• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

To what extent did Great Britains administration of Sudan influence the start of the First Sudanese Civil War, 1955-1972?

Extracts from this document...


To what extent did Great Britain's administration of Sudan influence the start of the First Sudanese Civil War, 1955-1972? Word Count; 1,998 Section A. Plan of Investigation To what extent did Great Britain's administration of Sudan influence the start of the First Sudanese Civil War, 1955-1972? The civil wars of the Sudan are most famously attributed to religious differences between Muslims and Christians, and the uneven distribution of natural resources between the North and South; however as demonstrated in other African countries (namely Rwanda, Angola, and Cameroon), European imperialism is a common cause of instability on the continent. Noting the above, the investigation will strive to see if this byproduct of imperialism holds true in Britain's colonial administration of the Sudan and the subsequent first civil war. It will investigate the origin of British involvement in Sudan, its administration decisions and documents pertaining to the country and reactions of the Sudanese people; particularly regarding the Southern region. The study will then further analyze the publication Sudan: A Country Study and a copy of the proceedings of the Juba Conference, June 1947 for their origin, purpose, value, and limitation in order to add clarity and validity to the argument. ...read more.


and "[the Northerners] do not seek opportunities of exploiting backward tribes in the South" ("Proc. of the Juba" 1). Section C. Evaluation of Sources The most important source for this investigation was the work Sudan: A Country Study written by Helen Chaplin Metz for the Library of Congress's Country Study series. The series is prepared by the Federal Research Division and sponsored by the Department of the Army. Its purpose is to provide a detail account of all aspects of the given country, including geography, demographics, and history, while giving specific attention to the views and beliefs of the country's people. Its value lies in that it is written by a non-Sudanese author and not published under the auspices of either Sudan or South Sudan, both fractions which would prevent a skewed account. Limitation-wise, bias and dramatization are possible as it states in the forward, "the authors strive for a dynamic rather than static portrayal" (Metz 6) and, because the work was published in 1991, the study would have occurred amidst the controversial Second Sudanese Civil War. There is also the possibility that because it was for a United States of America organization, it would be slanted towards the Christian South. ...read more.


The few Southern representatives knew English as lawfully required. By suddenly instituting Arabic as the language of government and not giving time for Arabic to be taught, these people were unable to participation and the south was left virtually unrepresented. Conversely to the above arguments, divisions between the North and South do predate the British. As the statement by Thomas Owen shows, even in 1947 the south still remembered the practice of slave raiding conducted by the North and its "oppression." It is also arguable that the British did not instigate the new southern policy rather international and northern Sudanese pressure, and noting the time period, the effects of World War II; however while these might have influenced British decision, the final actions and implementations were of Anglo-origin. Section E. Conclusion Civil wars are caused by two internal fractions fighting over ethnic, political, religious, and even ideological issues. The British, regarding the first Sudanese civil war, are responsible for augmenting these two fractions and, moreover, for placing them in a position where they would conflict by later supporting the North and South unification. This is demonstrable by looking at the British's bias towards the south, their original separation of the South, and the sudden 1940's policy change. In conclusion then, while the British did not directly spark the fighting, they exacerbated is not created the root causes. Section F. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our University Degree 1950-1999 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related University Degree 1950-1999 essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    A look at the Origin, Stigma/Discrimination and Government Involvement with AIDS in the United ...

    4 star(s)

    They saw any individuals belonging to one of the four H's must have had the AIDS virus and vice versa; they were seen as the viruses themselves infecting the United States. Individuals who had the AIDS virus in Africa also faced discrimination because of their health condition.

  2. Assess the contribution of local grass root activists in the civil rights movement

    Within the next twelve months 350 school boards representing nine southern states had desegregated...by 1956-57 school year 723 southern school districts had been desegregated, and 300,000 black children were attending formerly white schools." 7 as it meant that across America people and politicians would see the changes which would evidently

  1. The Causes of the Korean War in 1950

    This is because the underlying motives behind the North invading the South in 1950 that began the war were purely local. To begin with, the Korean peninsula had been divided into two countries that practiced the conflicting ideologies of Communism and Capitalism.

  2. A study into how much John F. Kennedy was responsible for the ...

    on January 2nd 1961 when Fidel Castro accused ?American Embassy staff members of being spies, and ordered eighty percent of them to leave the country within twenty four hours.?[7] Though only days away from handing over the Presidency to Kennedy, he felt the USA could not afford to be seen

  1. When and Why did British Decolonisation begin?

    global perspective and its bias against colonialism.[18] Therefore, one can see how economic dependency on the US and its strong stance against imperialism did push the case for decolonisation. This influence of the superpower was, in turn, bolstered with the changing of global opinion, so much so, that decolonisation was

  2. Analysis of Jean Hatzfeld's novel, The Antelope's Strategy: Living in Rwanda After the Genocide,

    The criminals would be more useful if they were sent home to resume the farming of their fields and providing crops. In 2003, Rwandan president Paul Kagame authorized the release of the lower-echelon killers involved in the genocide and their accomplices whose confessions had been accepted and had served at least half of their prison sentence (Hatzfeld, p.

  1. Examine the emergence of 'urban African Culture'

    component of the female migrant population and acquired this lurid reputation more so than any other migrant group, with their own men folk agreeing with the police and native commissioners about Basotho women?s immoral behaviour.[25] It is suggested by Deborah James that the readiness to portray women in this light

  2. World War 2 - two book reviews

    Peattie went on to say, "Embodied the central assumption with which the Imperial Japanese Navy went to war: that speed, maneuverability, and firepower would deliver a slashing stroke at the outset and would bring the giant to his knees before he could assert his massive strength" (Peattie, p. 93).

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work