in an atmosphere that is playful and engaging. With children this can be done through word games, riddles, nursery rhymes. (Yopp and Yopp, 2000,(Schuele & Bondreau, 2008) Follow up studies are beginning to be done of children who had previously received
training in PA. Results have shown that PA training not only affects children in the short term but has long term influence as well. One researcher, Gail Gillion, conducted a study with children with language impairment which was published in 2000. These children received PA training and progressed significantly testing at or above their reading level. Dr. Gillion followed up with these children eleven months later and the majority of these gains had been maintained (Gillion 2002.) There are many tests available to test PA and phonemic awareness skills. Before any testing is done in order for the results to be valid some accommodations may be necessary. Individuals with unintelligible speech will need a nonverbal means of response. Those clients who have shown to have attention and memory issues will need to take even more breaks in testing than their typical peers. Children who are suspected of having hearing impairment need to have a testing environment that is free from any level of distraction. The PA test results need to be evaluated with other speech and language testing results. Opponents of PA training do not believe that it is the answer to all language problems. They caution that any testing and intervention should be addressed looking at the child with a holistic perspective. (Gillion 2007) As noted earlier PA is developed along a continuum, because of this PA tests are categorized by skill with a suggested grade level. Tests given in this PA are used to either identify children who may need extra help and/or to later measure progress if intervention has been implemented.The tests listed in this document have been shown to be valid, reliable and trusted predictors of future reading ability. The tests included have reliability scores above .90. The majority of PA tests are designed for kindergarteners to take in the second half of their school year. It is at this time that children should be developing beginning reading skills. The Test of Phonological Awareness is given to a group of six to eight students. It is a “measure of phonemic sensitivity [that] strongly predicts which students will demonstrate high segmenting ability following small-group instruction in phonemic awareness (Chard, 1999.)” The Yopp-Singer Test of phoneme segmentation is structured not only a test but also as a teaching tool. The children are tested individually. The child is shown a word and then is asked to name each phoneme in that word. When the child gives a response they are told if it is correct, or if it is not they are told what the correct response should have been. The Bruce test of phoneme deletion is a test that measures phoneme deletion. Phoneme deletion is a much harder skill on the PA continuum. The test is given individually and is used to identify students who may be at risk for developing beginning literacy skills (Chard, 1999.) PA has been identified by multiple researchers and numerous studies to be “a powerful predictor of reading and spelling success in the early school years (Hogan, Catts and Little, 2005; Schuele and Boudreau, 2008; Shaywitz and Shaywitz, XXXX;Yopp and Yopp 2000; Gillion, 2005; Gillion and McNeil, 2007.) The attention that PA has received is well deserved and when a part of a literacy program that is taught with intention has made a big difference in children’s lives (Schuele and Boudreau, 2008).
PHONOLOGICAL AWARENESS
9
References Banai, K., Hornickel, J., Skoe, E., Nicol, T., Zecker, S., & Kraus, N. (2009). Reading and subcortical auditory function. Cerebral Cortex, 19 (11), 2699-2707. Retrieved from Reading and Subcortical Auditory Function Cerebral Cortex November 2009;19:2699-2707 doi:10.1093/cercor/bhp024 Advance Access publication March 17, 2009 Carrol. , & Snowling (2004). Development of phonological awareness. Retrieved from http:// www.speechpathology.com/articles/development-of-phonological-awarenessskill-1200 Yopp., & Yopp, (2000). Supporting phonemic awareness development in the classroom. The Reading Teacher, 54(2), 130-143. Chard, D. (1999) ldonline. In Awareness: Instructional and Assessment Guidelines Retrieved
November 17, 2011, from http://www.ldonline.org/article/6254/
Gillion, G. (2002). Follow-up investigating the benefits of phonological awareness intervention for children with spoken language impairment. International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders, 37(4), 381-400. Hogan, T.P., Catts, H., & Little, T. (2005). The relationship between phonological awareness and reading: Implications for the assessment of phonological awareness. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in the Schools, 36, 285-293.
PHONOLOGICAL AWARENESS 10 Kirk, C., & Gillion, G. (2007). Longitudinal effects of phonological awareness intervention on morphological awareness in children with speech impairment. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 38 (4), 342-352.Retrieved from lshss.asha.org/cgi/content/short/38/4/342 Lance, Dee interview November 14, 2011 Love, Reilly (2007) Phonological Awareness - Preparing for Literacy. Love and Reilly Newsletter, 21.Retrieved from URL http://www.loveandreilly.com.au/ articleandextras.html Schuele, C., & Bondreau, D. (2008). Phonological awareness intervention:beyond the basics . Language, Speech and Hearing Services in Schools, 39, 3-20. Shaywitz, S. E., & Shaywitz, B. A. (2004). The new science of reading and its implications for the classroom. Education Canada, 44(1), 20-23. Tallal, P. (2003). Dr. Paula Tallal video: February 10 2003 [Web]. Retrieved from http:// www.childrenofthecode.org/pvid/tallal/part1.htm Tallal, P. (2003). Dr. Paula Tallal - neuroscience, phonology and reading: The oral to written language continuum [interview transcript] february 10 2003 [Web]. Retrieved from http://www.childrenofthecode.org/interviews/tallal.htm Yopp. , & Yopp, (2000). Supporting phonemic awareness development in the classroom. The Reading Teacher, 54(2), 130-143.
Phonemic Awareness and Phonics
Phonological processing difficulties are often at the heart of the difficulties that struggling readers face (McNeil & Johnston, 2004). Struggling readers are inefficient in using phonological processing information when engaging in reading related activities (McNeil & Johnston, 2004). Further, struggling readers often have shorter memory than successful readers which makes applying, maintaining and retrieving phonological information extremely difficult (McNeil & Johnston, 2004). An important component of phonological awareness is phonemic awareness which constitutes the individual sounds that each letter of the alphabet makes. Over the past several years, an increasing amount of emphasis has been placed on the importance of phonemic awareness and a student’s emerging reading skills (Hempenstall, 1997). Phonemic awareness is a critical aspect of learning to read because it focuses solely on the awareness of individual phonemes rather than on phonics as a whole (Hempenstall, 1997). As a result, phonemic awareness is broken down into six different categories: matching, isolation, substitution, blending, segmenting and deletion. When children are able to successfully master these six categories then they are more likely to also be successful with reading in general as well as learn to read faster (Byrne & Fielding-Barnsley, 1991). Additionally, students have the capacity to learn phonemic awareness with just short amounts of time dedicated to its practice (Byrne & Fielding-Barnsley, 1991). These six categories are each presented and include a lesson plan designed to teach each particular skill to students in a relatively short amount of time.
Matching
Grade Level: First Grade
Time Required: 45 minutes
Objective: The students will match beginning phonemes in words (Saiegh-Haddard, 2007).
Materials: phoneme picture cards and phoneme header cards
Procedure:
- The students will gather as a whole group. The teacher will review beginning sounds with students and will allow students the chance to practice beginning letter sounds.
- The teacher will show the students a set of phoneme picture cards which each have a different picture on them. The teacher will also show the students the phoneme header cards. The phoneme header cards each have a picture that begins with a different letter sound (i.e. “sled” for “s” or “dog” for “d”). The phoneme picture cards each have a different picture on them as well. The purpose of the activity is for students to take each phoneme picture card and place it below the corresponding phoneme header card in order to match the beginning letter sound. For example, if the phoneme picture card shows a picture of a sock it would be placed under the “sled” header card. The class participates in two or three examples together.
- The students are then each given their own set of phoneme header cards and phoneme practice cards and participate in the activity individually.
Assessment: The whole group activity can be used as a pre assessment to ensure that all students understand how to match beginning letter sounds. During the individual activity the teacher will assist struggling students with one on one intervention. The completed activities will serve as a final assessment for the lesson. (The cards can be glued to paper to make it easier for students to turn in.)
Isolation
Grade Level: First Grade
Time Required: 45 minutes
Objective: Students will identify a particular sound in a spoken word (Saiegh-Haddard, 2007).
Materials: letter cards (one set for each student)
Procedure:
- The students will gather as a whole group to review what a beginning sound or ending sound of a word is referring to. Each student will also receive a set of letter cards – each with one letter of the alphabet printed on them.
- The teacher will guide the students as they hold up the letter card that corresponds to teacher given directions. The teacher will read a word out loud and ask the students to hold up the letter card that shows what sound they hear at either the beginning of the word or the end of the word. For example, “hold up the letter card that has the ending sound in the word ‘cat.’”
- The teacher presents a series of words and checks the work of each student as the words are read.
Assessment: The entire activity will serve as an assessment since the teacher will be able to check the understanding of each student during the course of the lesson. This will allow the teacher to continue the activity as necessary to ensure that all students grasp the concept of isolation.
Substitution
Grade Level: First Grade
Time Required: 45 minutes
Objective: Students will trade one sound for another sound in order to form new words (Saiegh-Haddard, 2007).
Materials: word family cards, individual letter cards
Procedure:
- The students will gather as a whole group. The teacher will review the word families that will be used in the lesson (i.e. “at” or “in”). Then students will practice reading a variety of words that each has one of these word families in them. Finally, the teacher will write several words on the board. The students will read the first word and then wait while the teacher changes one of the letters in the word and then the students will read the new word. For example, the teacher could write “pin” on the board and have students read the word. Then the teacher could change the “p” to an “f” to form the new word “fin”. Then students read the new word.
- Students each receive a set of word family cards and a set of individual letter cards. They are broken into groups of 2. Within each group, students take turns forming a word, allowing their partner to read the word, and then switching one of the letters in the word to form a new word. Students have ample time to come up with as many words as they can.
- Students come back into the whole group and have the opportunity to model the teacher by sharing an example of one of their substitutions by writing it on the board.
Assessment: The first whole group activity serves as a pre assessment in order to ensure that all students understand the substitution concept. During the activity the teacher will circulate the room in order to assist struggling students through one on one intervention. The completed activity as well as the second whole group activity will be considered the post assessment.
Blending
Grade Level: First Grade
Time Required: 45 minutes
Objective: Students will put spoken sounds together to form words (Saiegh-Haddard, 2007).
Materials: picture cards, letter blends cards, alphabet letter cards
Procedure:
- Students will gather into a whole group to practice and review blending. The teacher will write a series of spoken sounds on the board and students will read each sound and form the sounds into a word. For example, the teacher would write /ch/ /i/ /ck/ /en/ on the board and students would read each sound and then blend it into the word “chicken.”
- Students will each receive a set of blended sound cards as well as a set of alphabet sound cards. The teacher will hold up a picture and students will need to find the appropriate cards in order to spell the word. For example, the teacher will hold up a picture of a stamp. Students will need to find the cards with the /st/, /a/ and /mp/ on them and line them up in the correct order on their desk. As a whole group, the students will then blend the sounds to read the word.
- Students will then be broken into groups of two and each group will receive their own set of picture cards. The same activity described above will be repeated in each group – students will take turns holding up the picture and creating the corresponding word.
Assessment: The whole group practice session will serve as the pre assessment to make sure that all students understand how to blend words. During the activity, the teacher will circulate the room in order to provide one on one intervention to students who are struggling. The group activity will be considered the post assessment.
Segmenting
Grade Level: First Grade
Time Required: 45 minutes
Objective: Students will break words apart into individual sounds (Saiegh-Haddard, 2007).
Materials: word lists, scissors
Procedure:
- The students will gather as a whole group and practice segmenting words. The teacher will write a word on the board and the students will work together to sound it out. Then the teacher will break the sounds apart by separating the words into segments. For example, the word “cat” will be written on the board. As the students sound the word out, the teacher will segment it by writing /c/ /a/ /t/.
- Students are each given a list of words printed in large text. Their assignment is to sound out and read each word. They are then required to cut each word into segments to represent each individual sound they hear as they read.
Assessment: The whole group activity will be considered the pre assessment in order to ensure that all students understand how to segment words. The completed segmenting activity will be considered the post assessment.
Deletion
Grade Level: First Grade
Time Required: 45 minutes
Objective: Students will eliminate a letter/sound from a series of words to form new words (Saiegh-Haddard, 2007).
Materials: word lists, scissors
Procedure:
- Students will gather as a whole group to learn how to delete letters/sounds from words in order to make new words. The teacher will model by writing several words on the board. The students will read each word and then the teacher will delete a letter/sound from each and the students will then read the new words. For example, the teacher will write the word “tin” on the board. Students will read the word, then the teacher will delete the “t” to form the new word “in” and students will then read that new word.
- Students will each receive a list of words printed in large font. They will read each word one by one. The teacher will tell them what sound or letter to cut off of each word. Students will then read each new word.
Assessment: The whole group instruction will serve as the pre assessment so the teacher knows that all students understand the concept of deletion. The completed word activity will serve as the post assessment.
Transition to Writing
Once students have a firm understanding of phonemic awareness, then phonics can be introduced. Phonics allows students to blend the auditory component of language with the visual component of language in order to use their skills to begin writing. Exemplary literacy teachers are able to provide a foundation in phonemic awareness in order to ensure that students are successful as they transition from listening to sounds to writing sounds (Brice, 2004). The written component of language relies on phonemic awareness so it is absolutely essential to teach students how to match, isolate, substitute, blend, segment and delete different letter sounds in order to ensure future writing success (Brice, 2004). Further, focusing on the different components of language in order to blend the auditory aspect of language with the written aspect of language ensures higher levels of success (Brice, 2004). The concepts of blending and isolation will be applied to show the important link between listening and writing because “the interactive liaison between composing and constructing a written message and reading it back provides opportunities for noticing some of the ways in which language works, while forming letters calls attention to perceptual forms and critical features” (Clay, 1998).
Blending and Phonics
Grade Level: First Grade
Time Required: 45 minutes
Objective: Students will determine what letter is missing from words to make them complete.
Materials: blending worksheets
Procedure:
- Students will gather as a whole group. The teacher will write a series of words on the board omitting a letter from each. The students will examine and sound out each word to determine what letter is missing from each. This letter will be written in the blank.
- Students will each receive a worksheet with the same activity to complete individually. The student will read each word, fill in the blank with the missing letter and then write the new word.
Assessment: The pre assessment will occur during the whole group instruction to ensure that all students understand blending and writing. The completed worksheets will serve as the post assessment.
Isolation and Phonics
Grade Level: First Grade
Time Required: 45 minutes
Objective: Students will isolate different letter sounds and write new words while playing a game.
Materials: lined paper, pencils
Procedure:
- Students will gather as a whole group to play a game. First the teacher will say a word and students will isolate each sound as slowly as they can. Then students will isolate each sound as fast as they can. Last, the students will write the word on their lined paper. The game will continue until the teacher has introduced several words.
Assessment: The game will serve as the assessment for the activity during the game as well as through the use of the written words.
Brice, Roanne G. (2004). Connecting oral and written language through applied writing
strategies. Intervention in School and Clinic, 40 (1): 38 – 47.
Byrne, B., & Fielding-Barnsley, R. (1991). Evaluation of a program to teach phonemic
awareness to young children. Journal of Educational Psychology, 83: 451-455.
Clay, Marie. (1998). By different paths to common outcomes. York, ME: Stenhouse.
Hempenstall, Kerry. (1997). The role of phonemic awareness in beginning reading: a review.
Behavior Change, 14 (4): 201 – 214.
McNeil, Alan M. & Johnston, Rhona S. (2004). Word length, phonemic and visual similarity
effects in poor and normal readers. Memory and Cognition, 32 (5): 687 – 695.
Saiegh-Haddard, Elinor. (2007). Epilinguistic and metalinguistic phonological awareness may be
subject to different constraints. First Language, 27 (4): 385 – 405.