Every blocks focus on their own points in this model. The financial department concentrates on financial activities. The human resources department is in charge of the hiring, training, and firing operations. The R&D function creates new products or ideas. Manufacturing focuses on producing finished product. The sales team takes the role of promoting the finished product in the market.
- Strengths of functional structure
As the most widely used organizational structure, the functional structure has four obvious advantages than the other structures. According to (2011), the main strengths of functional structure are clear responsibility, departmental coordination, knowledge sharing and easy to supervise.
-
Clear responsibility: the constructing along the functions will provides clear working division between different departments. Since the employees all have different places they can play different roles in an organization. As a result it is easy to find out what they should do or what they should not do. The organization will operate more efficiently and the targets can be managed easily and achieved effectually.
-
Departmental coordination: functional structure can bring responsible objective to organization and make different departments can get better cohesion. It can create a win-win situation in team work of the organization and it can reduce the contradictions of different departments.
-
Knowledge sharing: the employees who are working together are in same field in this structure. So that they can share the knowledge which are different from their own with other employees. For example, an accountant can exchange the knowledge with other accountant and support each others. It is the simplest way to familiar with the product line and therefore is best suited for cultivating general managers in an organization.
-
Easy to supervise: in functional structures the directors are usually the specialists in their field and they usually have a really high performance. These leaders should have the superior technical level of management and a broad range of working experiences which can make the whole management process easier. As a result employees can be better motivated, distributed, rewarded and punished.
- Weaknesses of functional structure
Although this kind of organizational structure has a lot of benefits it still needs some improvement. Kushnuma (2007) summarized the weaknesses of functional structure as the following five points: duplication of resources, inhibits career growth of specialists, divisional affiliations, difficult product integration and slow response.
-
Duplication of resources: in order to separate the various departments and make them can work independent. Some of the resources which should be shared may have been reduplicated. Such as the technical experts in specific fields could not be shared across the separate departments.
-
Inhibits career growth of specialists: although the managers could be well-trained in fundamental structure, the technical experts could feel bad in this context. For instance, when technical personnel from technology department work with other department, they may feel alienated from peers. In addition they have poor exposure development to the developments across the organizations.
-
Divisional affiliations: employees can clearly feel perception of affiliation in their own department but they lack the awareness of the whole organization. They may know their purpose yet may not understand how they can achieve organization’s targets.
-
Difficult product integration: The organization which has various production lines could use different parts to make larger products may have a very difficult integration task. The challenging is caused by lacking coordinate divisions. Every department manager will pay more attention to his product and ignore the problem of integration, because it is not his job.
-
Slow response: functional structure can not adapt to a new environment rapidly when the changes coming. The authorities of decision-making are totally controlled by top managers. As a result, it need more time to communicate, authorize and finally improve the organization from the changes.
- Application of functional structure
The functional structure can become the most efficient structure when the organization has fulfilled the following two conditions. Firstly, it should be a small or medium size organization which provides few kinds of productions. The large-scale organizations which have various products would have really complex daily operating if they use this structure. Secondly, the external environment of the company must remain stable because functional structure is difficult to change in a short time.
Conclusion
In conclusion, the functional structure has its own strengths and weaknesses. The managers should consider the actual circumstance of their own organization to decide whether or not they will use this kind of structure, such as, the type of organization, the size of organization and the external environment of an organization. An appropriate organizational structure can help the organization working in a good condition, operating efficiently and developing rapidly.
Reference
BREWS, Peter and CHRISTOPHER, Tucci. (2004) Exploring the Structural Effects of Internetworking. Strategic Management Journal, 25(5), 429–452.
ANUMB, Catherine and MALIK, Khalfan. (2002) Organisational structures to support concurrent engineering in construction. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 102(5), 260–270.
KUSHNUMA, Irani (2007). Type of Organizational structures. [online]. Last accessed 21 August 2011 at:
, Donna (2011). The Functional Structure of an Organization. [online]. Last accessed 24 August 2011 at: http://www.ehow.com/about_6134117_functional-structure-organization.html
TALHA, Siddiqui (2005). Organizational structure. Massachusetts, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.