• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

In this essay I will discuss whether the modern market economies are really driven by the corporate power or the sovereign power of consumers, and relate it to J.K. Galbraiths analysis of the large corporation. I will also assess the arguments for and

Extracts from this document...


In this essay I will discuss whether the modern market economies are really driven by the corporate power or the sovereign power of consumers, and relate it to J.K. Galbraith's analysis of the large corporation. I will also assess the arguments for and against Galbraith about the Transitional National Corporation. The Market economy is a system that relies on the market forces which are carried out by the consumers and companies, such as the TNC (Transitional National Corporation) and the MNC (Multinational National Corporation); which have increased significantly in the past fourty to fifty years. They are very important in the economies of many countries throughout the world, as they dominate the economy of their business environment. There are different opinions among economists; concerning the prospect of who controls the market economy. Some economists argue that in the capitalist market overall, consumers control the market system; whereas others say it is the corporate powers that dominate the markets economy. However; according to The New Industrial State, written by J K. Galbraith in 1967, there is an argument that the market capital has two systems. The market system, for the small firms and the Planning system for the larger firms Galbraith stated that Market systems are made up of many small firms; which are disciplined by the market as they have no control over their prices, and they are affected by the market forces. ...read more.


The government only intervenes when necessary, for example, their intervention comes when mostly when the market fails. There are certain things that planning system can not plan or regulate by it self; therefore the Government will have the responsibility to complete the overall planning system. The big firms cannot control the overall size of the economy, thus, the Government regulates and aggregates demand. Also, the government provides security and manages the total spending to stabilize the economy, so that they can stop rising the entire price constantly. Large corporations cannot regulate inflation, the government does it independently somehow. Large firms cannot provide skilled workers they need, they cannot educate them, but they can provide training. So the Government provides the education that workers require, through funding colleges and universities. The Government also bails out some large corporations when they fail by giving them required funding to remain in the market. For instance, Banks who supply loans to small business. If the government does not bail out Banks, then there will be massive job losses and small business will burst since they depend on Banks in the current recession. However, if the large firms made abnormal profits, it will lead to economic growth of the Government. "Government intervention may be able to rectify various failing of the market. Government intervention in the market can be used to achieve various economics objectives which may not be best achieved by the market. ...read more.


In conclusion, I agree that the corporate powers are those who really drive the markets economy, in relation to J.K. Galbraith's analysis of the large corporations. Galbraith clearly emphasises his view on the Transitional National Corporation; which enables us to reach a conclusion, although many economists disagree with his opinions. The banks influence business decisions of small firms, whilst planning systems are in command of their costs. Some economists believe consumers drive the market economy; which I do not agree with because deep planning is required for a corporation to be able to succeed in the long-term. Big corporations have the facilities to provide global television advertisements and consumers were being persuaded to purchase goods through these means. There are certain things disadvantages in planning systems though, because they cannot provide skilled workers that they need, so the Government funds educational organisations to provide training. Nevertheless, TNC's control a quarter of production assets which is why Galbraith believed it was not the consumers but the Planning system which drove the market economy; and that shareholders do not have a great deal of control over larger firms. Other economists such as Hayek disagreed; they stated that the largest firms will fail, given that they do not rectify what customers want. I agree to this statement to an extent, but feel that the planning system and the larger firms have the foremost control, and success and failure is in their hands. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our University Degree Microeconomics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related University Degree Microeconomics essays

  1. Process control at Polaroid.

    The means of sample weights for the Pods are always within the control limits in the given time interval. This indicates that the process in under control. The range chart also gives evidence of the process being under control but this fact is not supported by the defects found in the pods by the auditors.

  2. Free essay

    Analysis of market structure in the airline industry.

    Source: Bized.co.uk The diagram above illustrates that British Airways (BA) is producing at (P1,Q1). However, if BA decides to increase ticket prices above P1, other airlines in the market like KLM-Air France will not follow because they will be able to gain an advantage through the prospect of selling more

  1. Briefly outline some of the main models of oligopoly in which firms compete according ...

    In the below graph, D' represents firm A's residual demand curve (i.e Total Demand D minus the output firm B will produce as summarized by firm B's best response curve). For example, if firm A sets Qa= 0, firm B's best response would be Qb=30, it can be seen that

  2. Monopoly. A monopoly may arise as a result of natural forces, or it ...

    With positive selling expenditures, which are, of course, part of the firm's costs, the average (total) cost curve can be disaggregated into average production costs and average selling costs. With a given level of selling expenditures, the average selling cost curve (ASC)

  1. How will a firms pricing strategy depend on the structure of the market?

    As the price level is set at market level, perfect knowledge is therefore apparent. Both these characteristics combine to create a law of one price, "In a perfectly competitive industry the occurrence of all transactions between buyers at a single, common market price4".

  2. Vietnam economy 2003 - 2009

    However, there used to be inflation in 2004. Although it dropped slightly in the next few years, the inflation surged up in 2008 again and created many problems to Vietnam's economy and its civilians also. After Doi Moi campaign has launched, the economy of Vietnam developed enormously. The standard of living was higher and the GDP growth increased dramatically.

  1. Business Plan

    The products are brand named and imported from the USA and Japan with the purpose of provide high-quality products that meet the high demand of mothers who live in big cities and lack of time going shopping. Since its establishment, with its informative and attractive website, Baby Zone Jsc.

  2. Modigliani, along with his co-worker, Merton Miller, proposed a theorem concerning corporate economics, called ...

    no transaction costs exist, and individuals and corporations borrow at the same rate. This proposition should be true, for example, if an investor was considering buying either firm L or U. Rather than purchasing the shares of levered firm L, the investor could purchase the shares of firm U and borrow the same amount of money that firm L does.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work