• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Conflict in Vietnam pre-1963 - The Development Of Ho Chi Minh's relations with France and America.

Extracts from this document...


History Coursework Conflict in Vietnam pre-1963 The Development Of Ho Chi Minh's relations with France and America 1) Source A shows us that Vietnamese people hated the French, they called them "invaders". Not only did the poor people hate the French, but also the rich and even children "refused to accept the French occupation of 1883", this shows that they were against the French. The Vietnamese used guerilla warfare to defeat the French "by irregular bands of men protected by the people of the countryside, who hid them and fed them. Source B shows us that the men in the front of the picture is Vietnamese, and the man at the back of the picture is French. They look to be wearing different clothes however they look to be very similar, this is because not all the Vietnamese hated the French, some liked the French, which is why they had joined the their army as I can see in the picture. 2) Agreement Both sources C and D agree about why Vietnam was important to them (the French), they both feel that Vietnam is important to the French army. Source C says that Vietnam is theirs "it is our country" they feel that they are in control of the country "which we feel we belong to". Disagreement These sources also disagree, source D says that it wants Vietnam for its raw materials "indo-China was a storehouse of raw materials", these consisted of things like iron, coal and rubber. Whereas source C says that its just theirs " it is our country". Source D says that it wants Vietnam for economical reasons but source C says that it wants to "hold on to it" because of its "profound" love for the country, this is very emotional. Source C never mentions anything about giving independence to Vietnam even if it was theirs however source D mention that they would "Our aim was to lead them to independence little by little". ...read more.


Having met Ho Chi Minh the American's knew that he was "pro-ally", on the allied side so they would not let France take Vietnam back after this war. Source I is again like F as it mentions about Ho Chi Minh and the US being friends, it also says that they trained the Viet Minh in guerilla warfare. I know that they are friends because the Americans trained them "we trained these guys good". However the man it was written by (Major Al Thomas) seems a little worried about the fact that the Viet Minh were Communists "I was concerned that maybe this was a leftist (Communist) organization". They were friends otherwise America would not have trained them if they were the enemy. The one line that comes from source J is a direct order from President Roosevelt stating that France will not be allowed back in Vietnam "not to return Indo-China to the French under any circumstances, period!". This means that America are on the side of Vietminh, and this means that Vietnam will have freedom after world war two is over as France will not be allowed to return to Vietnam no matter what. Now I will use my own knowledge to try and explain why America stopped helping the Vietnamese in 1945. In source K, When major Al Thomas returns home he seems confused as to why the Americans have stopped their "war-time policy of helping the Vietnamese". This is because there have been changes. World war two was now over, Germany and Japan had both been defeated, however another war had begun the Cold War. This war was like no other, it was a war in which the west was against Communism. The USSR had taken over Eastern Europe now, and they were seemingly spreading Communism to lots of other countries. America had also had also undergone big change, there was now a new President (Truman). ...read more.


Stalin did everything in his power to stop them. However Stalin failed to do so, then on may 12th 1949 Stalin gave up and stopped the blockade. The arms race had begun as well, this was where America and Russia were having their own competitions being the only two super powers in the world. They each tried to get one over on the other by being able to create the most powerful weapon in the world. When Russia finally made the atom b**b it was more powerful than Americas, then they developed one of even greater destruction. Russia then made the Hydrogen b**b and so did America. One of their main tasks was actually to be able to put a man in space but Russia was the first to do this. Relations between Ho and the US could not get better, as after world war two the US were fighting against Communism. They could not be friends with Vietnam as they were Communists and this is what America was against, they did not like it. If they were to be friends there probably would be no point as there could be no trust between them. Conclusion When looking at the agreement part of things I can see that there was a good relation Between Ho and the US, as after the war America did not want France to get control of Vietnam again, they wanted them to remain free, they wanted this for Ho due to them being friends. Each individual who had written a source had liked Ho, all comments made on him were mostly good some not only liked him but also felt sorry for him and what he and his country had gone through. It was those people back in America who had not met him, like the President and leaders of the American forces who hated him as they did not know what he was like. On the disagreement part of things, there was bad relations, that's why America stopped their policy of helping Vietnam in the war and waged a war against Communism. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our University Degree 1920-1949 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related University Degree 1920-1949 essays

  1. Account for the weaknesses of the First and Second Coalitions against France.

    and when those forces met unexpectedly strong resistance from a fervent and rapidly expanding French defence the assumption that the war would be short was quickly dispelled. The Coalition did achieve significant early victories in 1793 but they proved not be decisive.

  2. Why did the Labour Party win the General Election of 1945?

    Stephen Brooke argues that state intervention was unpopular and the public were against 'the dragooning regimentation and loss of liberty through bureaucratic control.' He also highlights the fact that some 35 per cent of the population in 1945 thought private enterprise was the only way to provide jobs.63 Ralph Miliband

  1. To what extent did the Tsarist and Soviet governments control and influence music in ...

    The sole interviews with people who knew the composer well, with Flora Litvinova and the composer's daughter Galina, contain only anecdotal and unhelpful information. I have therefore found the film completely useless as a source and have not cited it anywhere in the text.

  2. The Rape of Nanking and its effects on Sino-Japanese relations.

    They did not only kill those innocent men, but also women and children, even unborn children, without any reasons; it is said, that more than 300,000 unarmed soldiers and innocent civilians were murdered by Japanese troops during the six-week Nanjing Massacre, but in the internet and in different books occur different numbers as well.

  1. Analyze the factors that gradually influenced the emergence of the Two Nation theory in ...

    They were thrown out of government services and properties confiscated, while the Hindus were given ample chances of progressing economically. William Hunter observes the position of the Muslims in the public services in these words, "All sorts of employments great and small are being gradually snatched away from Mohammadans and bestowed on men of other races particularly the Hindus."

  2. Progress made in education in China from 1900-1997

    This system was good from the students? and China?s perspective since it gave students a broader view of the world ultimately benefited China to catch up with modern society.

  1. The Rape of Nanking and its Aftermath: How a Genocidal Event Shaped Sino-Japanese Relations ...

    had done: ?This hope, however, was swiftly shattered when the People?s Republic of China (PRC), eager to forge an alliance with the Japanese to gain international legitimacy, announced various times that it had forgiven the Japanese??[16] Despite what the Japanese did to the citizens of Nanking, Chinese absolved the war crimes of the Japanese in favor of stronger economic ties.


    5 Dieter Segert, Die Grenzen Osteuropas: 1918, 1945, 1989 ? Drei Versuche im Westen anzukommen (Frankfurt am. Main: Campus, 2002), pp. 29-68. 6 For a solid overview of this period, see Joseph Rothschild, East-Central Europe between the Two World Wars (Seattle: Washington University Press, 1974).

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work