The Soviet response to the Hungarian revolution of 1956.

Authors Avatar

                

The Soviet Response to the Hungarian Revolution of 1956

By Yancey Flores

When Stalin died in March of 1953, a great uncertainty arose concerning who his successor would be and the stability of the satellite states in Eastern Europe. His policy of ruling with an iron fist had aggravated millions of Soviet subjects and his death provided the opportunity to voice these feelings. Protests broke out in Eastern Europe, some escalating into revolts that were swiftly crushed by the Red Army. Hoping to avoid further conflicts, the governing body in Moscow, the Kremlin, decided to relax their policies concerning the governments of its satellite states. In certain areas such as Hungary, they replaced the heads of the Communist Party with more liberal leaders to sate the people’s desires for change. Although it appeared to work, the Kremlin reversed its policy two years later, angering most Hungarians, who were tired of their endless poverty and corrupt leadership. When a rebellion that broke out in Poland was settled diplomatically, the Hungarians were convinced that they also could attain reforms because of destalinization. The Hungarians, discontented with the confusion and ineptitude of their state, attempted to separate themselves from the Soviet Union, but their rash acts brought about a brutal & tragic repression by the Red Army.

As part of the “thaw” that occurred in Soviet policies post-Stalin’s death, the Kremlin summoned Matyas Rakosi, the Hungarian Communist Party leader, to Moscow, where they criticized his use terror policies to maintain stability and the great lack of progress in Hungary’s economy. Most importantly, Rakosi was ordered to cede the position of prime minister to Imre Nagy, a liberal communist who enjoyed great popular support. On July 4, 1953, Nagy gave his 1st speech to the National Assemble in which he daringly attacked Rakosi’s flawed Five Year Plan which had hurt the economy, condemned his used of coercion and political “purges”, and denounced many of his other policies. Over the course of the next two years, Nagy ceased the collectivization of agriculture, allowed peasants to leave the collective farms, canceled the collective farms' compulsory production quotas, and raised government prices for deliveries. These, along with other policies, helped to improve the economy and slightly raise the standard of living for millions of Hungarians. By the end of 1954, however, those in the Kremlin who supported Nagy had been ousted and Rakosi ceased the opportunity to accuse Nagy of following right wing policies and criticize his shortcomings. In April of 1955, with the help of the Kremlin, Rakosi re-assumed the premiership and expelled Nagy from the Communist Party, a move that angered millions of Hungarians and split the Hungarian Communist Party, with the opposition using the Writer’s Association as a forum for their opinions.

Join now!

The Belgrade Declaration, in which the Soviet Union and Yugoslavia recognized each other’s right to follow their own socialist systems and Nikita Khrushchev’s “Secret Speech” to the 20th Communist Party Congress, in which he condemned Stalin and endorsed a policy of destalinization, which would allow flexibility within the communist system, damaged Rakosi’s attempt to gain stability because he was anti-Tito and had carried out political purges. The Hungarian people were more confounded everyday and were growing desperate for change. The breaking point came when the Hungarian Workers’ Party forced Rakosi to take credit for his abuses of power and he attempted ...

This is a preview of the whole essay