• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Were the Roosevelt Years Inherently Conservative?

Extracts from this document...


Were the Roosevelt years inherently conservative? Franklin Roosevelt was not a conservative, or at least, not a self described one. His Presidency was characterised by a series of fairly radical reforms in terms of the role of the presidency, the relationship between the American people and the federal government, increasing levels of American internationalism and the pursuit of interventionist economic policies. Many of Roosevelt's critics were themselves self identified conservatives, who, sceptical about the radical and reforming nature of Roosevelt's leadership, provided staunch opposition to many of the measures of the New Deal. However; Roosevelt and his government was also subjected to a good deal of criticism from the political left, indicating that a government's ideology cannot be defined by the identity and ideology of those who oppose it. Roosevelt's government can be called conservative in neither policy nor ideology, but neither can it be called a true liberal government. In order to analyse the conservatism of Roosevelt it must be made clear from the outset that the simple dichotomy between conservative and liberal politics is insufficient. The Roosevelt era can be viewed then as an era led by a politician who was seemingly not driven by ideological dogma, but, though some historians would dispute this1, by reaction to economic and political circumstance, it can also be seen, in the early period of Roosevelt's presidential career, be seen as a conscious reaction away from the overtly conservative policies of his predecessor Herbert Hoover. ...read more.


It was popular too. 'In the election of 1936 Franklin Roosevelt achieved on of the centuries most smashing triumphs. Running against moderate Republican Alfred M. Landon of Kansas, he carried forty six of the forty eight states with just over 60% of the popular vote6.' Of course the initial relief and recovery stages of the New Deal were, by the late mid 1930's being supplanted by an increasingly reform focussed administration, and it was in this reform that Roosevelt began to run into opposition to and criticism of his policies. In earlier years of the New Deal, Roosevelt, though criticised by staunch conservatives, had been able to pass New Deal legislation with relative ease. By 1937, however, things had become more difficult and even members of his own party with conservative leanings were beginning to mount against him. For example Senator William Bailey, a Democratic senator for North Carolina and initial, albeit sceptical ally of Roosevelt during the early years of the New Deal, broke away from his party in order to form a bipartisan coalition of conservatives, together with the Republican Arthur Vandenberg, from which any further New Deal institutions could be opposed. For conservatives, the New Deal was a step too far in state regulation, and many felt that excessive New Deal legislation was akin to socialistic politics, something unthinkable even in Roosevelt's America. Roosevelt himself courted controversy through various incidents, most notably the 'court packing' incident of 1937 in which he was accused of attempting to manipulate the membership of the Supreme Court in order to enforce the retirement of conservative judges sceptical to his New Deal measures and replacing them with more willing figures. ...read more.


The new jobs created were invariably taken up by whites, and in many New Deal institutions such as the Tennessee Valley Authority, segregation was in force11. Despite this, the black electorate flocked to the New Deal and whether 'seduced by Roosevelt's rhetoric12', or simply responding out of desperation to the idea of hope, something which was certainly not offered by Roosevelt's conservative rivals, it is clear that the criticisms levelled at Roosevelt by his leftist critics cannot really be attributed to any 'conservatism' on the part of Roosevelt himself. The Roosevelt years then were inherently unconservative. They were a period of huge reform in both the role of the presidency and of federal government vastly expanded, and an age of economic and social intervention when previously there had been as little as possible. This was in part necessitated by circumstance; an unprecedented situation like the great depression called for an unprecedented solution. Whatever the criticisms levelled at Roosevelt, they cannot be attributed to any sense of conservatism in either his methods or aims. The problem is that the society in which he was enacting these radical schemes was, for all its pluralism, on the whole inherently conservative, particularly in areas such as the south. For a politician whose rhetoric spoke of delivering for everybody, that also included conservative thinkers and big business. The most profound effects of Roosevelt's policies on conservatism in America was then to usher in the redrawing of party political lines on a liberal/conservative basis; and to redefine the nature of the role of president to the extent that never again would a presidency along truly conservative lines be possible. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our University Degree 1920-1949 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related University Degree 1920-1949 essays

  1. Book Review - The New Deal by Paul K. Conkin

    Conkin's approach is one of a chronological analysis with the book being split into four chapters, the latter three dealing with the developmental stages of the New Deal, from just prior to the election of Roosevelt, when he gives a brief analysis of the reasons for the Great Depression, and

  2. Why did the Labour Party win the General Election of 1945?

    The Conservatives failed to convince the public on the most important issue of the election. There was a great hope for good post-war employment prospects among the electorate; How the respective parties addressed this was very important. Labour wished to direct British resources, boost demand, increase investment and nationalise the

  1. To what extent did the Tsarist and Soviet governments control and influence music in ...

    7 Figes, p.738. 8 Volkov, Solomon (1979), Testimony: The Memoirs of Dmitri Shostakovich, Faber and Faber (1987). My description of Volkov's work as a "discredited forgery" requires elaboration. The book first appeared in 1979, since then having been published in many translations (though curiously never in the original Russian), and

  2. The Great Depression: 11 Years of Life Lost to Suffering, Despair, and Poverty.

    Before the 1920's it was almost impossible to afford an automobile unless you were wealthy, however during the "Roaring 20's" almost everybody owned this vehicle and the automobile industry increased the demand for steel, rubber, and oil. 4 People were living each day without fear or worry.

  1. Analyze the factors that gradually influenced the emergence of the Two Nation theory in ...

    However, the failure of the two nation theory does not imply that the creation of Pakistan was a mistake or a premature step towards independence. The differences which existed seventy years ago which necessitated the creation of Pakistan can still be viewed today in light of the events that are

  2. Within the context 1814 1939, to what extent could the Wall Street Crash ...

    suggest those weaknesses are a direct main cause for the Second World War. Through this longitudinal evaluation it can be concluded that economic hardships play a cardinal role in any global unsettlement; ergo an event like the Wall Street Crash, which virtually sent the whole world into a state of

  1. An Analysis of Edward Saids Out of Place from a Postcolonial Perspective

    Said narrates about the issue, ?It was Aunt Nabiha that I first experienced Palestine was history and cause in the anger and consternation I felt over the suffering of the refugees, those others whom she brought into my life. It was also she who communicated to the desolations of being

  2. Were the Gypsies of Europe subject to a genocide in the years 1939-1945?

    comparing very different genocidal acts against one another, especially when they differ in size. The UN definition sates destruction in whole or ?in part?, but how to define what constitutes ?a part? is a never-ending path. The gypsies for example were indeed subject to genocide ?in part?, but the n**i?s

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work