“Symbols could be presented with the pictures that the child already knows and, at a later stage, the pictures could be removed if appropriate”. (ACE, 2000, n.p) ACE also suggests that educational environments are able to purchase software so that symbols can be printed off and used. (Appendix 2)
What are the main theories behind this technique?
“The Makaton Vocabulary was developed in the 1970’s and became, and has remained, one of most pervasive and influential pedagogical approaches for children with severe learning difficulties.” (Sheehy & Duffy, 2009, pg 91) The term Makaton is a derivation from: Margaret Walker-Senior Speech Therapist at the Hospital; Kathy Johnston and Tony Cornforth, both Psychiatric Hospital Visitors from the Association for the Deaf and Dumb (Cornforth, Johnston & Walker, 1974, pg 23). The name Makaton is made up of syllables from the beginning of each of their names Ma-Ka-Ton.
Makaton was “originally designed in the early 1970s for a group of deaf adults, with mental handicap, living in an Institution and for their carers, peers and instructors. Both groups were unable to communicate about their basic needs or shared daily living experiences”. (Walker, 1987, pg1) This then lead individuals to have communication skills that they may never have acquired before.
What are the advantages of using Makaton?
“Unlike BSL, Makaton uses speech as well as actions and symbols. This encourages children to learn many different forms of communication have shown good results in academic and social achievement by those who use it.
Makaton has now been developed and extended to allow access to the Curriculum. “Manual signs and graphic symbols are used together with speech to provide a visual representation of language.” (Bass, 2003, pg20) The Curriculum for Excellence (CfE) (E.D.S, 2007) declares that each individual must achieve their potential, but there is not always enough time for a teacher to provide this. Therefore there is an argument that every class teacher needs access to a classroom assistant to help each pupil to achieve their full potential. The Special Educational Needs and Disability Act 2001 (Legislation, 2001) provided an enhanced education that was right for pupils with SEN. It was aimed at pupils with SEN attending mainstream education and being treated as any other individual pupil. The main aspect of the Act is to make sure that education institutes do not discriminate against disabled pupils. The amended Education Act 1996 turned into a “positive endorsement of inclusion” (DFE, 2001). With this Act parents could send their child to a mainstream school and would be given support, but if they wished their child to go to a special school then this could be arranged as well.
Teachers have the overall responsibility of providing for each individual child’s needs. The teacher is the one who liaises with the child’s parent/carer, to keep them informed about their child’s progress. Teachers need to be aware of any issues that are happening at home since this can affect the child in class. Unfortunately, this rarely occurs, parents do not speak to teachers as often as they should do. It has been noted that “boys are two and a half times more likely to have additional needs than girls” (Frankel 2011). Most classes are made up of pupils from a “variety of backgrounds, not with homogeneous groups of children from the same ethnic origins. An increasing number of students are immigrants, children who live between two languages, two cultures and children with disabilities.” (Cappellini 2005, pg xv) These children need support and understanding, just because they cannot speak or write in English, they still need to learn it. “Schools must recognise individual difference and provide support for pupils” (Flynn, Stainthorp 2006, pg 73)
A teacher’s main priority is to provide each child with the best education which meets individuals needs. “A child with a special educational need is one who has a learning difficulty which calls for special educational provision to be made for them.” (Hall, 2009 pg 4) It is necessary for the teacher to be aware of any indications that could lead to a specific need, such as children who may show signs of struggling with a particular class. A teacher cannot suggest that a child has a specific learning difficulty without support from other adults, including parents and other specialists. “Teachers are taking on responsibility” (Warnock, Norwich, Terzi, 2010, pg 18) to retrain in Makaton so that they have the knowledge and understanding to help the individual pupil. If the school has access to an additional needs department, the teacher should precede here first. The teacher will be involved and have a relationship with staff in this department already. The head teacher needs to become aware of any pupils with SEN. “Head teachers and staff in mainstream, special schools and units ...have the responsibility for meeting the educational, social and care needs of pupils with additional support needs in their schools.” (HMIe, 2004) The school might decide that an educational psychologist or other relevant professionals need to be involved. An educational psychologist is someone who supports children within an educational setting. They aim to help the child in the best way and suggest options to provide appropriate guidance and maximise the child’s learning.
More and More it is noticeable that Makaton resources are being used everywhere within the educational environment. Makaton is used throughout the UK and “has now been adapted and is used within 40 other countries.” (Beukelman & Mirenda, 2005 pg.65) This recourse helps the individual “to encourage expressive speech where possible; to develop an understanding of language through the visual medium of the signs and the logical structure of the sign language.” (Kyle & Woll, 1998, pg33)
Makaton has developed over the years, “there has been a recent surge of interest in using signing with all babies and young children, not just those with special needs”. (Ford, 2006, pg 1) This proves that this technique can be used with anyone to help support communication. Hooper and Walker (2007,pg38) State that Custer and Osguthorpe (1983) believe students with mild and moderate learning disabilities are able to tutor mainstream peers in the use of sign language. This had a great advantage that it helps the individuals to feel that they have a sense of worth because they are given some reasonability, which in turn helps them blossom in to adults who can communicate with the world.
Makaton is now a charity and helps out as many individuals as they can. The charity have links with Apple and “have had days to show how people are using iPads with children and adults with communication needs”. (M.C, 2012, n.p) Another method that the charity has developed is working with BBC’s children’s channel CBeebies. They launched a programme called “Something Special”. (BBC, n.d, n.p) This program is a massive hit with the children but what it shows through fun and entertainment is that children with special needs are no different from everyone else. The ’Something Special’ programme teaches Makaton skills and through their website parents are able to find out more information on Makaton and how to use it with their children through activities and everyday life.
Disadvantages of Makaton
The main opposing view of this method of teaching children language skills is that it may reduce the individualised process of the development of communication. Byler (1985) suggests that pupils should also be introduce to other methods and not rely on Makaton.
Teachers and parents need to be trained properly and understand Makaton so that it can be used to its full potential, if not then errors can arise. “Providing totally individualised vocabularies for students is possible when only a small number of people need augmentative input in any given environment, but if the use of these vocabularies is to occur in an interactive context then very large numbers of interactors will be involved and difficulties in remembering individualised differences are more likely to occur and lead to confusion”. (Walker, 1987, pg3)
Leverton (Cited in Wilce, 2001, n.p) suggests that a major problem is that people start off using Makaton and it works so they then stop using it to its full potential. “We love to hear that people have moved on from using us. But at the same time, we know that the number of communication-impaired children is leaping up, and the need is enormous." Just because something is working, why change it, the people that are responsible for these individuals need to look at why it is working and develop this in to a more positive result.
Conclusion
Through this review it becomes clear that Makaton is so vital. “Helping your child to communicate will totally change their lives. It will mean that you can understand them – this will help boost their self-esteem” (Le Blanc, 2012, pg120). Through this system, children are able to interact with other individuals; it encourages them to interact with others outside of the educational environment. “During 1982 a survey was carried out by Thomas Coram Research institute which indicated that 95% of schools for children with special needs were using Makaton”. (ELCE, 2010 n.p) This proves that this technique works and it used be used throughout the educational environment.
Makaton has a very extensive range of resources that if used correctly, can help anyone who is having difficulties with communication. However language is always changing and Makaton is able to be adjusted at any point. Taylor (cited in Hogg, 1996, pg 415) suggests that Makaton needs to be adapted for other languages that are used within the UK, also that it can be accessible for all individuals that need it. It needs to cover areas of life that might occur such as abuse. Training courses need to be more affordable so that parents, family members and anyone who wishes to learn it can.
Children who have communication skills have every entitlement to learn how to communicate, we take “speech, language and communication and words which most of us use, comfortably and often, taking them for granted that we understand their meaning.” (Kersner & Wright, 2002, pg1) As some individuals understand what we are saying they just cannot reply but through Makaton this resource helps them to communicate.
I have found that using Makaton works from my own experience with my children and watching how it is used at nursery. I have a close friend who has a little boy with speech difficulties and he has really come on since using a small amount of signs to communicate what he is after, he also has a symbol book which he carries around. This technique has benefited him so much that his behaviour has improved and through this method it is noticeable that his communication skills are improving every day too.
To conclude with it has been made aware that children need to receive help at an early stage; parents and teachers need to actively seek assistance and work as part of a team. I plan to develop my knowledge on Makaton and learn how to use it within the classroom, after researching this method I have found that I am even more fascinated with the subject.
Word Count 2565
References
Aiding Communication in Education (ACE) (2000) An Introduction to Symbol: Resources. Available at [Accessed May 2012]
Bass, S.(2003) Special Children, Special Needs: Integrating Children with Disabilities and special needs into your church. London: Church House Publishing
BBC. (N.D.) Something Special. Available at [Accessed May 2012]
Beith, K., Bulman, K., Tassoni, P. and Robinson, M. (2005) Nvq Level 2 Children's Care, Learning and Development Candidate Handbook. Oxford: Heinemann
Beukelman, D.R., & Mirenda, P. (2005). Augmentative and alternative communication: supporting children & adults with complex communication needs. Baltimore, Maryland: Paul H. Brookes Publishing Co.
Byler, J. (1985) The Makaton Vocabulary: an analysis based on recent research. British Journal of Special Education, 12, 3, 113-120
Cappellini, M. (2005) Balancing Reading and Language Learning: A Resource for Teaching English Language Learners. Portland: Stenhouse
Chile, P. (2008) Walker stands down from the Makaton Job. Available at [Accessed May 2012]
Cornforth, A., Johnson, K., & Walker, M.,(1974). Makaton Vocabulary: Teaching Sign Language to the Deaf Mentally Handicapped. Newcastle: Makaton Resource Centre
Department of Education., (2001) Special Educational Needs: Code of Practice. DfES 0581 2001: Government. Available at [Assessed May 2012]
E.D.S. (2007) Curriculum for Excellence- Principles. Available at [Accessed May 2012]
ELCE (2010) East London Communication Enterprise: Making life more accessible through Makaton Communication. Available at [Accessed April 2012]
Flynn, N. Stainthorp, R.(2006) The learning and Teaching of Reading and Writing. : Chichester: Whurr Publishers Limited
Ford, J. (2006) Enhancing Parent and Child Communication: Using Makaton Signing for Babies. London: Makaton Charity
Foreman, P. & Crews, G.(1998) The Down Syndrome Educational Trust. Using Augmentative Communication with Infants and Young Children with Down Syndrome. Vol 5, No.1.Available at [Accessed April 2012]
Frankel (2011) TESS - Collision Course. Available at [Accessed April 2012]
Hall, W,. (2009) Dyslexia in the primary classroom. Exeter: Learning Matters Ltd
Hogg, J. (1996) Communication and Learning disability: briefing and update on developments: Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine, Volume 89. Available at [Accessed May 2012]
Hooper, H. and Walker, M. (2002), Makaton peer tutoring evaluation: 10 years on. British Journal of Learning Disabilities, 30: 38–42. doi: 10.1046/j.1468-3156.2002.00120.x
HMIe. (2004) How good is our school? Quality Management in Education, Inclusion and Equality Part 2: Evaluating education for pupils with additional support needs in mainstream schools. Available at [Accessed May 2012]
Kyle, J.G. & Woll, B. (1998) Sign Language: The Study of death people and their language. Cambridge: The Press Syndicate of The University of Cambridge
Kersner, M & Wright, JA.(2002) How to Manage Communication Problems in Young Children. 3rd Edition. London: David Fulton Publishers Ltd
Makaton (2012) Apple Event. Available at [Accessed May 2012]
Reguson, B. (N.D) Makaton –Much more than just signing! Available at [Accessed May 2012]
Le Blanc, R. (2012) Autism & Asperger’s Syndrome: In Laymans Terms. Netherlands: Raymond Le Blanc
Legislation, Government. (2001) Special Educational Needs and Disability Act 2001. Available at [Accessed May 2012]
Rowlinson, J. (2010) Signed Language. Available at [Accessed May 2012]
Sheehy, K & Duffy, H (2009).The Open University: Attitudes to Makaton in the ages on integration and inclusion. International Journal of Special Education, 24 (2) Available at [accessed April 2012]
Warnock, M. Norwich, B. Terzi, L.(2010) Special Educational Needs: A New Look. London: Continuum
Walker, M.(1985) Symbols for Makaton. London: The Makaton Charity
Walker, M. (1987) The Makaton Vocabulary – Uses and effectiveness. Available at [Accessed May 2012]
Wilce, H.(2001) TES: Sign of the times. Updated May 2008 Available at [Assessed May 2012]
Appendix 1 – How to sign
Appendix 2 – Symbols
To Read To Break To Write We/Us
BoyTeacher Classroom
Girl Friends Sweetshop
Fruit shop
by
loopylou123 (student)
