• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

"The mind body distinction is a myth derived from philosophers such as Plato

Extracts from this document...


"The mind body distinction is a myth derived from philosophers such as Plato." Discuss. In understanding the distinction that many philosophers make between body and soul (mind), it is important to define these key terms. The 'body' is considered to be the physical form of human or animal, 'the complete material structure or physical form.' It is the outer characteristic that generally people recognise us by; it is 'matter' and is both spatial and temporal. There are different interpretations of soul, which can be defined as the 'non physical aspect of person' (their internal characteristics), the spiritual part of a human being that is believed by some to survive death, and that which animates the body. Many philosophers approach the problem of the mind body distinction from a dualist viewpoint, in this context the theory that human beings are made up of two independent constituents, the body and the mind or soul. The philosopher Plato, a dualist, held his concept of the Forms as central to his epistemology. Plato argued that, the empirical world is unreal, and can not be the object of true knowledge as it is constantly changing, but that the only thing that is real is the, separate, eternal, everlasting realm of the forms. ...read more.


Perhaps the key idea of Aristotle's view of the body/soul distinction is that of soul being an organising principal which animates the body (including animals). Aristotle concluded that to be alive the body needs the soul; and the soul needs the body. The two are inseparable. The views of St Augustine see the fusion of Platonism and Christianity 'If the Platonists could have had this life over with us...they would have become Christians, with the change of words and statements." However, Augustine, predominantly a dualist, was sceptical about some aspects of Platonism, namely Plato's belief in learning as a type of remembrance and thus he rejected any idea of the pre-existence of the soul. Augustine, in his earlier writings, reiterated Plato's general idea of the body, considering it to be a "cage" for the soul. Augustine's embarrassment with the body could perhaps be due to his membership of a fringe Christian sect (The Manichees) who regarded the lower half of the body as the work of the devil as a young man, this aversion to the body is commonplace in some of the early Church despite it not following with its Jewish roots. Augustine was also influenced by the neo-Platonist Plotinus, who believed that the soul is superior to the body as it could exist independently to the body. ...read more.


Rather than being enfleshed souls, Dawkins believes that there is simply no such thing as a soul 'there is no spirit driven life force....life is just bytes and bytes of digital information' Dawkins River out of Eden. Dawkins view, rather depressingly, is that living creatures are nothing more than 'survival machines' with a program to replicate. It could be argued here that this replaces the spiritual concept of the soul with a more modern myth as. It could be said that the evolutionary drive to 'propagate the digital database that did the programming' could be called the life force that drives the universe; Aquinas might simply add the phrase 'this is what everyone understands to be God'. The body-soul distinction was first "formulated as philosophical doctrine in ancient Greece" it was "baptised into Christianity, ran through the medieval period, and entered the modern world with the public status of a self-evident truth" when it was refined by Descartes in the 17th century. "Since World War 2, however the Cartesian mind-matter dualism, having been taken for granted for many centuries, has been strongly criticised" (John Hick). However whilst, the mind body distinction, first doctrined by Plato and revised by Descartes has been widely criticised in modern times, it can be claimed that it is no more a myth than the theories of the likes of Hick and Dawkins, that have attempted to displace it. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our University Degree Philosophy and Theology section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related University Degree Philosophy and Theology essays

  1. What is the relationship between mind and body?

    If this were so, would this mean that if only part of the brain was taken and used in conjunction with another person's body that the person would, in part, also be within the other. At this point, it seems as though some one person could be two different people,

  2. Is it an advantage of Descartes substance dualism that it allows the possibility of ...

    There is little evidence to prove life after death and so why would someone think that the soul can survive the death of the body? It may be understandable to believe that it did if, say every so often, our souls decided to leave our bodies and go off on their own to experience the world.

  1. 'The body/soul distinction is a myth derived from philosophers such as Plato.' Discuss.

    Aristotle believed that 'soul' was essentially the 'form' of the body. It moulds the body and gives it form or shape. Although he did acknowledge that there were fundamentally two entities present - they were not separate. He claimed that body and soul could not exist independently of each other; when the body dies, the soul also ceases to exist.

  2. How convincing are Platos arguments for the immortality of the soul in the Phaedo?

    After being convinced that Socrates will not be upset or unsettled if Simmias voices his opinions on the premise of his argument, Simmias then objects that "the soul might be like a harmony from a lyre, 'invisible and bodiless and all-beautiful and divine, yet nevertheless bound to perish when someone

  1. The Continuity of the Self. Many philosophers are unsatisfied with memory as the ...

    Lucy's sense of self is a special case. Locke would argue that while Lucy's body was there, her person was not physically there. While the first part of Locke's explanation is certainly true, the second is slightly incorrect. Memory, as it pertains to Lucy and the rest of humankind, is based in the subconscious.

  2. The Myth of Mental Illness

    A situation or condition that results from the coexistence of disparate or antagonistic qualities, identities, or activities: the national schizophrenia that results from carrying out an unpopular war.? ?Any of a group of psychotic disorders usually characterized by withdrawal from reality, illogical patterns of thinking, delusions, and hallucinations, and

  1. Are atrocities an integral part of war?

    perhaps arguing for a pacifist stance[13] which as a generalisation argues that there is no justification for war.[14] However even if ideally they would be no war in the world, the fact is that war is still a regular occurrence in the world today and it is better to have

  2. Justice in the Republic. The Republic of Plato examines how Plato believes that ...

    Moreover, Socrates suggests three ways of bringing up a just and perfect city; these are called the "Three waves". Socrates explains that the first is equality of the sexes meaning males and females should be treated the same; Plato believed that males and females should be given the same education and both should have the same opportunities within the society.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work