‘WELLINGTON’S WATERLOO’

The French Revolution played a significant role in the history of Britain.  The ideal of intellectual enlightenment and the idea of an end of a corrupt and antiquated government and monarchist rule, swept across Europe from the summer of 1789.  This followed the highly symbolic storming of the Bastille, and the Declaration of the Rights of man.  However, when the Revolution degenerated into ‘The terror’ of Robespierre’s government by fear and terrorism, intellectual joy turned into conservatism, and a feeling of betrayal.  Politically, the social consequences were profound.  As Britain staggered under the shock of Industrial Revolution, Urbanisation and the creation of a working class, the authoritarian response to the French Revolution, was a series of repressive acts of parliament and social measures, like the suspending of the writ of habeas corpus. Just as the new society cried out for help, Reform was effectively quashed for thirty years.  The French Revolution also gave rise from Corsican outcast to Emperor, of Napoleon Bonaparte.  This man perhaps affected Britain the most, and much as been written about this legendary figure and his wars of aggression.  The object of this essay is, however, to tell the story of Bonaparte’s final fall, in terms of military history and  one engagement, which saw Bonaparte meet an equally illustrious figure, his nemesis and saviour of Europe, Arthur Wellsley, The Duke of Wellington, Soldier and Statesman, and perhaps the greatest Briton of the 19th Century.  He only faced Bonaparte once on the battlefield, in that small deadly space between opposing armies, at Waterloo.  It is the story of that battle that this essay will examine.  

It has defined us as a people whatever Britain has become, our notion of Empire and social structure, and our prejudices were formulated during those traumatic years.  It was the crossroads of our being. In dealing with Wellington, this essay will look at Wellington’s background, his character, and discuss his tactics in dealing with the French.  In particular the essay will examine the events of the 16th June 1815, with the battles at Quatre Bras and Ligney, which brought about the Waterloo battle.  The campaign of Waterloo has been made the subject of many historians, examining in detail, every decision made by the men in the forefront of battle.

But in the midst of these men were brave soldiers battling it out, at Hougoumont, La Haye Sainte and Papelotte, to gain the advantage needed by their Commanders to win.

So who was this man who brought to an end the wars in Europe, and become one of the greatest figures in British history.  Born on the 29th April 1769 in Ireland to the Earl of Mornington, christened Arthur Wesley, he later changed his name to Wellesley. He was educated at Eton College with other aristocratic children, where he enjoyed mathematics and music, the later after his father who was a Professor of Music in Dublin.  He pursued a military career, most of which was spent fighting the French around the world.  During a 20-year period, he fought sixteen campaigns against the French and never lost. (Roberts, 2001)(Apseyhouse [Online].

At first his career was chequered, but he learnt by experience and never repeated his mistakes. He developed a keen sense of how to conduct military operations, take control of situations personally, and more importantly how to care for his troops under very trying conditions. (Weller, 1998).

He was a superb tactician and strategist, employing some ‘revolutionary ‘principles of war’.  On the battlefield “his instincts, his charisma, his judgement and composure under fire, his determination and focus, his courage and confidence made him a worthy opponent of Napoleon and his Marshals”. (Horward)[Online].

But Wellington was a strict disciplinarian, enforcing harsh punishment to offenders in front of the rest of his men as a deterrent.  He once said of his men,

“They are the scum of the earth.  English soldiers are fellows who have enlisted for drink and that is the plain fact; they have all enlisted for drink”. (Speed, 1969).

But he knew the individual quality of his men as well. He knew they had enlisted from differing backgrounds, because of debt, flight or had simply sought the glamour of the army.

His early career had taught him valuable lessons. In particular how to defeat the French Infantry column under certain conditions.

Firstly, the line must be protected in its flanks, for if caught by cavalry it could be rolled up, for example using the advantages of terrain, or in the field of battle, the infantry square.

Secondly, the line must be protected in front by skirmishers.  Wellington in fact increased the number of light troops in order to do this.

Finally the line was not to show itself to the enemy until the last minute.  His favourite technique was to position on the reverse slope of a hill, not the crest where his men could be bombarded by enemy gunners, but just a distance back, and only when the enemy column was within range would they stand and fire. (Speed, 1969)

This was important, as the French marching column was in itself an individual army, with artillery, cavalry and infantry.  The French used massive artillery fire to blow holes into the enemy line, and then penetrate it with cavalry, which rolled it up, to be finished off by the infantry.  This mass of power in most cases intimidated or frightened off the enemy before the battle got going.

But what brought about the battle, for which he became world famous?  In 1814 Napoleon abdicated and it seemed that the Napoleonic wars were over Napoleon was banished to the island of Elba.  As a result, on the 24th January 1815, Wellington was sent as the British envoy to attend the ‘Congress of Vienna’, to decide on the territorial interests of the allies. The world however, had not heard the last of the Emperor. He landed in Southern France on 26 February 1815 with a small number of troops.  Wellington received a message that Napoleon had escaped from Elba and was intending to march on Paris.  The Duke called a meeting of all the heads of governments seeking agreement of mutual support against Napoleon, and the treaty between the allies, known as the Treaty of Chaumont was reaffirmed. The allies realised that this would be a campaign that would finally decide the future of Europe. (Weller, 1998).

The battle of Waterloo was still several days away, and when it came it was the result of the situation following initial engagements at Quatre Bras, Ligney, and Wavre.  The allies were vulnerable at this stage of the proceedings because they were stretched out in a long line, not knowing from which direction Napoleon was going to attack. The plan was that whoever was attacked first would make a token stand whilst then the others came to assist. When in fact the French crossed the border into Belgium on the 15th June, and Napoleons plan was to destroy the British and then Prussian forces, before their Austrian and Russian allies could arrive.

Join now!

Napoleon was to drive a wedge between the British and Prussians so he could deal with one army, and then turn on the other, defeating them both separately.

Napoleon was to lead part of his army against the Prussians at Ligney, whilst his commander Ney was to attack the British at Quatre Bras, but from the following events things did not go to plan.  (Fig 1. Map showing Quatre Bras and Ligney, with the French lines of attack).

The battle at Quatre Bras was fought around a small hamlet of four houses, at the junction between the Charleroi-Brussels Road ...

This is a preview of the whole essay