• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Depictions of the Boston Massacre 1770. Though the newspaper article and the engraving had similar overall intentions in their construction, these two images of the Massacre differ in their relation of the actual course of events and in their visual impre

Extracts from this document...


Chelsea Greenlee 293: Sophomore Colloquium 1 July 2011 Images of the Boston Massacre As the bells of the Old Brick, Brattle Street, and Old South churches sounded throughout the town, hundreds of citizens gathered in the streets of Boston, Massachusetts, on the evening of March 5, 1770. The ringing of the church bells gathered the outpouring citizens around the sentry post outside the customhouse on King Street. There, a group of youths were taunting a British sentry named Private Hugh White, pelting him with snowballs and other small items.1 The assaults against Private White, and later against the seven relief soldiers led by Captain Thomas Preston, became increasingly violent as the crowd augmented and joined in the agitation.2 The mob of citizens dared the soldiers to fire on them.3 Private Hugh Montgomery, whose musket was struck by a snowball, stumbled backwards, surprised, and discharged his weapon into the crowd. After a confused pause, the remaining soldiers fired. 4 Five Bostonian men, including a mixed-race sailor named Crispus Attucks, died, and six more citizens were injured. This event, termed "The Boston Massacre" by colonial Patriots, was the worst and most publicized of many violent interactions between Boston citizens and British soldiers following the enactment of the Townshend Acts beginning in 1767, which aimed to forcefully exert British power over the colonies, both politically and economically.5 News of the incident spread quickly throughout the British colonies and to Great Britain. ...read more.


course of events, the crowd of townspeople outside the customhouse on King Street the night of March 5, 1770, was mob-like and violent. The incident of the shooting was more a case of miscommunication and confused, accidental action than one of malicious intent. Rather than as a violent mob, this section of the article portrays the townspeople almost as petulant children, who, after being pushed and prodded by the British troops, angrily began throwing snowballs. The reaction of the British soldiers was, therefore, both excessively hostile and unwarranted. Captain Preston, who is portrayed in the article as overtly malicious in his attitude towards the crowd, was in actuality attempting to disburse the angry Bostonians, placing himself in front of the loaded British muskets.14 Likewise, the angry order given to the British troops to fire on the crowd did not come from Preston, if it occurred at all, but rather was most likely a misunderstood taunt from a rowdy Bostonian within the mob.15 Both Captain Preston and Private Hugh Montgomery, who was the first to fire into the crowd, were struck with a cudgel before the first shot was fired, despite the article's description, and the blows themselves were not the cause of the shootings.16 A silversmith and ardent Bostonian Patriot, Paul Revere cut an engraving that portrayed the climax of the Boston Massacre, specifically of the shootings outside the customhouse on King Street, which was released on March 26, 1770.1718 The engraving, which was ...read more.


chaotic scene, and the image evoked by the engraving, in which the soldiers are acting as a firing squad, killing innocents indiscriminately, differ in both their descriptions of the event and the visual impressions given to the audience. Despite the dissimilarities between the two pieces of propaganda, both the Gazette article and Paul Revere's engraving demonstrate the way news travelled in the years leading up to the American Revolution, and both played an important role in spreading anti-British sentiment throughout the colonies using exaggeration and inflammatory details. 21 1Richard Archer, As If an Enemy's Country: the British Occupation of Boston and the Origins of Revolution (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010), 189. 2 Ibid., 190. 3 David A. Copeland, Debating the Issues in Colonial Newspapers (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 2000), 248. 4 Archer, 193. 5 Ibid., 67-68. 6 Hiller B. Zobel, The Boston Massacre (New York: W.W. Norton, 1970), 67. 7 Copeland, 248. 8 Archer, 181. 9 Copeland, 249. 11 Ibid., 251-252. 12 Ibid., 251. 13 Ibid., 252. 14 Zobel, 198. 15 Archer, 193. 16 Ibid. 17 James Giblin, The Many Rides of Paul Revere (New York: Scholastic, 2007), 20. 18 "The Boston Massacre: A Behind-the-Scenes Look At Paul Revere's Most Famous Engraving," Library of Congress, accessed Feb. 20, 2011, http://www.teachamericanhistory.org/File/Boston_Massacre_A_Look_at_Paul_Revere_s_Engraving.pdf. 19 "The Boston Massacre: A Behind-the-Scenes Look At Paul Revere's Most Famous Engraving." 20 Giblin, 20. 21 "The Boston Massacre: A Behind-the-Scenes Look At Paul Revere's Most Famous Engraving." ?? ?? ?? ?? 1 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our University Degree 1700-1799 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related University Degree 1700-1799 essays

  1. Although the American Civil War started after the Confederate States seceded from the Union ...

    The revisionist argument on whether Slavery is solely to blame for the Civil War also dismissed the view that the war was a sectional conflict. Revisionist historians like James G. Randall and Avery Craven argued that the United States was actually more united than divided as is often pointed out.

  2. Define the changing relationship between masters and slaves in the antebellum South

    While becoming psychologically dependent on the masters during this period, blacks were simultaneously becoming more harmonious in their secret fight for emancipation. The Industrial Revolution in the early nineteenth century had an enormous impact on the relationship between masters and their slaves.

  1. The Bolsheviks did not seize power in October 1917, it fell into their hands

    There was no way back now, as his own fate hung inexorably with his army's. Lenin was delighted that Russia was at war. As with Peter Durnovo, he foresaw the long intolerable strain that would be too much for Russia's financial resources to deal with.

  2. The topic that colonial governor of Connecticut Thomas Fitch (1700-1774) wrote about in 1764

    Fitch finds the taxation of the colonies to be wrong, and he is consistent with his disapproval of it. His disapproval branches from the first page of his document in a Law known well throughout England and the colonies she owned, By the Common Law of England, every commoner hath

  1. In which ways did the industrial revolution change Britain and the British State and ...

    This would have been predominantly egalitarian to begin with, but would eventually have become a more isolated practice with boundary posts and fences being erected as a way of identifying territory as much as anything else.

  2. "On fait de la politique pour des raisons personnelles, mais en faisant de la ...

    Mon action me rend aboulique � l'�gard de tout ce qui n'est pas elle, � commencer par ses r�sultats. Si je me suis li� si facilement � la R�volution, c'est que ses r�sultats sont lointains et toujours en changement. Au fond, je suis un jouer.

  1. Marxism versus Sectarianism - "The dogs bark: therefore the caravan is moving." (Arab proverb) ...

    From a reading of comrade Oviedo's article nobody can learn anything about the position of Socialist Appeal, El Militante, or anything else. Then what was the point of writing it? Mythology instead of argument The article by Luis Oviedo contains so many mistakes and misrepresentations that it would require a book to answer them.

  2. The Philosophes aimed to disenchant the World. Discuss

    guilds, sovereign legal bodies and aristocratic representative institutions and legal jurisdiction over their tenants.[24] Therefore, one can see how a more tangible

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work