What are the characteristics of an autocratic group leader? How successful are such leaders in motivating members of their group?

Authors Avatar

What are the characteristics of an autocratic group leader? How successful are such leaders in motivating members of their group?

Group working is conceived to be an important part of individual development as a group relies on the cohesion of skills through the harnessing of separate talents and uniting them to achieve more than previously. This group cohesion relies on a type of equity between each individual however it can be seen that all groups require a leader that can motivate the group. The role of leader can be often divided into four types of leaderships, firstly, the collective leadership, where the group itself avoid the concept of a leader and work as equals where status as power are assigned equally and actions are taken as a group decision. Secondly, a laissez-fair leadership role can be adopted where not one person or sub-group takes responsibility for the actions within the group. This type of leadership does not generally work well and little is achieved other than confusion. The third type of leader would be a democratic one. This is where the group comes to decision from all members taking an active role without domination, leading to more united efforts however there may still be an ‘elected’ leader or a rotated leadership role that would produce equity within the group. The fourth and final leadership role would be an autocratic leader where an individual takes charge out of his or her decision.

Join now!

 An autocratic group leader imposes their will upon the rest of the group. This type of leader is not put into a position of power due to a democratic decision, thus the term ‘autocratic group leader’, and is put into power by either hierarchical placement or by taking control independently. As a result of this, other group members may feel distressed by the fact that the autocratic leader may impose in the individual’s personal boundaries creating a hostile atmosphere between the group leader and the group itself. This could then suggest that the general motivation of the group would ...

This is a preview of the whole essay