“The military successes of Germany in 1939 and 1940 are explained more by the inadequacies and mistakes of its enemies than by German military superiority”.

How far do you agree with this judgement?

Germany, after the First World War, had been heavily disarmed and despite Hitler’s meticulous attempts to re-arm the German military, he should not logically have been able to match any of the Allied forces.  Having said that, Germany did have a formidable force against the allies that could drag the war for as long as it did, it is therefore an a biased statement to say that Germany’s military success was as a result of the inadequacies of their enemies rather than German military superiority in the various situations.  It would be argued that it was in fact both German superiority and the negligence and inadequacy of their enemies that was the key to their successes in 1939 and 1940.

In 1939, Germany was setting the foundation for their European war while most of their enemies were seeking for political and diplomatic negotiations to prevent a war.  This singular position, technically, already puts the German forces in a better stead to be victorious in a combative encounter.  Hitler’s easy deal with Neville Chamberlain is a reflection of the stance of Germany at that point in time.  The failure of the  showed that deals made with Hitler at the negotiating table could not be trusted.  The move into Poland was the first point of negligence of the Allied forces, as it was also the first victory for the German military.  The dilemma that the Allies faced was what can be seen as the cause of the act of negligence.  They were not fully prepared and were not fully committed to rescuing Poland.  The Soviet Union on the other hand were quick to share the spoils with Germany, which can be seen as a completely independent and selfish act.  

Join now!

On , Germany invaded Poland, using the false pretext of a faked "" on a German border post.

On September 3, the United Kingdom and France declared war on Germany, followed quickly by Canada, Australia and New Zealand.

The French mobilized slowly, and then mounted only a token offensive in the , which they soon abandoned, while the British could not take any direct action in support of the Poles in the time available (see ). Meanwhile, on , the Germans reached , having slashed through the Polish defenses.

On , the , pursuant to its agreement with Germany, invaded ...

This is a preview of the whole essay