Wellbeing in Education. Critically explore the relevance and application of the concept of Wellbeing -in your setting with reference to specific examples and a selection of appropriate literature.

Authors Avatar

Critically explore the relevance and application of the concept of ‘Wellbeing’ -in your setting with reference to specific examples and a selection of appropriate literature.

“We often measure wellbeing as happiness or satisfaction with life. The search for happiness is often confused with the pursuit of pleasure, but wellbeing is about more than living ‘the good life’; it is about having meaning in life, about fulfilling our potential and feeling that our lives are worthwhile.” Eckersley, R. 2005. Well & Good: Morality, Meaning and Happiness, 2nd edition

There are many constituent elements to a person’s wellbeing; it is an intricate combination of a person's emotional, social, physical and mental health factors. This includes relationships, money, goals and opportunities.  Wellbeing is linked to how a person feels about themselves and their life. It is believed that the factors that influence wellbeing are interrelated. A job provides not just money but purpose and goals, an education provides a means to better finances and a sense of achievement, relationships can contribute to a sense of belonging. Some factors also make up for the lack of others, a good marriage can counterbalance a lack of friendships, while religious beliefs may comfort a person and assist them in coming to terms with physical illness and their emotional wellbeing.

The concept of ‘Wellbeing’ has greatly increased with the introduction of positive psychology, mainly by Martin Seligman, and is gaining much attention from psychologists and other scientists alike. “The field of positive psychology at the subjective level is about valued subjective experiences: wellbeing, contentment and satisfaction (in the past); hope and optimism (for the future); and flow and happiness (in the present).”

(Seligman & Csikszentmihalyi, 2000, p. 5).

Seligman, M. E. P., & Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2000).

Positive psychology: An introduction.

Positive psychology finds its roots in the humanistic approach of the 20th century, which was dominated by Abraham Maslow, Carl Rogers, and Clark Moustakas and focused heavily on happiness and fulfilment. Such contentment is usually understood in terms of ‘Life fulfilment and satisfaction’, and is often measured by resources such as self-reports or questionnaires such as ‘The Oxford Happiness Questionnaire’ or the ‘Authentic Happiness Questionnaire’ which can be found on the homepage of Dr. Martin Seligman, Director of the Positive Psychology Centre at the University of Pennsylvania where the focus is to promote research, training, education, and the dissemination of positive psychology. Although it can be argued that the use of such measurements cannot be guaranteed as reliable and accurate due to the measurements by which happiness occurs. For example the measurement of happiness where the theory places the focus of happiness on external conditions such as income and status, as many sociological theories do, or within the attitudes and temperament of the individual, as stated by E. Diener, The Science of Well-Being: The Collected Works of Ed Diener, Social Indicators Research Series 37 (P12). Or the validity of the test comes into question as the result will be somewhat influence by many factors including how much sleep they had the night before, are they coming down with a cold, what the weather is like on that particular day.  In order to be valid, a test must be reliable. However it is probably fair to say that the research clearly shows that most people measure their wellbeing by how well their life is going and how content one is with their future opportunities. Suggesting that some kind of hedonistic approach, which focuses on happiness and defines well-being in terms of pleasure attainment and pain avoidance, may well be correct. 

However, Held, 2001, 2002a, pp. 969, 986-987 argues that the concentration on the positive attitude and psychology may, in actual fact, add insult to injury: If people feel bad about life’s many complications and they cannot manage to surpass their pain no matter how hard they try, they could end up feeling even worse. This can lead to a negative attitude and outlook, which is highly detrimental to ones wellbeing. It can lead to a rise in feelings of guilt, low self esteem and a sense of no self worth in addition to whatever was ailing them in the first place. This is a possible inadvertent consequence of a sole approach of positive psychology.

Maslow takes a very understanding approach to both traditional psychologies and the concept of positive psychology stating that psychology has been heavily focused on disorder and dysfunction.  The science of psychology has been far more successful on the negative than on the positive side. It has revealed to us much about man’s shortcomings, his illness, his sins, but little about his potentialities, his virtues, his achievable aspirations, or his full psychological height. It is as if psychology has voluntarily restricted itself to only half its rightful jurisdiction, and that, the darker, meaner half (Maslow, 1954, p. 354).  Maslow, A. H. (1954). Motivation and personality. New York: Harper.

Maslow’s definition does not imply that the rest of psychology needs to be discarded or replaced. Neither does it suggest that psychology should disregard or dismiss the problems that people experience. The value of positive psychology is to complement and broaden the traditional idea of problem focused psychology that has been central for several years. As Maslow (1998) quotes ‘There is only one sure way of motivating learners and that is to ensure that their belonging, self esteem and self actualisation needs are nourished through the learning activities devised. These are the only go buttons’  Eupsychian Management, 1965; republished as Maslow on Management, 1998.

Join now!

Although Maslow’s work has been criticised for its lack of scientific vigour due to the fact that it cannot objectively measure self actualisation, humanism ignores the unconscious mind and the  is difficult to compare, the lessons for facilitators are real enough in motivating learners. It is therefore vital to support and challenge students whilst recognising that all learners are individuals and require a safe, comfortable and friendly environment for them to learn in, (humanistic approach). Creating a respectful, caring and intentionally inviting learning environment is the surest way to encourage student achievement (Purkey and Asp, 1988, 45). You could relate this ...

This is a preview of the whole essay