How far do these sources support the idea that Germany was warlike and aggressive in its foreign policy in the years 1899-1914?

Authors Avatar

Yousuf Al Hashmi

 How far do these sources support the idea that Germany was warlike and aggressive in its foreign policy in the years 1899-1914?

This essay will answer the question by referring to the given sources. Its conclusion is that there are six sources split up into four opinions. The sources fully support the question, the sources support the second half of the question, the sources don’t support the question and the sources aren’t pertinent to answering the question.

Source one fully supports the idea that Germany was warlike and aggressive. Chancellor Bulow stated at the end of the 19th century that “the German nation will be either the hammer of the anvil.” This suggests that his aspiration for Germany was to adopt a warlike and aggressive foreign policy. Bulow remarked that “without a strong army…Navy, there will be no welfare.” This leads us to believe that his tone was very warlike and aggressive. This source is useful because Bulow had the power to direct government foreign policies at the time.

Join now!

Sources two and three support the idea that Germany was only aggressive not warlike. Source two suggests that Bertie felt that Germany was more aggressive than warlike due to the situations she (Germany) was kept in. He stated in his secret memorandum that, “She wanted the sea board of Holland”. This implies that Germany was an aggressive dealer which might have caused a lot trouble for Germany. It states that Germany was best served by keeping Britain/France/Russia arguing, because it had no other option. Source three, a response to an earlier memorandum by Crowe states that Germany had an ...

This is a preview of the whole essay