Tourism Services Management

Service quality

''Using the information that you gathered during the service quality workshop, examine how service quality can be measured within national tourist offices and assess how the findings from such measures can be used to make recommendations for improvements in service quality.''

January 2009

Contents

Contents 1

Introduction 2

. Theory 2

3. Practice 4

4. Recommendations 6

Conclusion 6

Appendix 7

Bibliography 12

Introduction

This report will examine how service quality can be measured within national tourist offices following the service quality workshop. This workshop had been undertaken at the end of November 2008, in to three different tourist boards, Morocco, Hong Kong and India. Different information on personal visit, telephone call and website were gathered for each of these tourist boards. In the first part of the report, theories about service quality and how it can be measured will be discussed. Then, in the second part of the report, the theories will be illustrated with the information gathered during the service quality workshop. Finally, some recommendations will be made for improvements in service quality.

The aim of the report is to assess how the findings from such measures can be used to make recommendations for improvements in service quality.

. Theory

First of all, it is important to define what service quality means, because quality in service industry is different to quality in manufacturing. In manufacturing, quality means zero defects (Foley et al, 1997). Whereas in service industry, Cooper et al cited in Baum (2006, p.84) distinguish 'three characteristics which separate tourism as service from manufactured goods': intangibility, perishability and inseparability (Foley et al, 1997; Williams and Buswell, 2003).Goods are tangibles whereas services are intangibles (Williams and Buswell, 2003). Intangibility means that the product cannot be displayed. Perishability signifies that the service which has not been sold is lost and inseparability 'involves the simultaneous production and consumption of the service' (Foley et al, 1997, p.6; Williams and Buswell, 2003; Baum, 2006).

It is also necessary to explain the difference between service quality and customer satisfaction (Gabbott and Hogg, 1997; Johnston and Clark, 2005; Zeithaml et al, 2006). 'Satisfaction is the customer's evaluation of a product or service in terms of whether that product or service has met the customer's needs and expectations' (Zeithaml et al, 2006, p.110). Furthermore, according to Zeithaml et al (2006) and Johnston and Clark (2005), customer expectations are influenced by different factors such as price, customer's mood, word-of-mouth, company marketing, past experience as well as personal needs. Nevertheless, service quality is an element of the customer satisfaction. When customers judge the quality of service they look at five different dimensions (Zeithaml et al, 2006). According to Kunst and Lemmink (1997), Parasuraman, Zeithaml and Berry (PZB) classified ten dimensions in 1985 and, in 1988 they cut down to five: tangibility, reliability, responsiveness, assurance and empathy (Fitzsimmons and Fitzsimmons, 2008). The meanings given by Zeithaml et al (2006) for each of the dimensions are the following:
Join now!


- Tangibility is the appearance of physical elements;

- Reliability is 'the ability to perform the promised service dependably and accurately' (p.117);

- Responsiveness is the 'willingness to help customers and provide prompt service' (p.117);

- Assurance can be defined as the competence, courtesy, credibility and security;

- Empathy is the 'individualized attention given to customers (p.117).

Moreover, another model contributes to the customers' perceptions: the Grönroos's model. In 1982, he found two dimensions in service quality: technical and functional quality. The technical quality is what the consumer receives, ...

This is a preview of the whole essay