THE NEW COMMUNICATION ERA: ONLINE WORD OF MOUTH

Mehmet Can SEVEN

105609034

İSTANBUL BİLGİ ÜNİVERSİTESİ

SOSYAL BİLİMLER ENSTİTÜSÜ

İŞLETME YÜKSEK LİSANS PROGRAMI

                             Dr.  Murat YÜCELEN

2008

                                                                                               

THE NEW COMMUNICATION ERA: ONLINE WORD OF MOUTH

Mehmet Can SEVEN

105609034

PROJE DANIŞMANININ ADI SOYADI (İMZASI) :

.....................................

KOMİSYON ÜYESİNİN ADI SOYADI (İMZASI) :

.....................................

PROJENİN ONAYLANDIĞI TARİH :

..........................................................

(bu tarih SBE tarafından yazılacaktır)

                                                                                                           

ABSTRACT

The study seeks to identify the importance of word of mouth especially in today’s digital world. The critical question was how consumer decisions are affected by other consumers’ recommendations. The world has changed and the question has changed too. Now the new critical question is how marketing strategies should adjust to new online era, in which communication way changed through social networks, in order to control perception of consumers. Because the broad reach of online word of mouth gives consumers tremendous power to influence brand perceptions.

There are a lot of literatures and surveys saying that traditional advertising methods have just lost power compared to online word of mouth. Consumers started to create their own messages and share opinions by reaching thousands or even millions of people via this social networks. Facebook, the star of this social networking sector, proved that online word of mouth is enough to reach 59 million people and created a powerful new model of communication like a giant word of mouth engine.

In this study, exploratory research design is used in order to have a qualitative understanding of the impact of word of mouth in marketing by examining “Facebook” case. The results are paralel with literatures and surveys conducted to understand the effect of word of mouth. The results indicate that Facebook could reach 49 out of  51 undergraduate students by using social networking which a promising new line of business.

                                                                                                                                                           

TABLE OF CONTENTS

  1. INTRODUCTION

II. LITERATURE REVIEW

III. THE CONCEPT of MARKETING MIX

IV. SURVEYS STUDYING THE EFFECTS OF WORD OF MOUTH

        IV. 1. Surveys of Online Purchase Behavior

IV. 2. Nielsen Online Global Consumer Survey 2007

IV. 3. DoubleClick's Touchpoints Surveys of Online Consumers

          IV.        3.1. The DoubleClick Touchpoints III survey – 2005

          IV.        3.2. The DoubleClick Touchpoints IV survey – 2006

          IV.        3.3.The DoubleClick Touchpoints survey – 2007

V. WORD of MOUTH MARKETING

        V. 1.Concept of Word of Mouth Marketing

V. 2. Social Networks and Viral Marketing

VI. FACEBOOK

        VI. 1.Presentation of Facebook

        VI. 2. The Facebook Timeline

        VI. 3. Facebook Statistics

                VI . 3.1.General Growth

                VI.  3.2.User Demographics

                VI.  3.3.User Engagement

                VI.  3.4.Applications

                VI.  3.5.International Growth

VI . 4.Facebook and New Business Concepts

             VI.        4.1.Business Solutions                                                                                  

                

                       VI.  4.2.Revenue Sources of Facebook

                VI.  4.3. Success of Facebook

VII. SURVEY RESULTS

        VII.  1. Aim of the Research

        VII.  2. Methodology

  1. 3. Survey Results

VII.   4. Charts

VIII. CONCLUSION

REFERENCES

APPENDİX

                                                                                                                                                         

I. INTRODUCTION

A brand name is a legally registered name but the value of a brand is much more than that. Perception in the minds of customers exposes the value of the brand. Since consumers have a freedom of choice, marketers try to shape perceptions with specific marketing strategies by creating marketing mix. In time, four “P’s” of marketing mix has become four “C’s” with rising importance of consumers. All these efforts are to control consumers’ perception. However there is an influencer that companies do not have significant control over. That is word of mouth that substantially decreases companies’ control over consumers’ brand perceptions.

There is a lot of literature studying the effects of word of mouth communication on consumers’ purchase behavior. All studies say that people most believe and trust information from like-minded people. However, today the importance of word of mouth is rising very frequently as people can reach thousands or even millions of people via internet that is constantly changing the face of marketing. So  the study seeks to identify the importance of word of mouth especially in today’s digital world.

In this study a survey is conducted in order to have a qualitative understanding of the impact of word of mouth in marketing by examining “Facebook” case.

                                                                                                                                   

II. LITERATURE REVIEW

When we consider the brand history, a traditional definition of a brand comes up as: “the name, term, sign, symbol, or design, or a combination of them, intended to identify the goods or services of one seller or group of sellers and to differentiate them from those of competitors” (Kotler, 2002). However, today, brands are much more than that. A brand signifies a cluster of rational needs as well as emotional needs such as prestige, style, distinctiveness, social reassurance etc. (Chernatony, 2000). In order to be distinctive in this competitive world, a brand needs a clear positioning, expressed through its name, identity and all aspects of products, services, behavior (Clifton, 2004), and needs to be both rational as well as perceivable.

Consumers have a freedom of choice and so a marketer must attract their attention towards the brand by showing that the provided services or products meet their needs, and they are consistently superior to others. What logical steps can be taken to convince consumers to actually buy the proposed product or service? Consumer loyalty can no longer be gained solely by adding new functional attributes to the product. These functional attributes can be easily copied and the differences between product and its competitors will be minimized in short time. This leads to the perceived similarity of the products. Therefore, for an effective marketing strategy, product differentiation should be complemented by emotional branding. In order to achieve emotional branding, brands must take their places in the minds of the consumer through their own experiences and satisfaction. Gobé (2001) said “We must develop an emotional connection by proposing customer centric and personal experience which moves brand from functional product to an emotional product”.

Consumer brand perceptions are created by the four P’s of the marketing mix; Product, Price, Place and Promotion. The new concept C’s were developed by Robert Lauterborn and put forward by Philip Kotler reflecting a more client-oriented marketing philosophy. Product becomes Customer needs and wants, Price becomes Cost to the user, Place becomes Convenience and Promotion becomes Communication.

                                                                                                                                             

No company can completely control how consumers perceive its brand. Nevertheless,  companies have significant control over some of the influences other than word of mouth which substantially decreases companies’ control over consumers brand perceptions.

Word of mouth can be described as the act of consumers providing information to other consumers often through everyday conversations. People routinely discuss brands with each other as part of their normal interactions. According to one study conducted by a word of mouth research firm, the Keller Fay Group, “people discuss about a dozen brands each day” (Story, 2006).  This research shows the importance of offline word of mouth. So there is good reason to believe that word of mouth has more potential impact than any other communication channel because word of mouth affects consumer purchasing behavior. Word of mouth makes customer ambassador of your brand.(Gobé, 2001). Consumers most believe and trust information from like-minded consumers (Dunne, 2005).

There is a lot of literature studying the effects of word of mouth communication on consumer behavior. Moreover there are many theoretical studies that support the idea that word of mouth impacts consumers’ purchase decisions. Banerjee’s study (as cited in Godes & Mayzlin, 2004) presents two theoretical models suggesting that people are influenced by opinions of others. Reingen et al. ’s study (as cited in Godes & Mayzlin, 2004) conduct a survey in order to measure brand preference similarity as a function of whether consumers lived together in a closed community like a sorority house. Since living together provides for more opportunities for interaction and communication, consumers who lived together had more similar brand preferences than those who did not.

Today, Internet presents a new channel to marketers to strengthen, expand and market the brand. This new medium is constantly changing the face of marketing and is presenting many possibilities for branding process. As Deborah Chae and Andy Bateman (2002) state the customer is just a click away.

In the electronic environment, consumers are active co-producers of value, further reducing owners’ control over brands. If brands are to thrive on the internet, brand owners need to develop conversations with markets, rather than monotone monologues in order to understand what they want and need (Chernatony, 2001 & Dunne, 2005). Also, to thrive, a looser form of brand control is needed, welcoming the active participation of consumers. Customers learn about brands through electronic conversations with other customers and brand owners need to listen and respond to these conversations (Chernatony, 2000).

When some people visit a brand’s web site they don’t just want to interact with the brand, but also with like minded people. The brand is the host, who needs to welcome new visitors. It facilitates introductions to others and ensures that in a relaxed and open environment, visitors can form their own community (Chernatony, 2003). After a while, this will generate an emotional bond between the consumer and the brand. Moreover, this bond will be even stronger as it will be shared with the community.  Community participation is a unique lever for brands in terms of generating credibility and relevance and even differentiation. It is a way of extending the footprint of the brand (Chae & Bateman, 2002). If you can create communities of common interest, using forums, reviews, and comparative product information, your customers will return to the site and will come to depend on it for information and services (, 2000).

Internet helps to create a new word of mouth content that a consumer can reach thousands or even millions of potential consumers and affect the brand perception of these consumers. However a person can reach only a limited number of people via offline word of mouth. Therefore it can be said that word of mouse spreads even faster than word of mouth. A person’s opinion no longer impacts just their friends; through the Internet, people can now share their opinions and experiences with the world.

Marketing managers are increasingly interested in word of mouth communication and taking actions in order to influence, directly or indirectly, word of mouth. Because they believe that word of mouth is often an important driver of consumer behavior and a product’s success is related to the word of mouth that it creates. Godes & Mayzlin (2007) thought that "Firm-created word of mouth marketing as a hybrid between traditional advertising and consumer word of mouth in that the former is firm-initiated and firm-implemented while the latter is customer-initiated and customer-implemented. Word of mouth marketing, on the other hand, may be characterized as being firm-initiated but customer implemented".

There exists a lot of empirical evidence showing the effect of word-of mouth on the products’ sales. For instance, Arndt’s study (as cited in Navarro, 2006) found that a positive word of mouth about a new food product makes it more likely to be purchased. The studies in Chevalier & Mayzlin, Manchanda et al., Godes & Mayzlin, Van den Bulte & Lilien,  Foster & Rosenzweig (as cited in Godes & Mayzlin, 2007) showed that naturally-occurring word of mouth can drive important outcomes on sales.

Godes & Mayzlin (2007) empirically demonstrated a new result with using a field data that the firm can create word of mouth marketing that drives sales. This is the first study that demonstrates that word of mouth created by the firm’s actions rather than simply positive product experiences can have such an effect. From a managerial perspective, this result gives an important outcome that not only is word of mouth important but it’s actually something that is under the firm’s control. So  firms interested in adopting “buzz management” — the proactive creation of word of mouth — as an element of their promotional mix. Most of the marketers focus on generating buzz among consumers, often by distributing free products. Godes & Mayzlin (2007) presented an example for a word of mouth marketing activity in their paper. A worldwide leader in children's and family leisure time entertainment products, Hasbro in 2001 tried to “engineer” word of mouth among their customers rather than hoping that satisfied customers would tell people about their products. The firm took the actions to increase the number of conversations between consumers. The implementation of its word of mouth campaign played a primary role in its marketing effort during that time period.

Join now!

According to Godes & Mayzlin (2004) for an effective “buzz management” the firm should measure word of mouth. To paraphrase Edward Deming, “You can’t manage what you can’t measure.” Word of mouth measurement would be important for market research. So the firm should identify the causal link between word of mouth and future sales and must also recognize that word of mouth is an outcome of past sales.  

Measuring word of mouth was a complex issue. How should the data be collected? Since the information is created and exchanged in private conversations, direct observation traditionally has been ...

This is a preview of the whole essay