• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

How far was the English civil war a result of rule over multiple kingdoms?

Extracts from this document...


´╗┐Elliot GreenAmanda FlatherHR 111 How far was the English Civil War a consequence of rule over multiple kingdoms? ?If the Remonstrance had been rejected I would have sold all I had the next morning and never have seen England more, and I know there are many other modest men of the same resolution?[1]. England, 1641, and the Grand Remonstrance has just been passed. The long list of grievances towards the present monarch, King Charles I included such issues like the ?catholic conspiracy?, local land distributions, right for parliament to bypass the Crowns decisions if necessary and other general foreign, legal and financial policies. The quote from Oliver Cromwell, a puritan member of parliament during the run up to the Civil war, effectively spelt out the mass sentiment towards the monarchy at the time, that being the large dissatisfaction with Charles I?s tyrannical rule over England. Although Cromwell does indeed speak for the majority when he expresses relief over the ratification of the remonstrance, the causes of the English Civil war do undeniably stem from issues outside of the English domain. It must be stressed that rule over multiple kingdoms was indeed an element that was encompassed into the general causes of the Civil War and it can be argued that the Crowns rule in Scotland and Ireland did indeed make conflict inevitable but varying other factors do also need to be considered. Charles I installation of ?High Anglicanism? and his decision to marry a Catholic fed into the grievances that protestant England had towards the Crown. ...read more.


However, this view is too simplistic. Yes it is true that as long as influence was to be maintained in Scotland and Ireland, money was needed to create armies in these regions and as long as this was apparent, confrontations between the Crown and parliament were bound to occur in England. However, it was not the rule over multiple kingdoms alone that contributed towards Civil War. Instead, factors such as the lack of a stable system of bureaucratic taxation and oppressive personality of Charles I did indeed feed into the grievances that led to Civil War. Further still one might even argue that the economic environment presented to both James I and Charles I following Elizabeth I’s reign was one less than favourable stability owing to the: “debts of at least £400,000 at her death”[12]. One might also argue that without religious intervention and the lack of stable taxation there might never have been risings in either Scotland or Ireland. Another factor that potentially led to the English Civil war was the supposed ‘personal rule’ or ‘eleven years tyranny’ of Charles I[13]. We have seen previously in this essay that Charles I personality did indeed contribute to the conflicts in Ireland and Scotland due to his installation Anglicanism in both kingdoms but it was not him alone that led to the Civil war but rather the crippling financial burdens of rule over multiple kingdoms that also contributed. This section will focus mainly on Charles’ political tyranny within England and the reasons why this led to national and local grievances. ...read more.


In both cases, religious conformity was of the highest importance owing to its alleged effect of creating stability. The anti-Catholic expedition in Ireland and pro-Anglicisation in Scotland was met with huge objection and England had neither the money nor the physical resources to upkeep their influence in these regions. It was as a result of this consistent demand for finances to build an army that created the largest causes of the war. ________________ [1] Oliver Cromwell in Edward Hyde?s?, Earl of Clarendon, A history of the rebellion, (1702-1704), p.21 [2] Conrad Russell, The Origins of the English Civil War, (London, 1973), p.12 [3] Ann Hughes, The Causes of the English Civil War, (London, 1991), p.38 [4] Ibid p.43 [5] T.P.S. Woods, Prelude to Civil war 1642, (Salisbury, 1980), p.2 [6] John Kenyon, The Civil Wars of England, (London, 1988), p.13 [7] Ann Hughes, The Causes of the English Civil war, (London, 1991), p.163 [8] Conrad Russell, The Origins of the English Civil War, (London, 1973), p.12 [9] Ibid p.13 [10] Ann Hughes, The Causes of the English Civil War, (London, 1991), p.53 [11] Ibid p.13 [12] Ann Hughes, The Causes of the English Civil War, (London, 1991), p.27 [13] Michael B. Young, Charles I, (Basingstoke, 1997), p.73 [14] Ibid p.81 [15] Ibid p.76 [16] Brian Manning, The English people and the English revolution 1640-1649, (London, 1976), p.184 [17] Brian Manning, The English people and the English revolution 1640-1649, (London, 1976), p.107 [18] Michael B. Young, Charles I, (Basingstoke, 1997), p.113 [19] Conrad Russell, The Origins of the English Civil War, (London, 1973), p.161 [20] Ibid p.144 [21] Ibid p.167 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our University Degree 1600-1699 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related University Degree 1600-1699 essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    'Repressive and emotionally cold'. Is this a true reflection of relations between parents and ...

    4 star(s)

    sent their infants away to be wet nursed in the countryside, was that it was often believed to be healthier for the infant, an alternative to crowded unsanitary living conditions. There was also other reasons such as pain or discomfort caused by breastfeeding that could often result in a woman

  2. The Dutch trade during the Anglo- Dutch wars. The Anglo-Dutch wars were instigated ...

    this invasion was stopped by the French-Batavian army.19 Meanwhile in 1791 the West Indian Company was repealed, and in 1798 the East Indian Company suffered the same faith. The West and East Indian Companies were the companies which owned all the trading fleets that traveled to the Americas and the Easter colonies such as Java.

  1. Why was Richelieu's foreign policy so politically divisive from 1624-42?

    forces once again entered Savoy and captured Pinerolo in February 1630.16 Although a welcome addition to Richelieu's plan, the successful capture of Pinerolo caused significant political division in France. In late 1629, the French court was divided over the lack of money available for a second intervention in Mantua.

  2. Why had the policies of Charles I and his ministers aroused so much opposition ...

    This perception that religious conformity was to be force-fed was not accepted and strengthened opposition greatly, as well as the growing paranoia of a "Popish Plot". England, having spent almost half a century under clear protestant rule, faced what was seen as a sneaky transition to an alignment with Rome.

  1. Why, and with what consequences did Charles I fail to defeat the Covenanters in ...

    Fissel states that 'the Short Parliament made Charles's predicament in 1640 much worse than in 1639 as elections raised political consciousness throughout the Kingdom'.[10] This is true to a large extent. Rather than voting to provide subsidies for the King's campaign against the Covenanters, the members of the Short Parliament

  2. How far can the problems facing the colony of Virginia from 1607 to 1624 ...

    These years can be characterised by better stability and prosperity for the Colony through the growth of the tobacco trade which has been dubbed 'Virginia's Gold'. Under Gates and Dale new settlements were established, an example of this is Henrico.

  1. Alexandre de Rhodes and the Vietnamese culture

    The Japanese and the Jesuits, Alessandro Valignano in sixteenth-century Japan, London and New York, Routledge, p. 145 [12] Of the Jesuits, there was oddly enough, a Japanese missionary, who was a master of Chinese calligraphy. [13] Claude, L., Pham, D.

  2. Economics in 17th Century New England

    In the first year, a fire in the common storehouse destroyed a large portion of food and supplies. Soon after, thirty-six more people immigrated to Plymouth Colony. Because of this, rations became smaller for each family as everyone had to share from the common storehouse.[7] This quote shows that collectivism failed.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work