• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Examples of how fallacies can be used in argumentative writing.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Ricky C. Camus / BSAT3-2 January 30, 2012 Fallacy Examples from newspaper clips and magazines, book passages. Appeal to Misleading Authority The only policy that effectively reduces public shootings is right-to-carry laws. Allowing citizens to carry concealed handguns reduces violent crime. In the 31 states that have passed right-to-carry laws since the mid-1980s, the number of multiple-victim public shootings and other violent crimes has dropped dramatically. Murders fell by 7.65%, rapes by 5.2%, aggravated assaults by 7%, and robberies by 3%. Explanation: These examples are the use of misleadingly precise numbers, specifically, "7.65%" and "5.2%" in the anti-gun control example. Especially in social science studies, percentage precision to the second decimal place is meaningless, since it is well within the margin of error on such measurements. It is a typical tactic of pseudo-scientific argumentation to use overly-precise numbers in an attempt to impress and intimidate the audience. Source: "Fact Card", Handgun Control, Inc. Complex Question "How am I to get in?" asked Alice again, in a louder tone. "Are you to get in at all?" said the Footman, "That's the first question, you know." Explanation: A question with a false, disputed, or question-begging presupposition. Source: Lewis Carroll, Alice's Adventures in Wonderland, Ch. 6. Argumentum ad Hominem Osama Bin Laden: ...At the time that they condemn any Muslim who calls for his right, they receive the highest top official of the Irish Republican Army at the White House as a political leader, while woe, all woe is the Muslims if they cry out for their rights. Wherever we look, we find the US as the leader of terrorism and crime in the world. The US does not consider it a terrorist act to throw atomic bombs at nations thousands of miles away, when it would not be possible for those bombs to hit military troops only. These bombs were rather thrown at entire nations, including women, children and elderly people and up to this day the traces of those bombs remain in Japan. ...read more.

Middle

Source: Basil Cottle, The Plight of English: Ambiguities, Cacophonies and Other Violations of Our Language (Arlington House, 1975), pp. 33-34. Red Herring The most telling moment in last night's [State of the Union] speech came after the president noted that "key provisions of the Patriot Act are set to expire next year." In response, notes the New York Times, "some critics in Congress applauded enthusiastically." If Osama bin Laden watched the speech, one imagines him applauding too. Explanation: That Osama bin Laden might approve of the expiration of provisions of the Patriot Act does not show that American critics are wrong to also approve, since the reasons for their approval are different. Some Americans oppose parts of the Patriot Act because they believe that it infringes upon the rights of Americans without significantly helping to prevent terrorism. They may be wrong, but that doesn't make them an al Qaeda cheering squad. Source: James Taranto, "The al Qaeda Cheering Section", Best of the Web Today, 1/21/2004 False Precision Implausibly precise statistics...are often bogus. Consider a precise number that is well known to generations of parents and doctors: the normal human body temperature of 98.6 degrees Fahrenheit. Recent investigations involving millions of measurements have revealed that this number is wrong; normal human body temperature is actually 98.2 degrees Fahrenheit. The fault, however, lies not with Dr. Wunderlich's original measurements-they were averaged and sensibly rounded to the nearest degree: 37 degrees Celsius. When this temperature was converted to Fahrenheit, however, the rounding was forgotten, and 98.6 was taken to be accurate to the nearest tenth of a degree. Had the original interval between 36.5 degrees Celsius and 37.5 degrees Celsius been translated, the equivalent Fahrenheit temperatures would have ranged from 97.7 degrees to 99.5 degrees. Explanation: Occurs when numerical data are presented in a manner that implies better precision than is actually the case; since precision is a limit to accuracy, Source: John Allen Paulos, A Mathematician Reads the Newspaper (Anchor, 1995), p. ...read more.

Conclusion

Jones is responsible for the rise in crime." The increase in taxes might or might not be one factor in the rising crime rates, but the argument hasn't shown us that one caused the other. Explanation: To avoid the post hoc fallacy, the arguer would need to give us some explanation of the process by which the tax increase is supposed to have produced higher crime rates. And that's what you should do to avoid committing this fallacy: If you say that A causes B, you should have something more to say about how A caused B than just that A came first and B came later. Slippery slope "Animal experimentation reduces our respect for life. If we don't respect life, we are likely to be more and more tolerant of violent acts like war and murder. Soon our society will become a battlefield in which everyone constantly fears for their lives. It will be the end of civilization. To prevent this terrible consequence, we should make animal experimentation illegal right now." Since animal experimentation has been legal for some time and civilization has not yet ended, it seems particularly clear that this chain of events won't necessarily take place. Even if we believe that experimenting on animals reduces respect for life, and loss of respect for life makes us more tolerant of violence, that may be the spot on the hillside at which things stop-we may not slide all the way down to the end of civilization. And so we have not yet been given sufficient reason to accept the arguer's conclusion that we must make animal experimentation illegal right now. Explanation: Like post hoc, slippery slope can be a tricky fallacy to identify, since sometimes a chain of events really can be predicted to follow from a certain action. Here's an example that doesn't seem fallacious: "If I fail English 101, I won't be able to graduate. If I don't graduate, I probably won't be able to get a good job, and I may very well end up doing temp work or flipping burgers for the next year." ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our University Degree Philosophy and Theology section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related University Degree Philosophy and Theology essays

  1. In this essay I will be explaining the just war theory which gives the ...

    As Michael Walzer said "We have extended the notion beyond the realm of these kinds of attacks across personal or state boundaries to include the notion of a humanitarian intervention. If somebody had gone into Rwanda to stop the massacre; that would have been a just war".10 Therefore it appears

  2. Kant's Philosophy

    Hoping to achieve some particular end, no matter how beneficial it may seem, is not purely and unconditionally good. It is not the effect or even the intended effect that bestows moral character on an action. All intended effects "could be brought about through other causes and would not require

  1. Zionism has never seriously posed this question: Why, during these two thousand years, have ...

    Some even called upon the Jewish public to take a messianic initiative: to begin a gradual process of immigration to an agricultural settlement in the land of Israel, as a necessary and organic step towards full redemption. They also tried to developede practical programs, some quite far reaching for furthering this enterprise.

  2. Outline your interpretation of Camus' views on absurdity. Do you agree with him?

    One of Camus' greatest contradictions is that by defining life as absurd and meaningless, this provides some meaning. Camus questions whether it is possible to live "without appeal", which I take to mean without appealing to external values which help make the meaningless, meaningful.13 Appealing to God is probably the

  1. Questioning Abortion. Marquis's argument gives us the view that we lack when looking ...

    Suppose an adult goes into a coma. It would be safe to safe to claim that there is a lack of sentient while the adult is in coma. Also suppose that, in this coma, there are very high chances of coming out with a full recovery. Would it then be morally permissible to deprive the adult of

  2. Parsons as Material Beings

    Whatever the credentials of the claim that material beings of distinct kinds may coincide is with respect to material objects in general such as statues and lumps of clay, there is what I take to be a conclusive objection to the view when it comes to persons.

  1. It has sometimes been remarked how much has been written, both by friends and ...

    the sincerity, courage and self-devotion which enabled them to do so, were themselves the fruits of early impressions. The power of education is almost boundless: there is not one natural inclination which it is not strong enough to coerce, and, if needful, to destroy by disuse.

  2. 'Hospitality is generosity, unconditional love in action, rooted in Jesus' words and examples

    Look after him and when I return, I will reimburse you for any extra expense you may have.'(10:35) This demonstrates the ongoing charity that the Samaritan exudes, showing that there are no limits to how much he will assist his neighbor. As the commandment says, 'Love your neighbor as yourself'(10:27).

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work