What determines quality within an organisation? Describe and comment on the usefulness of the 7 quality tools available to management - What is quality?

Authors Avatar
What determines quality within an organisation?

Describe and comment on the usefulness

of the 7 quality tools available to management

What is quality?

A motor vehicle such as Rolls-Royce is widely acknowledged by consumers as being a product of pure quality, therefore people are prepared to pay the high asking price of such a vehicle, but luxury products does not necessarily equate to quality. Walnut dashboards and white kid leather seats are not a lot of good if the engine fails when the weather begins to get bad. Alternatively, you can get relatively cheap goods that can be of a high quality. Take machine copying paper for example. This you can purchase for very little initial outlay and yet this smooth, white paper which is less then 0.01 inches thick copies without

showing the print on the reverse.

Quality implies fitness for use, alternatively quality means conformance to requirements. So both the customer as well as the manufacturer have a say when trying to define the word quality. Most working definitions around today usually involve the concepts of consistency, reliability and lack of errors/defects worded somewhere in the definition.

The principle of the quality professional has changed considerably in recent years. From its modest beginnings in the manufacturing department, it is now expected along with other infrastructure professions such as IT, HR and Finance, to contribute at the level of the organisation in question.

David Straker, the author of the article What is quality? That first appeared in Quality World, the Journal of the Institute for Quality Assurance which is found in the Harvard Business Review, 2000 considers both existing definitions of the word quality and tries to come up with a few new ideas of his own.

At its simplest level quality can be said to answer these two questions - 'What is wanted?' and 'How do we do it?'. Alternatively, the area that has always been associated with the word quality is the area of processes. From the years of the ISO 9000, to the modern day techniques such as total quality management or (TQM) as it is more commonly known, quality professionals specify, measure, improve and re-engineer processes to ensure that people get what they want.

Where are we now?

There are many variations for the definition quality, but the most widely used definition in the field of operations are as follows: -

* 'Conformance to requirements' - Crosby

* 'Fitness for use' - Juran

* 'The totality of characteristics of an entity that bear on its ability to satisfy stated and

implied needs' - ISO 8402:1994

* Quality models for business, including the Deming Prize, the EFQM excellence model

and the Balrige award

Criticisms

Many spectators in the field of operations management believe that Crosby's definition can easily be discarded. In their views, if the requirements are wrong, then failure is almost certainly guaranteed. His focus is in the area of quality assurance. Crosby believed that

'without a specification, quality can not be measured, therefore can not be controlled' he went on 'You can not have zero defects if you do not have a standard against which to measure the defectiveness'.
Join now!


This seemed to reflect the early days of operations management where quality was just purely all about the product without any consideration of other variables and processes.

However, Juran seemed to take a step a bit further down the value chain, to the use of the product or service (at which point customers had forced their way into the picture), he still presupposes that outsiders can fully understand how the product will be used, which is a great challenge, and not always possible! (Staker, Harvard Business Review:2000) As Deming himself said 'Some things are unknown and ...

This is a preview of the whole essay