• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

To what extent did the Tsarist and Soviet governments control and influence music in the period 1875-1975?

Extracts from this document...


Name: Max Norman Candidate Number: 0785 Title: To what extent did Russian governments control and influence music in the period 1875-1975? In particular, how successful were Soviet governments' attempts to control and influence Dmitri Shostakovich? The purpose of this enquiry is to assess the extent to which Russian governments controlled and influenced music in the period 1875-1975. To do this I have primarily taken three composers, each of whom I feel represents a different aspect of the musical community's relationship with governments of this period. However, Dmitri Shostakovich occupies the bulk of discussion. Much of this section is taken up by an examination of his private political views, which superficially seem only slightly relevant to the question at hand. This perception would be mistaken: establishing whether the most prominent composer of the period was or was not a "secret dissident" is crucial for determining how successful the r�gime's attempts were at controlling music. The picture presented by biographers such as Ian MacDonald of a musician who incessantly hid coded critiques of the system in his works would, if true, imply that the authorities' attempts to restrict cultural freedom were a resounding failure, but that they were unable to realise this. This scenario would have major implications for the question with which this enquiry attempts to deal, which is why much space has been devoted to it. * * * The period between Alexander II's assassination in 1881 and the revolutions of 1917 is often described as the Silver Age in Russian culture. It was during this period that a new capitalist class sought to emulate the aristocracy and support the arts. The music of Sergei Rachmaninoff is a remarkable if not innovative representation of late Russian romanticism. His work, especially the third piano concerto (1909),1 the second symphony (1908) and the Vsenoshchnoye bdeniye (1915), is renowned for its melody and closely-argued structure. In many ways Rachmaninoff was the closest heir of Chaikovsky.2 But he was not adopted by the tsarist state as the musical ambassador of Russia, as his predecessor had been. ...read more.


13 "Babi Yar" in B-flat minor (1962). By Yevgeny Yevtushenko. See above for discussion. The altered passages are four lines near the beginning and another four towards the end: Original: I imagine now that I am a Jew. Here I wander through ancient Egypt. And here, I am crucified on the cross and die, And still bear the marks of the nails... And I become like a long, soundless scream Above the thousand thousands here interred. I am each old man shot dead here, I am each child shot dead here. Replacement: I stand there as if at a wellspring, That gives me faith in our brotherhood. Here lie Russians and Ukrainians With Jews they lie in the same earth. I think about Russia's heroic feats, In blocking fascism's path. To the very tiniest dewdrop, Her whole essence and fate is dear to me.46 appendix two: letter from Dmitri Shostakovich to Isaak Glikman, December 29th 1957: Dear Isaak Davidovich, I arrived in Odessa on the day of the All-Peoples celebration of the 40th anniversary of Soviet Ukraine. This morning, I went out into the street. You, of course, understand that one cannot stay indoors on such a day. Despite wet and foggy weather, the whole of Odessa was out of doors. Everywhere are portraits of Marx, Engels, Lenin, Stalin, and also of comrades A. I. Belyaev, L. I. Brezhnev, N. A. Bulganin, K. E. Voroshilov, N. G. Ignatov, A. I. Kirilenko, F. R. Kozlov, O. V. Kuussinen, A. I. Mikoyan, N. A. Mukhitdinov, M. A. Suslov, E. A. Furtseva, N. S. Khrushchev, N. M. Shvernik, A. A. Aristov, P. A. Pospelov, Ya. E. Kalnberzin, A. P. Kirichenko, A. N. Kosygin, K. T. Mazyrov, V. P. Mzhevanadze, M. G. Pervukhin, N. T. Kalchenko. Everywhere are banners, slogans, posters. All around are happy, beaming Russian, Ukrainian, Jewish faces. Here and there one hears eulogies in honour of the great banner of Marx, Engels, Lenin, Stalin, and also in honour of comrades A. I. Belyaev, L. I. ...read more.


the inner urge of the composer, and that sooner or later he would have pursued the same path without external pressures being brought to bear on him." Schneider was a German-born musician who from 1933 lived and worked in Switzerland; this source has therefore been one of the very few available to me written in the west before the publication of Testimony. It is therefore representative of then-standard opinion that Shostakovich was a dedicated communist believer, the view repeated by Soviet authorities immediately after his death, and the view which Fay, Taruksin and others are often accused of holding. I have been able to access few other sources of this nature and such a view is as oversimplistic as the "revisionist" understanding. It was nevertheless useful as a contrast with modern historiography. 24 Fay (2000), p.103. 25 MacDonald, p.143. 26 ibid, pp.152-3. 27 ibid, p.153. 28 ibid, p.153: "Given the time and place in which it was written, the target can only be Stalin - an amazingly bold stroke." 29 Taruksin, Richard (2000), Casting a Great Composer as a Fictional Hero, New York Times 5th March 2000, accessible at http://www.nytimes.com/2000/03/05/arts/spring-music-shostakovich-casting-a-great-composer-as-a-fictional-hero.html?scp=1&sq=&st=nyt&pagewanted=3, p.2, retrieved by this author 15th February 2012. 30 Maes, p.348. 31 MacDonald, p.255. 32 Maes, 367. 33 Taruksin, p.3; this passage is also reproduced in MacDonald, p.320. 34 Fay (2000), pp.235-6. 35 Maes, p.368. 36 Fay (2000), pp.169-70. Maes 361-2. 37 Interviewed by Nolda Broekstra-Kondrashin (1979); reproduced in Wilson, p.357. 38 Fay (2000), pp.228-9. Enthusiasm: "According to Glikman, who claims to have given the composer the poem a day or so after its publication, Shostakovich's decision to set the text had been taken immediately." (p.228) 39 ibid, pp.228-37. 40 Maes, p.368. 41 Letter from Dmitri Shostakovich to Boleslav Yavorsky, 24th December, 1926, "Khorosho b�lo b� ne dumat". Quoted in Fay (2000), p.36. 42 Wilson, pp.428-9. 43 Taruksin, p.6. 44 Fay (2000), p.278. 45 Glikman, Isaak, Letters to a Friend pp.8-10, reproduced in Wilson, p.111. 46 Fay (2000), p.236. ?? ?? ?? ?? 1 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our University Degree 1920-1949 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related University Degree 1920-1949 essays

  1. Critical Analysis: Walking Since Daybreak. As a text rich with examples of postmodern ...

    only really done if he points to future developments that might follow from current events." 4 This theoretical subtext makes up only a small portion of the book, but is crucial in that it helps frame the rest of the book around it.

  2. Why US hegemony in the 20th century was inevitable.

    increase in their influence namely Japan and Germany in their economic power, and Britain and France in their political power, as well as China and India in their regional power. Communism was an institution that was doomed to failure as Graeme Gill states: Thus while the Soviet state may have

  1. Do Historical Films help or hinder our understanding of the past? Discuss with reference ...

    Overall, if historical films are to be used effectively to benefit our understanding of past events, they need to be used simultaneously with varying primary and secondary sources to ensure genuine historical accuracy. 33 Bibliography Bratu Hansen, Miriam, "Schindler's List is not Shoah: The Second Commandment, Popular Modernism and Public Memory", Critical Inquiry, Vol.

  2. Book Review - The New Deal by Paul K. Conkin

    Hoover's own approach and political stance; that the measures required to avoid a depression were politically untenable during the 1920's was as much a reflection of the mindset of the administration, as that of the average American. After all Roosevelt demonstrated five years later that, when the public political mindset

  1. Account for the varying fates of the Jewish populations in different Balkan countries during ...

    It has already been acknowledged that anti-Semitism existed in the Balkans long before the Nazis but it can be argued that the presence or absence of local anti-Semitic traditions made little difference to the percentage of Jews that survived the war.

  2. Why did the Labour Party win the General Election of 1945?

    Their achievements were well documented by the British press. The Times covered the twenty-fifth anniversary of the founding of the Red Army at the Albert Hall. The coverage is firmly appreciative of the Red Army's triumph in the Battle of Stalingrad; To-morrow's anniversary is a reminder that victories so epoch-making as this do not come by chance and cannot

  1. The Soviet Union claimed to have made women equal to men. To what extent ...

    days later due to opposition, and was in turn succeeded by Nikita Khrushchev. This period is known as the post-Stalin thaw, though Khrushchev had many innovative plans for women within society, and under his rule the Zhensovety, the women's councils, were founded in 1958 (Bridger, 1987: 90).

  2. Analyze the factors that gradually influenced the emergence of the Two Nation theory in ...

    Thus ethnic differences were consolidated in the form of ethno-centric politics under Ayub Khan?s regime who wanted to create an authoritarian regime and created severe conflicts by declaring Urdu as the official language of both East and West Pakistan. These differences were later acted upon and promoted when General Zia

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work