• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Discuss the contributing factors and progress of the fall of the Roman Republic

Extracts from this document...


Discuss the contributing factors and progress of the fall of the Roman Republic. The Roman Republic embraced concepts greater than simply political institutions, forming a way of life that included ideals such as duty and restraint that were in a sense as if not more essential than the actually governmental process. The Republican government was complex with the main elements being the Republic's chief officials (magistrates) who were called Consuls, the aristocratic peers in the Senate and the popular ensembles. This complexity rather than enabling the Republic to adapt to new situations actually caused it's evolution to be held back due to petty internal frictions between it's own separate groups. For example, when the "struggle of the orders" took place due to personal ambitions instead of balancing power between the patricians and the plebeians it actually created a new upper class even more jealous of it's privileges than the first. Yet it is how these frictions came about and how traditional and essential values were lost that really answer the question of why the Republic failed to adapt and finally collapsed. The main contributing factor to the collapse of the Roman Republic to most was its own expansion out of the confines of Italy caused by a series of foreign wars with kingdoms such as Carthage, Mainland Greece, Hellenistic and Asia Minor which acquired new territories for Rome. One example is that the government gave responsibility of these provinces to senators, giving the consuls and praetors extended terms of office, by one year, making them pro-consuls and pro-praetors. ...read more.


Gaius Marius, a consul in 107Bc and from 104-100Bc, finally abolished the long-standing, traditional law that required men to own land before they could serve in the army. The law was originally thought to bring the assurance of loyalty in armies so naturally many traditionalists were shocked by this move, yet it did ease the "military crisis" in one sense. Unfortunately for the Republic this did not end the crisis in all senses, instead what is now known, as the "vicious nexus" became apparent. The stability of the men returning to their farms was lost meaning that the campaign had to be a profitable one to ensure that the discharge payments, usually in the form of land, could be met. As the Republic had not made automatic provisions for its men the armies and commanders were thrown together in mutual dependency, with the men wishing for help and support from their commander and the commander hoping that their gratitude would further his own political ambitions. Campaigns had to be profitable to ensure this balance was kept, an extremely difficult request or the commanders who we must remember were not professional but climbing the political ladder. The "vicious nexus" in truth pushed the Senate's needs into a secondary position. It may be because of this pressure and personal ambition, both not being controlled by the Republic that caused many generals to blackmail the Republic with the threat of civil war: Cornelius Sulla in 88 and 82BC; Pompey and Crassus in 71BC; Pompey, Crassus and Caesar in 60BC; Caesar in 49BC; and Octavian in 43BC. ...read more.


Like all the rest of the manoeuvres the Senate's "champion" was out-stratisized and brutally beaten by 48BC. For four years Caesar controlled the state until he was murdered for setting himself up as a "king" over the Republic, but also took make way for new ambition. The Republic represented so many ideals and institutions which as well as making it a wide and all embracing concept it also made it frustratingly intangible and it may be out of aggravation at not being able to come to grips with it that Caesar called it a "mere name without form or substance". In truth Caesar knew it's power was in the minds of the population as even though he was able to force his way through the laws and systems he was killed for being a risk to the foundation of the Republic. We admire how the Republic grew from a small collection of settlers to become a huge Empire yet in truth it was this expansion that undid the governmental system, leading to the forth stage of Rome - the Emperors. The old ways and systems could not control the new situations and people and rather than change the Roman's relied, sentimentally almost, on policies that did not support or protect the Republic. Ambitions, the "military crisis," civil wars, new ideals, the decline in pietas and people actively undermining the government's authoritas weakened the Republic greatly and led to many great lives being lost. What was the greatest problem was that the Republic's politics were so weak that they needed supervision and a suitable form could not be found: a stronger hand than Sulla was needed but not as publicallly feared and hated as Caesar. ?? ?? ?? ?? 1 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our University Degree Ancient History section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related University Degree Ancient History essays

  1. The Romans and their invasion of Britian

    There was also enjoyment in many forms of exercise, including running, javelin throwing, and wrestling. For these activities there were special grounds like the Campus Martius in Rome. There was also space for the less energetic activities including drafts, capita et navia (Roman equivalent of head and tails), tali (knucklebones), and fishing.

  2. Was the Fall of the Roman Republic inevitable?

    he proposed a land reform, although some contemporaries would attribute this reform to Gracchus's want for popularity or pressure from his influential backers. As we know, the senate consisted of the wealthiest men in Rome whom this would affect severely, knowing this; Gracchus used the power of the Consilium Plebis to bypass the senate.

  1. With reference to the Res Gestae and Suetonius' Life of Augustus, to what extent ...

    Augustus' potestas, or legal powers, clarified his role and legitimised his pre-existing dominance, but Augustus never intended for them to provide an exhaustive description of his role or to limit his powers. Instead, Augustus hoped that, with success and popularity, he would evolve into a monarchical figure acceptable to the

  2. Alexander the Great and His Army.

    "Should there be an ingredient which affirms his genius, it is the startling rapidity with which he always acted: no situation caused him to pause; all difficulties were immediately stormed; though risks were immense, to him success seemed foreordained."22 The hold Alexander had over his troops defies comparison.

  1. It is clear that Alexander set out to create a unified empire including Greeks ...

    After Alexander's died in 323 B.C., the inhabitants abandoned most of his new foundations for their homeland or another city. The fact that the majority of cities founded by Alexander dissolved shortly after his death is evidence that Alexander devoted little time and resources towards city building and development.

  2. What was the role of the Roman Army in Imperial Politics? KB2010

    Furthermore they did interfere in politics with instants such as the proclaiming of Claudius following Caligula's death (Campbell, B, 2002, 114). What is interesting is that it was after Claudius had promised large gifts to the Guard. Once again it can be seen that interference came at the promise of a reward.

  1. Peloponnesian Politics: What can the events between the First Macedonian War and the Achaean ...

    thus was in a position to march against Critolaus to check the Achaeans (Gruen 1976: 65). Critolaus fled and was then defeated by Metellus at Locris. Metellus offered terms of peace in the spring and autumn of 146 but they were rejected both times by the Achaeans (Gruen 1976: 67).

  2. Can the term Romanisation describe the cultural and political processes that took place in ...

    that Athens produced after 42 BC and those that followed were not denominationally Roman (Kroll 1997: 144). For example, coins minted for Marc Antony only made passing references to him by way of incorporating features of him into the head of Dionysos ((much like the way Hellenistic Diadochi portrayed themselves as Alexander the Great)

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work