• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

'Few Historians think no progress is being made towards truth, but even history's keenest devotees know objectivity is unattainable' (Lowenthal) Discuss.

Extracts from this document...


'Few Historians think no progress is being made towards truth, but even history's keenest devotee's know objectivity is unattainable' (Lowenthal) Discuss. Alex Eisenberg V11101 Learning History Dr Karen Adler School of History 'Few Historians think no progress is being made towards truth, but even history's keenest devotees know objectivity is unattainable' (Lowenthal) Discuss. The ultimate conclusion for an historian is to conclude that he or she has found the truth. This however is an unattainable goal. No historian will ever be able to find what was the real truth because we cannot know the reality of the past. Two reasons help us explain this, firstly, because the past has gone we are unable verify any claim that we make, therefore we cannot be sure what the 'truth' is. Secondly, whatever evidence the historian cannot be using is not objective. It has been created by other humans who are subject to the same fallibility that the modern day historian is also subject to. Lowenthal's statement recognises these two ideas but also present is the idea that the historian is 'progressing' towards the truth. The idea of 'progress' simply suggests that historians are moving towards 'truth'. In order to understand this we have to realise that 'history is less than the past because only a tiny fraction of events have been noted...'1, so to know the truth we, at the very least, have to have all the evidence at hand. Given the fact that this is impossible all historians can do is try to 'progress towards the truth', despite never actually getting there. ...read more.


It questions and tries to explain how we know anything. History is related to philosophy in terms of what is it possible to know about the past. This is a problem because if it is difficult to know about something that exists, it is going to be even more difficult to say something about the past -something that does not exist. This sort of 'knowledge is therefore likely to be tentative'5, and manufactured by historians who will be operating within a particular social and cultural framework (amongst many other things). Therefore historians who are trying to gain access to the 'real past' or the 'truth' are mistaken because they can never get there. For historians such as Elton, there is doubt to the fact that we cannot know anything. This is what furthers his efforts to try and attain the truth but they are clearly in vain. Because, as Lowenthal exhibits in the quotation, we cannot achieve objectivity because the historian is always subject to his or her own presuppositions and pressures. If we admit that we cannot really know what happened then we have to question how specific histories were shaped. We have to take into account epistemology because it informs everything that we do. Jenkins explains how unlike direct memory, which is itself doubtful, history relies on the eyes, ears and voice of somebody else. Therefore we cannot be sure about anything that we use as evidence. Lowenthal makes the point that this is not detrimental to history because in practice the historian has to adhere to quite a specific methodology where the reader has access to the sources used. ...read more.


It would be impossible to know for sure which method would aid the search for the truth the most. There is no denying that the methods would be coherent but the fact remains that because of the limitations upon them we would not actually be progressing in our study of history. But instead we would be creating a history that is moving further away from what the truth may have been. Historians cannot be objective in their study of history, they are subject to a whole host of constraints and limitations that make written history particularly subjective. However this is not necessarily a problem. There needs to be a recognition that historians are working under limitations instead of the traditionalist viewpoint. The methodologies of Elton, Marwick, Carr and many other historians, that try to suggest that they can eliminate all the presuppositions and ideological ideas that may be present in the historian, cannot work. This is because at every juncture we are inextricably linked to social, political and cultural constraints. Therefore Lowenthal's claim represents a broad spectrum of opinion. By using the word 'progressing' in terms of moving towards some truth, he accepts the fact that we have not yet reached it (and that we never will) but he also is making a comment on the nature of history. That without the debate and the interpretation we would not be progressing at all. Whilst truth is the nirvana of history, if we found the truth there would be no more searching. History is about postmodern historiography, a framework where interpretation is vital and where there is recognition that objectivity and truth are unattainable. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our University Degree Miscellaneous section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related University Degree Miscellaneous essays

  1. Describe several heuristics that you might use when deciding whether you should a) Study ...

    His sample size however is only the females he has tried it on, so even if the next girl were to turn him down that would still be a 75% success rate.

  2. Source and Form Criticism of the Bible. Both types of criticisms are helpful ...

    Thus in the New Testament Jesus spoke of the "law of Moses" when referring to Lev 12:3 (John 7:23), and Jesus cited "the book of Moses" when he quoted Exod 3:6 (Mark 12:26). From then on, it was official Church doctrine that Moses wrote the first five books of the Torah.

  1. Exegesis on Job 42:1-17 In the passage of Job 42:1-6 there appears to ...

    being but dust and ashes", or "I yield, and am comforted, being but dust and ashes". Job is therefore not sorry for confronting God. Instead he seems to be accepting that God will never give him what he wants: an apology.

  2. Describe the visit in the Quaker Meeting House and assess the relevance of visiting ...

    The fact that they all have different opinions of God, some actually not believing shows tolerance, imagination, balance and a willingness to learn from others. The fact that there was no religious objects or decoration in the Quaker house showing no preference for belief systems attached to any religions, letting every one feel at home.

  1. Jesus appointed only men to succeed him therefore women should be excluded from priesthood'.

    If a husband divorced his wife, he had every right to claim their children as well. As we can see from the above, women were considered second-class citizens, akin to slaves. The fact that they are mentioned as enthusiastic followers of Jesus is, in fact unusual.

  2. What conclusions does More want his 16th century readers to draw about the Christian ...

    there is no uniform following of the scriptures, elements of Christianity definitely exist - leading a life of virtue to be rewarded after death, for example. This could be said to be the essence of Christianity without all of the religious paraphernalia.

  1. What makes the martyr?

    In 1661 a martyr was defined as a person who chooses to suffer death rather than renounce faith in Christ or obedience to his teachings. This definition was formerly applied to Charles I by those members of the Anglican Church who regarded his execution in 1649 as an act of religious persecution.

  2. Abortion: A Woman's Choice.

    At the same time, women were effectively excluded from the medical schools, where such arcane knowledge could be acquired. So, as things worked out, women had almost nothing to say about terminating their own pregnancies. Which brings us to a key debate in the abortion issue: exactly who shall be

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work