences, organizational culture, Cross-Border External Environment and Cultural Synergies, and International Management(key areas)

Key Course Concepts

        For Riordan to become a successful global company, it needs to look at other businesses and benchmark how these companies manage cultural differences. Riordan can implement several programs to respond to this type of challenge for the company. Receiving input from its employees is critical for Riordan. This input can make a huge difference on how they should do these things and it can help the company meet the needs of their employees.

        Cultural differences are what distinguishe societies from one another. Many companies go global and cultural differences are very important, especially as it pertains to communication. In addition to effective communication hinging on understanding internal cultural differences, organizational culture is another cross-cultural management principal that can assist Riordan as it seeks to expand globally.

        Riordan wants to create a work environment in which different cultures can work together respectfully and efficiently. Riordan can benchmark the success of the organizational culture of 3M and Starbucks to help Riordan create a diversity work environment. Organizational culture can be defined in various ways. “Organizational culture is the shared beliefs that enable members to understand their roles and the norms of organization” (Hodgetts, Luthans, & Doh, 2005, p. 154). An international company has to cultivate an organizational culture that can bridge business operations across several countries and diverse cultures.

      Riordan faces many challenges regarding cross-border external environments and developing cultural synergies. Each employee places a value on the traditions and memories of his country of origin that Riordan must consider. One of the authors, Walters, observed firsthand how an organization works toward employee advancement. Trinity Industries provides a management team that understands the practices of the various cultures and works with individuals to achieve a progressive work environment. Recommendations come from the management teams to promote interactive activities that mix the various cultures and encourages dialog. This dialogue results in personal interactions that become a bond between individuals. After forming the bonds, the employees coalesce as a cohesive unit that achieves or even exceeds positional expectations. Developing this cultural synergy is a key management concept, and one that applies to companies operating internationally.

      If Robert Lord, Director of Operations in China, fails to apply sound international management principles and cannot integrate the diverse cultures of Koreans, Pakistanis, Chinese, and Indians into an efficient workforce, the new facility will not meet production goals. He can benchmark the global HR integration successes of CISCO and PepsiCo to help him solve this problem. “International management is the process of applying management concepts and techniques in a multinational environment and adapting management practices to different economic, political, and cultural environments” (Hodgetts et al., 2005, p. 6). Both CISCO and PepsiCo operate globally, both create a concerted effort to ensure multicultural inclusion, and both create successful work environments.

The Compared and Contrasted Practices of Each Company

        DHL and UPS are very similar companies. Not only are they very similar for what they do, but they are also two major global companies. Both companies have implemented two different types of programs and these programs have had their challenges, but they have been very successful for these companies over the years. DHL has employees throughout the world so keeping its managers trained concerning culture is very important. Its managers will be those who deal with these people on a day-to-day basis no matter what country in which they live.

        UPS is very similar to DHL, and it has a similar program within its company, but UPS focuses on more input from their employees. UPS advocates that the employees need to be a part of this program and that their input is very important.

        Starbucks and 3M are companies that devote significant resources to creating a work environment that value and respect people from diverse backgrounds, respect their customs and beliefs, and allow its employees to do their best work. Starbucks’ diversity approach focuses on partners, customers, suppliers, and communities. Starbucks respects its employees’ talents, experiences, and outlook, and this approach makes Starbucks success possible (Starbucks, 2010).

      3M also values diversity in the workforce, in the global market, and in the communities in which it serves. 3M created a culture that encourages employee satisfaction and well-being, promotes integrity, and supports social and environmental responsibility (3M, 2010).

Join now!

        The benchmarked companies of Trinity Industries and CDMAA provide avenues of success regarding cultural differences in organizational culture, cross-border external environment, cultural synergies, and international management. Regarding cultural differences, Trinity Industries and CDMAA respect many cultures within its workforce and attempt to adapt to cultural differences. Organizational culture is promoted at Trinity Industries and CDMAA as geocentric organizations that observe and react to the global and regional cultures of the individual. Cross-border external environments provide challenges to Trinity Industries because many plants are near the borders of other countries, resulting in applicants from many diverse backgrounds. The CDMAA, on the other ...

This is a preview of the whole essay