• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

In Poland in 1939 and in Western Europe in 1940 the German Army defeated its enemies quickly. Was this only because of the Blitzkrieg tactics used?

Extracts from this document...


In Poland in 1939 and in Western Europe in 1940 the German Army defeated its enemies quickly. Was this only because of the Blitzkrieg tactics used? Blitzkrieg was the term used to describe the method of fighting Germany used to defeat its enemies in World War Two. Its main aim was to defeat countries quickly avoiding a two front war and preventing a war of attrition which had eventually resulted in the German defeat in the First World War. In Poland the defeat was mainly because of the Blitzkrieg tactics used whereas in Norway and France other factors were more important. There were many parts to Blitzkrieg that were all key in a successful invasion these included the rapid advances in technology of the previous twenty years with the development of tanks called Panzers and modern aircraft called Stukas, the elements of speed and surprise, the strong leadership from the front and the use of a pincer movement. Although the elements of Blitzkrieg described above played a vital role in the invasions of Poland, France and Norway there were other factors such as the weakness and lack of cooperation of the allies, comparative army size and tactical mistakes that also contributed to the success of the Blitzkrieg campaigns. The concept of Blitzkrieg was actually quite simple but understood by few at the time. ...read more.


When the attack on Norway and Denmark began the allies found that their maps and information where insufficient in detail which made planning defensive strategies difficult. The Norwegian army was tiny compared to the German forces and still recovering from the Russo - Finish war however British and French armies where strong and certainly matched the strength of the technologically advanced German Army. The hierarchical system employed by the Germans reinforced strong leadership but unlike the British Army made sure all ranks were well informed of the importance of the effective implementation of tactics and the goals set. Battles were not won by the weight of numbers but by the superior skill, planning and organisation of the German Army. Tanks played an important part in modern warfare however Germany had 2, 700 tanks to the combined total of 3,200 British and French tanks. Nevertheless Germany still managed to secure a successful attack and in tactics and leadership skills France and Britain where far outclassed. Although many lives were lost at sea the attack on Norway was mostly successful however it was not defeated quickly by Germany. This successful attack despite the slow movement of German forces was due to a combination of reasons but mainly because of the inefficient and uncooperative French and British Forces. ...read more.


In Norway the vital element of speed was lost due to the bad weather and harsh conditions however the disorganisation of the allies meant they did not take advantage of this serious weakness in the German forces. Frances was defeated for similar reasons although there was no bad weather to slow down the rate of the Germans attack. Although Blitzkrieg was very effective in the campaigns it was used in if it had been used for a longer amount of time it is likely the allies would have realised the nature of German tactics and provided a more effective defence slowing the German attack. If the vital element of speed had been lost would blitzkrieg still have been valuable? It would still have been successful as it was not just the Blitzkrieg tactics used but also the efficient way they were applied that led to German victories. Due to the totalitarian nature of Germany at the time and the nationalistic attitude of its society made strong leadership (an important element of Blitzkrieg) work well in the German forces which meant that all elements of Blitzkrieg could be exploited to there full potential. Thus Blitzkrieg was a highly effective tactic employed by Germany in the campaigns against Poland and Western Europe. However its success was greatly increased by the weakness, lack of cooperation and stupidity of the allies which increased the effect of the efficient German forces in both carrying out and preparing to implement blitzkrieg tactics. Keira May Harvey History Coursework 11JL ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our University Degree 1920-1949 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related University Degree 1920-1949 essays

  1. The Re-Unification Of Germany.

    that without the support or at least the co-operation of the Soviet Union the route the two Germanies followed in their quest for unity would have been far more laborious. Great Britain Surprisingly the British response to the prospect of a united Germany was far closer to that of the Soviet Union, rather than its traditional ally, the United States.

  2. What were the Main Features of the Stalinist System

    Yezhov was later arrested and shot in the purge of the secret police. Yezhov was scapegoat by Stalin for the excesses of the purges which he named Yezhovschina. However in reality Yezhov was just the implementer of Stalin's directives. The last death sentence of the purges to be carried out

  1. This report will analyse both the negative and positive impacts of the First World ...

    Relatively, the status of the upper class was reduced through beak out of the war (Black, 2000). As a result, there was effectively three-party system in 1920s, and finally the Liberals were replaced by the Labour party (Marwick, 2000). Therefore, as one of major impacts of the First World War,

  2. Account for the rise and fall of the Popular Front in France

    being seen as a home grown attempt at a fascist style Coup d'�tat as Levy suggests,13 was enough to create an initial intense fear of fascism resulting in the coming together of the left and the eventual formation of the Popular Front.

  1. In considering the process of change in the German Government 1890-1991, how far can ...

    Wilhelm, emboldened by pride sought to compete with Britain's navy, wrote the Kruger Telegram and supported French dissidents. His incompetence is shown in his actions; simply doing as others suggested, as seen in Muller's letter that "The German people believe in their ability and duty to expand5".

  2. Within the context 1814 1939, to what extent could the Wall Street Crash ...

    On May 8th 1919 President Ebert himself proclaimed the treaty terms as ?unrealizable and unbearable?[10] It was not an unusual occurrence for the cost of war to be charged to the defeated country, in order to repair the damage that had been done to the victors.

  1. Were the Gypsies of Europe subject to a genocide in the years 1939-1945?

    The gypsy race was not annihilated in the same ruthless way as the Jewish race during the war years. In the same way that we can use the UN convention definition of to prove that the gypsies were not subject to genocide, we can also look at its faults and imprecision to prove that they were.

  2. Amongst the various acts of barbarism and repression in Europe during the 1930s and ...

    13 Bell further explains the difference between German Nazism and Fascism. He explains that Nazism was deeply rooted in the racial theories and Social Darwinism of the nineteenth century, whilst Fascism was unconcerned about race. 14Racism became a state policy with the introduction of the Nuremberg Laws which gave greater

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work