A Commentary on the Laws of King Alfred, 871-901 A.D.

Authors Avatar

First Year, BA Ancient History and History

HS1015  

A Commentary on the Laws of King Alfred, 871-901 A.D.

The law-codes of King Alfred have proved too many scholars very difficult to date. However, all argue it was late in his reign, perhaps in between the 880s and 890s that they were issued. They survive in the form of two manuscripts; one from the mid-tenth century Manuscript 173 (also known as the ‘A’ Manuscript) at Corpus Christi College, Cambridge and one from the twelfth-century, the Textus Roffensis. The ‘A’ Manuscript was written by two mid tenth century scribes and originally followed the annals for 920 but now follows the final annals of 1070 of the continued chronicle. The Textus Roffensis is a manuscript compiled in the time of Ernhelf, the bishop of Rochester [1115-24] and it is at Rochester Cathedral that the manuscript is still preserved. Portions of the law-codes survive incomplete elsewhere as well. It seems that it is no accident that we still have Alfred’s law-codes. Just as he had used others, particularly King Ine of Wessex, future kings would go on to use Alfred. 

What makes the law-codes so important is that there is a dearth of contemporary charters of the reigns of Alfred and Edward the Elder, his son. The law-codes themselves whilst able to tell us about attitudes towards certain crimes in society, such as theft, murder or treason, as well as ideas regarding religion such as Chapter 43 of the law-code regarding the ‘celebration of mass-days’ we can only learn so much from it. With this in mind and with the lack of contemporary charters, we are left with just a few historical documents that become vital if we are to understand their world at all from the point of view of the contemporaries. We know that ‘the written laws can sometimes be reinforced by evidence from Doomsday Book’ and so know that what we have today can be said to be what were the codes. However there is always the issue of when manuscripts are copied there being clerical errors made by the monks and nuns as well as ‘the translation of the Anglo-Saxon laws [having] its special difficulties’. Frequently they are short and sometimes cryptic in their meaning. They were ‘composed for persons familiar with the general circumstances and thus requiring guidance on a particular issue only’ for example who is to pay compensation and to who. This therefore does help us as historians as it tells us that the general circumstances were known and there was no need for them to be explained.

Join now!

The law-codes themselves give us an insight into the mindset of their author, King Alfred, who writes the introduction in the first person singular. Alfred, along with Asser and other writers saw the Vikings as punishment for sins on an unworthy people. It was this that saw Alfred employ two key policies in his reign to counter the threat to Christianity posed by the Vikings: an educational programme and the burghal system. Alfred would have seen the education of his subjects as a task which would please God and would be the right action in making the people more worthy. Along with this ...

This is a preview of the whole essay