• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month


Extracts from this document...


Plato's Philosophy Name: Jousianne Propp Subject: Theology and Ethics 1.a) The Allegory of the Cave The Allegory of the Cave can be found in Book VII of Plato's best-known work, The Republic, a lengthy discussion on the nature of justice. It is written as a dialogue between Socrates and his apprentice Glaucon. Plato creates the image of prisoners who have been chained inside a cave since birth. Their limbs and heads are immobilized so that their eyes are fixed to a wall opposite them. Behind the prisoners is a fire and in front of that there is a raised path, along which shapes of various artificial objects are being carried. These cast shadows on the wall. The prisoners assign names to the images they see and which they believe to be real, for this is the only reality they know. One of the prisoners escapes and sees the fire and the people carrying the objects. He continues towards the mouth of the cave and steps outside. The sunlight blinds him and at first he can only make out dark blurry shapes which soon become bright and clear and he observes that everything he has seen in the cave are just images of the reality he sees now. ...read more.


In contrast, the contemporary approach known as British Empiricism held that all ideas come to us through experience, and thus that knowledge (with the possible exception of mathematics) is essentially empirical. At issue is the fundamental source of human knowledge, and the proper techniques for verifying what we think we know. Rationalists typically argued that, starting with intuitively-understood basic principles, like the axioms of geometry, one could deductively derive the rest of knowledge. The philosophers who held this view most clearly were Baruch Spinoza and Gottfried Leibniz, whose attempts to grapple with the epistemological and metaphysical problems raised by Descartes led to a development of the fundamental approach of Rationalism. Both Spinoza and Leibniz thought that, in principle, all knowledge - including scientific knowledge - could be gained through the use of reason alone, though they both accepted that in practice this wasn't possible for human beings except in specific areas such as maths. Descartes, on the other hand, was closer to Plato, thinking that only knowledge of eternal truths - including the truths of mathematics, and the epistemological and metaphysical foundations of the sciences - could be attained by reason alone; other knowledge required experience of the world, aided by the scientific method. ...read more.


While one horse is of noble breed and well-behaved, the other, is unruly and rebellious. He uses this metaphor to describe the soul's partition in three main parts: The divine part - reason The noble part - courage The reluctant part - desire Plato assigns different virtues to these three components; the soul's first task is to become wise through reason; therefore reason's virtue is wisdom. The soul's second task is to obey reason and it's virtue is bravery and the third task is to control desire, so it's virtue is moderation. Plato places a forth virtue above these three: justice (diakaios´┐Żne). Justice can only be done when the three virtues fulfill their individual tasks as one. In the analogy the charioteer represents reason, which should be in control. The fine horse denotes the noble emotions of the spirited part of the soul (courage) and the disorderly horse represents the passions of the desiring part of the soul. The implications of the analogy are clear: if the charioteer has no horses at all the chariot is never going to move; if you have a two-horse carriage and only one horse is yoked to it, the chariot will go askew immediately, so in order for your wagon to move straight you must have both horses properly harnessed. ?? ?? ?? ?? 1 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our University Degree Philosophy and Theology section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related University Degree Philosophy and Theology essays

  1. In this paper, I am going to compare and contrast Hume's empiricism to Descartes' ...

    Our ideas depend on experiences, whether inwardly or outwardly. Every idea that we know such as color, sound come through experience. Other ideas such as gold mountain, mermaid are derived from single impression but are 'compounded' of simple ideas each of which is copied from impression. It is through the mind that we are able to recall impressions we have had in the past.

  2. Kant's Philosophy

    Locke, for instance, was a representative realist about the external world and placed great confidence in the ability of the senses to inform us of the properties that empirical objects really have in themselves7. Locke had also argued that the mind is a blank slate, or a tabula rasa, that becomes populated with ideas by its interactions with the world8.

  1. "The mind body distinction is a myth derived from philosophers such as Plato

    Even if someone and their soul dies that does not mean that life has experienced death. Plato's most famous, philosophical disciple, Aristotle, adopted much of the thinking of his mentor, however, in some areas such as the body soul distinction his views differed "Plato is dear to me but the truth is dearer still."

  2. Rationalism and Empiricism.

    creative powers extent no further than, "the materials afforded to us by the senses and experience". Hume did argue that knowledge was never absolutely certain, but knowledge could be attained by the careful and systematic perceptions of facts. Both Rationalism and Empiricism contain strengths and weaknesses.

  1. 'The body/soul distinction is a myth derived from philosophers such as Plato.' Discuss.

    It would seem that there are an infinite number of souls present within the world if the population is increasing. This does not seem likely. However, even if the human population is increasing, the same cannot be said for all of the creatures on the planet.

  2. There are no a priori truths. Discuss.

    He claims that, after General Relativity, Euclidean geometry ceased to be the correct geometry to describe space, replaced by non-Euclidean geometry (specifically, Riemannian geometry). In this geometry, space may be curved and so our conception of a straight line has been revised.

  1. Platonic love. The Symposium and the Phaedrus. Each of these works is a ...

    In the first speech, there is a love characterized by madness, the overwhelming embodiment of passions. We have the exaggeration of madness insofar as it rejects all rationality. In the second speech, we find that Socrates recants earlier statements as he elaborates that this can only be the true form of love, when the lover is a philosopher.

  2. In both Immanuel Kants Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals and John Stuart Mills ...

    The first of the major flaws is in how happiness is actually measured. Mill?s own teacher, Jeremy Bentham, believed in an idea of a quantitative way to determine happiness via the use of scientific measuring devices, which was referred to as the ?calculus of felicity? (Mike Fisk, University of Michigan Student).

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work