• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Describe several heuristics that you might use when deciding whether you should a) Study especially hard for an exam OR b) ask someone for (or accept) a date.Under what circumstances are these heuristics likely to contribute to poor decision making?

Extracts from this document...


Describe several heuristics that you might use when deciding whether you should a)Study especially hard for an exam OR b)ask someone for (or accept) a date. Under what circumstances are these heuristics likely to contribute to poor decision making? Every day throughout our lives a decision will have to be made. The magnitude of this decision will quite obviously vary from choice to choice, but the principle remains. Whether we are deciding to walk a certain direction, or turn off the light, or even if we are deciding to attempt world domination a choice has to be made. With these choices comes indecision. There is no formula to work out how people are going to react to certain situations, so essentially any choice is a stab in the dark. These choices may be well informed, but as Benjamin Franklin said in 1789; "nothing in life is sure except death and taxes." Heuristics are a trial-and-error type method of helping to decide which decision to make. Human decision making often portrays a theory of bounded rationality. This means that human thinking may seem rational, but isn't, for a number of reasons. There are too many variables to calculate. Often, also, we are provided with information which is not complete. ...read more.


This is where the misconception would be, because the next girl is not part of his sample size, she is part of the woman population as a whole. The availability heuristic differs in that you would base your decision on the ease at which you could bring similar circumstances to mind. For example if you were playing basketball and thought about attempting a shot from far out, you would recall how often that shot had been made. The instances do not necessarily have to be from personal past experiences, they could also be the frequency that you had seen someone else make that shot. If one of your team mates had made the shot many times, then you may start to believe that you could also make that shot. This retrievability of instances can also be applied to asking someone out on a date. If you knew the person that you were asking out and knew a small history about other times they had been asked out, you could gage your decision on that information. If you knew that they had been asked out a great number of times but had the inclination to turn down all the offers that had been proposed this may deter you from asking that person out. ...read more.


When dealing with people it is next to impossible to come up with accurate statistical information. The likelihood of somebody actually working out percentage chances of being accepted is next to none. Given this a decision would have to be made between representative heuristic and availability heuristic. Each has its pitfalls and advantages. As asking someone on a date is a very personal thing, it would probably be a wiser choice to base your expectations on personal experience using representative heuristics. This could succeed in certain situations, but there are also situation with which it could be unsuccessful. All human beings differ in great ways, and personality is one of them. Perhaps the person you are asking out is extremely cynical, or your own personality is over confident. All these factors go into whether or not you almost rational decision would be successful. Rational decision always have been, and will continue to be used by humans the world over. Often they result in success, and often they do not. Perhaps some people are more rational than others, but this will not increase their likelihood of success. To reiterate the Benjamin Franklin quote : "nothing in life is sure except death and taxes". So with this in mind perhaps it is better to put that rational decision making aside and just take a risk. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our University Degree Miscellaneous section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related University Degree Miscellaneous essays

  1. Source and Form Criticism of the Bible. Both types of criticisms are helpful ...

    As Form criticism reviews the languages used and the types of genres displayed, it outlines a structure for the passage, in Gen 12:6 and 13:7 suggests that the "Torah" must have been written after Moses, at a time when the Canaanites no longer possessed that land.

  2. Describe the visit in the Quaker Meeting House and assess the relevance of visiting ...

    Quakers they were seeking "a direct experience with God". Keith introduced the main principles being peace, truth and integrity and where one's word is absolute. Keith used an example that a Quaker does not swear on the bible in court, his word being his truth. He also discussed that Quakers would refer to God being within them rather than believing in God.

  1. Jesus appointed only men to succeed him therefore women should be excluded from priesthood'.

    During a part of his ministry Jesus was accompanied by a group of women: Mark 15: '40Some women were watching from a distance. Among them were Mary Magdalene, Mary the mother of James the younger and of Joses, and Salome.

  2. What conclusions does More want his 16th century readers to draw about the Christian ...

    Which, then, is the true Christian? The Utopian religious governance is therefore presented as far more morally upright than the corresponding authority of the European Christian pre-reformation church, and More levies quite a fair charge against the latter. Again, though there is no actual Christian religion as such, in that

  1. Compare and contrast the human condition as it relates to Muslims and Christians. ...

    Look as an example of the enormous support for Muslims by Christians after the Tsunami. The author is a member of an ELCA Lutheran Church and as part of the mission of this Church; the congregation took a mission trip in part to support a Catholic Orphanage in Peru.

  2. Abortion: A Woman's Choice.

    Their assault on abortion was motivated not by concern for the health of the woman but, they claimed, for the welfare of the fetus. You had to be a physician to know when abortion was morally justified, because the question depended on scientific and medical facts understood only by physicians.

  1. This paper will examine the perspectives of both sides; outsider and insider, and will ...

    There are also a variety of quotations in this article from various leaders and auditors within the Scientology religion that give different numbers in membership, ranging from one million to ten million worldwide3. The creator of the Church of Scientology is criticized by Watcher because of his claim that he is a medical doctor.

  2. 'Few Historians think no progress is being made towards truth, but even history's keenest ...

    Truth therefore has become nothing more than a linguistic concept with a meaning like all other words. Truth, as a word, is not able to access the reality of the world. We like to think that we can know the truth because it protects us from what Jenkins calls 'a fear of disorder'.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work